Good genes theory is mostly a cope

[Deleted member 15338]

Women are just bisexual childs jfl if u believe things like female nature or female choice. Muh women are attracted to dimorphism, let's take a look at dimorphic traits:

-Long midface, unattractive.
-Big, wider, more downturned and long nose, unattractive.
-Lower ES ratio, unattractive.
-Lower midface ratio, unattractive
-Lower fwhr, unattractive.
-Facial hair, unattractive.
-Body hair, unattractive.
-Downward growth, unattractive.
-High gonial angle, unattractive.
-More recessed jaws, unattractive.
-Low canthal tilts, unattractive.
-More recessed maxillas, unattractive.
-Norwooding, unattractive.
-More acnes and worse skin overall, unattractive.
-Thin hair, unattractive.
-Dark triad/bad boy personality, attractive.
-Tall and square chin, attractive.
-Good height, frame and muscles, attractive.
-Vertically narrow eyes, attractive.

And ALL the counterparts of unattractive traits i counted are attractive to women. Then i come with the conclusion ALL women are bisexual and act on how they feel it is not about muh good genes or sexual selection jfl. In actual nature ogres would get the most pussy but they are not attractive to women, after all of these we can say female selection itself is a cope and a feminist lie, it never happened, NEVER.


Thoughts ? @MarkCorrigan @TraumatisedOgre @thecel @Theodore Bagwell @looksmaxxer234 @Frank Jack @n0rthface @germanlooks

 

[hebbewem]

Most women arent bisexual .

 

[Deleted member 15338]

Most women arent bisexual .

ALL women are bisexual your mom included. And you are the one of the dumbest users here tbh.

 

[Deleted member 9670]

Most women arent bisexual .

they are either bisexual or lesbian

 

[calzium]

This whole post is just a mess of low IQ coleslaw.

Cant fix that either so its over

 

[Deleted member 13787]

All men are femboysexual

 

[Deleted member 15338]

This whole post is just a mess of low IQ coleslaw.

Cant fix that either so its over

Go ahead and cope by saying muh you perfect harmony between feminity and masculinity

 

[calzium]

Go ahead and cope by saying muh you perfect harmony between feminity and masculinity

You havent even argued anything sensible.

You listed a bunch of dimorphic traits of men which happen to be unnattractive, and then you concluded that because women arent attracted to these traits they dont select sexually?

Am i missing something or are you literally an ape IQ?

 

[Deleted member 15338]

You havent even argued anything sensible.

You listed a bunch of dimorphic traits of men which happen to be unnattractive, and then you concluded that because women arent attracted to these traits they dont select sexually?

Am i missing something or are you literally an ape IQ?

Yeah exactly you summed up post perfectly tbh

 

[calzium]

Yeah exactly you summed up post perfectly tbh

In history women were not allowed to select men in general. Men would mate with whatever female they wanted as long as they were strong,

however

women ultimately control the child they bare, as they can have sex secretly with whomever they wish. They also are able to have sexual preferences in the event that they do not control who they mate with.

Just because ogres mated with many women throughout history doesnt mean that women are magically attracted to ogres.

 

[Deleted member 15338]

In history women were not allowed to select men in general. Men would mate with whatever female they wanted as long as they were strong,

however

women ultimately control the child they bare, as they can have sex secretly with whomever they wish. They also are able to have sexual preferences in the event that they do not control who they mate with.

Just because ogres mated with many women throughout history doesnt mean that women are magically attracted to ogres.

I dont think female selection dont exist at all what i am trying to say is most partners women choose nowadays isnt about good genes or sexual selection it is about how they feel about it tbh for example Justin Bieber wouldnt make a good hunter but he slayed nearly all supermodels.

 

[calzium]

I dont think female selection dont exist at all what i am trying to say is most partners women choose nowadays isnt about good genes or sexual selection it is about how they feel about it tbh for example Justin Bieber wouldnt make a good hunter but he slayed nearly all supermodels.

