god exists

[Deleted member 86562]

non-existance=nothing
nothing is just a linguistic construct, in reality it does not exist

nothing doesnt exist true nigga

therefore god must exist???? explain to me how that logically implies god exists

 

[Deleted member 231621]

??? nothing doesnt exist true nigga

therefore god must exist???? explain to me how that logically implies god exists

non-existence does not exists. so god just can not be non-existing, otherwise we couldn't even think about god

 

[curtisjoneslover]

title

he does, and he's good

 

[Deleted member 230985]

non-existance=nothing
nothing is just a linguistic construct, in reality it does not exist

since u think a definition can be used as proof, here is proof for the non-existence of god

existence definition is "the fact or state of living or having objective reality"

god existing is not an objective reality, therefore god doesnt exist

there is more to truth than just twisting definitions of words to fit a belief system, gods existence cannot be proved or disproved

 

[Deleted member 86562]

non-existence does not exists. so god just can not be non-existing, otherwise we couldn't even think about god

thats still just wordplay tho. youre basically defining it into existence which isnt proof of anything

 

[Deleted member 231621]

since u think a definition can be used as proof, here is proof for the non-existence of god

existence definition is "the fact or state of living or having objective reality"

god existing is not an objective reality, therefore god doesnt exist

this is just self-refuting because even if we accept your definition of existence through objective reality (lol), then your claim that God is not objective (by your subjective opinion)

there is more to truth than just twisting definitions of words to fit a belief system

i'm not twisting definitions lul it's what you are doing

 

[Deleted member 231621]

thats still just wordplay tho. youre basically defining it into existence which isnt proof of anything

why it isn't a proof?

 

[Deleted member 86562]

why it isn't a proof?

because youre presupposing him existing. its the same as me saying nothing doesnt exist but instead of god I say unicorns must therefore exist

 

[Deleted member 179826]

Would be kinda cool, ngl

how to change your org to look like that?

 

[Deleted member 231621]

because youre presupposing him existing. its the same as me saying nothing doesnt exist but instead of god I say unicorns must therefore exists

non-existence is impossible by its nature, because if it exists, then it is already something, and not nothing, so god can't be non-existing. debate this instead of debating what i've never said

 

[Deleted member 86562]

non-existence is impossible by its nature, because if it exists, then it is already something, and not nothing, so god can't be non-existing. debate this instead of debating what i've never said

yea again this doesnt prove actual existence of anything, I was pointing out what was wrong with your reasoning before.

but yea just because something is logically impossible in abstract thinking doesnt mean something (god) must therefore exist as I said youre presupposing his existence which is the issue

I believe in god but I dont think this is a good argument

 

[Deleted member 231621]

yea again this doesnt prove actual existence of anything, I was pointing out what was wrong with your reasoning before.

but yea just because something is logically impossible in abstract thinking doesnt mean something (god) must therefore exist as I said youre presupposing his existence which is the issue

I believe in god but I dont think this is a good argument

so you are making a premise that god must be something material? then does 2+2=4 exist to you? it's not something material

 

[Deleted member 86562]

so you are making a premise that god must be something material? then does 2+2=4 exist to you? it's not something material

gosh rea i was trying to be nice to you because I felt bad I called you a black tranny. im not denying that concepts exists but just because something is logically coherent doesnt mean it actually exists

now shoo away with this argument I saw you made something similar in that free will thread I just dnrd it, I saw 2+2=4 tho

 

[Deleted member 231621]

because non-existence doesn't exist, so god just can not be non-existing

@PrinceLuenLeoncur thoughts on this argument?

 

[Klasik616]

non-existence does not exists. so god just can not be non-existing, otherwise "we couldn't even think about god"

Confusing ontology with episteme again?

 

[Klasik616]

because non-existence doesn't exist, so dragons just can not be non-existing

So aliens
So gods
So Troy
So past lives
So Atlantis
And so on

 

[Don Alejo Garza]

why?

Short answer: Too much suffering exists.

 

[Deleted member 231621]

So aliens
So gods
So Troy
So past lives
So Atlantis
And so on

yeah they all do. debate me if you think they don't exist

 

[Deleted member 231621]

Confusing ontology with episteme again?

it's not a confusion because thought and being is the same thing

 

[Klasik616]

it's not a confusion because thought and being is the same thing

0/10 in philosophy exam. No philosopher has said this ever.

 

[Deleted member 231621]

0/10 in philosophy exam. No philosopher has said this ever.

but i use ontology to ground epistemology

 

[batman1997]

Really?

 

[Deleted member 231621]

Really?

yes