Ok ok then I agree with you totally

Women are attracted to features the same way a female bird will pick males with bright colors. Its a fisherian runaway.

I misunderstood what you meant. Its total cope to believe "Chad" is somehow genetically superior.

I'll add tho that indicators of health (shoulder to waist ratio, large mandible, healthy hair, clear skin, greater size and fitness etc ) are actual preferences for a chance of survival.

Both preferences and evolutionary processes coexist i believe.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

More androgynous men are weak and incapable of providing and protecting.

Men who are overtly masculine are seen as a threat to the woman as they are too strong

F1 is "friend" F2 is enemy. And F3 is lover

Don stands for dominant ltm and STM for short term and long term men. Avm for average man and "and" for androgynous men.

 

[germanlooks]

Ok ok then I agree with you totally

Women are attracted to features the same way a female bird will pick males with bright colors. Its a fisherian runaway.

I misunderstood what you meant. Its total cope to believe "Chad" is somehow genetically superior.

I'll add tho that indicators of health (shoulder to waist ratio, large mandible, healthy hair, clear skin, greater size and fitness etc ) are actual preferences for a chance of survival.

Both preferences and evolutionary processes coexist i believe.

I dont think female selection dont exist at all what i am trying to say is most partners women choose nowadays isnt about good genes or sexual selection it is about how they feel about it tbh for example Justin Bieber wouldnt make a good hunter but he slayed nearly all supermodels.

Hmm I don’t fully agree with that tbh.
The Justin Bieber example isn’t really good because he mainly was attractive to little teenage girls and also mostly because of his Status. Without the status and musician halo he would be a normal teenager. Obv above average in looks but zero appeal to women above 18y.

Genetics still play a role in how a woman chooses her partner.
Wide shoulders will automatically trigger a attraction in her brain. And the same goes for many other attractive masculine traits. The main difference to the past is that personality matters more theses days. And no girl will reject you because of narrow shoulders if you have a good looking face either.

All the traits you listed above aren’t dimorphic but just unattractive. They might appear more often in males but that doesn’t make them dimorphic in an attractive way.
For example downward growth isn’t attractive. On the other hand a tall lower third cause by a tall ramus is attractive.

Like I don’t really understand what your both points are exactly? A woman chooses the man she feels attracted to. And this attraction is most of the time and to a big part based on his looks. Which means she is attracted to his genes. Because the more attractive you (Good Genes) the more women are attracted to you.

 

[Deleted member 15338]

Hmm I don’t fully agree with that tbh.
The Justin Bieber example isn’t really good because he mainly was attractive to little teenage girls and also mostly because of his Status. Without the status and musician halo he would be a normal teenager. Obv above average in looks but zero appeal to women above 18y.

Genetics still play a role in how a woman chooses her partner.
Wide shoulders will automatically trigger a attraction in her brain. And the same goes for many other attractive masculine traits. The main difference to the past is that personality matters more theses days. And no girl will reject you because of narrow shoulders if you have a good looking face either.

All the traits you listed above aren’t dimorphic but just unattractive. They might appear more often in males but that doesn’t make them dimorphic in an attractive way.
For example downward growth isn’t attractive. On the other hand a tall lower third cause by a tall ramus is attractive.

Like I don’t really understand what your both points are exactly? A woman chooses the man she feels attracted to. And this attraction is most of the time and to a big part based on his looks. Which means she is attracted to his genes. Because the more attractive you (Good Genes) the more women are attracted to you.

Tl;dr: Most mates women choose isnt out of sexual selection nowadays. If a women choose a masc chad to have sex with then yeah it is sexual selection.

 

[Kekee]

I dont think female selection dont exist at all what i am trying to say is most partners women choose nowadays isnt about good genes or sexual selection it is about how they feel about it tbh for example Justin Bieber wouldnt make a good hunter but he slayed nearly all supermodels.

Prime Bieber is genetically superior to any masc ogre you can think of.

Not only physically more appealing, but can also survive better in nature.

As if you need ogre muscles to survive in nature.

To survive in nature as a human, you need intelligence. Being ogre usually means Low IQ.

Since Bieber is only 5'7", he consumes less resources. Using less resources = higher chance of survival and more food to go towards your kids, wife.

Prime Bieber is genetically superior to all the ogres PSL aspies on here coom to. And no amount of copes will change that.

 

[germanlooks]

Most mates women choose isnt out of sexual selection nowadays

Out of what then?

If a women choose a masc chad to have sex with then yeah it is sexual selection.

Even if a woman chooses a gymmaxxed normie with square jaw it’s out of sexual selection. You don’t have to be the best on the genetic chain in order to attract women sexually. You as a man aren’t Stacy only as well.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Prime Bieber is genetically superior to any masc ogre you can think of.

View attachment 1354425

Not only physically more appealing, but can also survive better in nature.

As if you need ogre muscles to survive in nature.

To survive in nature as a human, you need intelligence. Being ogre usually means Low IQ.

Since Bieber is only 5'7", he consumes less resources. Using less resources = higher chance of survival and more food to go towards your kids, wife.

Prime Bieber is genetically superior to all the ogres PSL aspies on here coom to. And no amount of copes will change that.

View attachment 1354432
View attachment 1354435
View attachment 1354436

Are you letting Bieber's demigod-tier status and preselection influence your perception?

 

[Kekee]

Are you letting Bieber's demigod-tier status and preselection influence your perception?

Not at all.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Good genes theory is cope Indeed. When it suits blackpillers then "dimorphism is very important" when it doesn't then "it's a mix of things bro"

 

[Deleted member 5786]

Ok ok then I agree with you totally

Women are attracted to features the same way a female bird will pick males with bright colors. Its a fisherian runaway.

I misunderstood what you meant. Its total cope to believe "Chad" is somehow genetically superior.

I'll add tho that indicators of health (shoulder to waist ratio, large mandible, healthy hair, clear skin, greater size and fitness etc ) are actual preferences for a chance of survival.

Both preferences and evolutionary processes coexist i believe.

Cope. Size now doesn't matter. If you want to survive now, its all about face structure @PingPong

 

[Cigarette]

women dont realize theyre bisexual until they get fucked and dumped

 

[Deleted member 14323]

Cope. Size now doesn't matter. If you want to survive now, its all about face structure @PingPong

And NT haircuts

 

[Dorado]

Dude, different girls will have different tastes. Some lean more towards prettyboy and are more likely to be bisexual and others like masculinity and are less likely to be bisexual, still, most have at least some degree of same sex attraction. Usually JBs will like prettyboys the most and as they get older they start to appreciate masculity more.

 

[Deleted member 15338]

Dude, different girls will have different tastes. Some lean more towards prettyboy and are more likely to be bisexual and others like masculinity and are less likely to be bisexual, still, most have at least some degree of same sex attraction. Usually JBs will like prettyboys the most and as they get older they start to appreciate masculity more.

Good genes theory is cope Indeed. When it suits blackpillers then "dimorphism is very important" when it doesn't then "it's a mix of things bro"

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Dude, different girls will have different tastes. Some lean more towards prettyboy and are more likely to be bisexual and others like masculinity and are less likely to be bisexual, still, most have at least some degree of same sex attraction. Usually JBs will like prettyboys the most and as they get older they start to appreciate masculity more.

Lol that's why I say it doesn't make any sense. Take 10 men of 10 different age brackets and show them Megan Fox or any other Stacy and they will all agree they wanna fuck her at any age. With women this is not the case. It doesn't make sense because good genes should be good genes regardless of the girls age.

 

[Mrddi]

What's your opinion then

 

[Deleted member 5786]

What's your opinion then

@PingPong

 

[Deleted member 14323]

Women are just bisexual childs jfl if u believe things like female nature or female choice. Muh women are attracted to dimorphism, let's take a look at dimorphic traits:

-Long midface, unattractive.
-Big, wider, more downturned and long nose, unattractive.
-Lower ES ratio, unattractive.
-Lower midface ratio, unattractive
-Lower fwhr, unattractive.
-Facial hair, unattractive.
-Body hair, unattractive.
-Downward growth, unattractive.
-High gonial angle, unattractive.
-More recessed jaws, unattractive.
-Low canthal tilts, unattractive.
-More recessed maxillas, unattractive.
-Norwooding, unattractive.
-More acnes and worse skin overall, unattractive.
-Thin hair, unattractive.
-Dark triad/bad boy personality, attractive.
-Tall and square chin, attractive.
-Good height, frame and muscles, attractive.
-Vertically narrow eyes, attractive.

And ALL the counterparts of unattractive traits i counted are attractive to women. Then i come with the conclusion ALL women are bisexual and act on how they feel it is not about muh good genes or sexual selection jfl. In actual nature ogres would get the most pussy but they are not attractive to women, after all of these we can say female selection itself is a cope and a feminist lie, it never happened, NEVER.


Thoughts ? @MarkCorrigan @TraumatisedOgre @thecel @Theodore Bagwell @looksmaxxer234 @Frank Jack @n0rthface @germanlooks

@PingPong

 

[Deleted member 14781]

What's your opinion then

Men evolved to compete with each others and take all the women, women coevolved conceived ovulation to hide when they are fertile and mate with who they wanted. By doing this they (somewhat) gained back the power of reproduction. Even choosing males who are not too dimorphic would mean that they stay under the radar and the offsprings will not be killed by a hypermasc man since they are not seen as a threat. However, since lot of women evolved this preference then now not being very dimorphic is a plus. I'm theorizing of course but the "good genes" theory is the most low Iq cope I have ever read here.

 

[Mrddi]

Men evolved to compete with each others and take all the women, women coevolved conceived ovulation to hide when they are fertile and mate with who they wanted. By doing this they (somewhat) gained back the power of reproduction. Even choosing males who are not too dimorphic would mean that they stay under the radar and the offsprings will not be killed by a hypermasc man since they are not seen as a threat. However, since lot of women evolved this preference then now not being very dimorphic is a plus. I'm theorizing of course but the "good genes" theory is the most low Iq cope I have ever read here.

High IQ

 

[Deleted member 15338]

High IQ

Common sense

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Common sense

Common sense is not so common no more

 

[germanlooks]

Lol that's why I say it doesn't make any sense. Take 10 men of 10 different age brackets and show them Megan Fox or any other Stacy and they will all agree they wanna fuck her at any age. With women this is not the case. It doesn't make sense because good genes should be good genes regardless of the girls age.

Show any women no matter their age men like these and they all want to fuck them:

99% of women no matter their age would fuck all these men.
your theory doesn’t make sense

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Show any women no matter their age men like these and they all want to fuck them:
View attachment 1354835View attachment 1354836
View attachment 1354837View attachment 1354839View attachment 1354843
View attachment 1354846
99% of women no matter their age would fuck all these men.
your theory doesn’t make sense

I already done that, I showed Chico, Meeks, O'Pry and Barrett. Older women liked Meeks and didn't like Chico and Barrett. Younger women liked Chico more. I tell that they go from "he is super hot" to "he looks like shit"
Just to give you an example.

Ladies who is hotter Nikko Jenkins (left) or Jeremy Meeks (right) ?

I've been infatuated with Nikko Jenkins for awhile now. Too bad he's on death row for killing 4 peep during a 10 day spree, shortly after released...

www.girlsaskguys.com

My theory makes way more sense than "genetic superiority" bullshit, when you can't even define genetic superiority other than "women like him so he is superior"

 

[germanlooks]

I already done that, I showed Chico, Meeks, O'Pry and Barrett. Older women liked Meeks and didn't like Chico and Barrett. Younger women liked Chico more. I tell that they go from "he is super hot" to "he looks like shit"
Just to give you an example.

Water. Of corse will older women prefer a more mature/masculine looking man because that makes more sense since they are older themselves. But you are delusional if you think they still wouldn’t fuck Chico or Zach if they had the chance.

The same goes for men as well. As a teenager boy you also will find teenage girls more appealing than girl in their 20s. But you still would fuck both in the end of the day. And that applies to women as well.

My theory makes way more sense than "genetic superiority" bullshit, when you can't even define genetic superiority other than "women like him so he is superior"

genetic superiority in this age is just having a good looking face. That’s it. It doesn’t matter what makes the face good looking it only matters that it’s good looking.

And that means that for example prime Chico and prime Meeks are both around equally in genetic superiority. They both are good looking enough to have appeal to 99% of women

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Water. Of corse will older women prefer a more mature/masculine looking man because that makes more sense since they are older themselves. But you are delusional if you think they still wouldn’t fuck Chico or Zach if they had the chance.

The same goes for men as well. As a teenager boy you also will find teenage girls more appealing than girl in their 20s. But you still would fuck both in the end of the day. And that applies to women as well.

genetic superiority in this age is just having a good looking face. That’s it. It doesn’t matter what makes the face good looking it only matters that it’s good looking.

And that means that for example prime Chico and prime Meeks are both around equally in genetic superiority. They both are good looking enough to have appeal to 99% of women

Lol no, men prefer good looking young women, YOUNG being a key word. A 40 years old man will like a 16 years old as much as when he was 16. This doesn't happen for women. I don't think a woman who said she doesn't like him at all would fuck him tbh, if a woman likes very masculine men she would be repulsed by someone who looks like Chico. Same for women who like soft features, they would be repulsed by Jason Momoa. Genetic superiority means nothing, it's just a term thrown out that equals to "good looking" and that tries to explain why women like certain features and why certain features make you better, the problem is that this theory has holes as big as my house. You try to equate that being good looking to women = being smarter, better fighters, better at surviving skills, better at everything, and that's where my problem starts, because there is no proof of this. You have to say that to justify women and their choices, because you see then as a vehicle of natural selection, which they are not. I guarantee you that in prehistoric times it wasn't guys like Meeks or Chico who had harems.

 

[germanlooks]

Lol no, men prefer good looking young women, YOUNG being a key word. A 40 years old man will like a 16 years old as much as when he was 16. This doesn't happen for women.

Women prefer young looking men as well.
You fail to understand that looking young as a man doesn’t mean you are a pretty boy. Tyler Maher for example looks young became he has good skin and a good hairline but his face isn’t the face of a pretty boy. Which means he has appeal to every women from 16y-50y+.

I don't think a woman who said she doesn't like him at all would fuck him tbh, if a woman likes very masculine men she would be repulsed by someone who looks like Chico. Same for women who like soft features, they would be repulsed by Jason Momoa.

LOL the same applies to men jfl.
There are men who prefer more cute looking women and there are men who prefer more hot looking women. This basically the same thing. Not every man will like Eva Cudmore. And not every man will like Megan Fox

Genetic superiority means nothing, it's just a term thrown out that equals to "good looking" and that tries to explain why women like certain features and why certain features make you better, the problem is that this theory has holes as big as my house. You try to equate that being good looking to women = being smarter, better fighters, better at surviving skills, better at everything, and that's where my problem starts, because there is no proof of this

you don’t get it. Being good looking isn’t genetic superior because you are smarter, better fighter etc. Because that obv isn’t the case.
Being good looking is superior because in today’s age looks are the most important part for attraction. No woman will care if you are stronger than Chico because his face mogs yours and that is what counts. Your strength doesn’t help in today’s world because it’s no longer the strongest men who wins but the best looking one.

You have to say that to justify women and their choices, because you see then as a vehicle of natural selection, which they are not. I guarantee you that in prehistoric times it wasn't guys like Meeks or Chico who had harems.

As said before we don’t live in prehistoric times anymore.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Women prefer young looking men as well.
You fail to understand that looking young as a man doesn’t mean you are a pretty boy. Tyler Maher for example looks young became he has good skin and a good hairline but his face isn’t the face of a pretty boy. Which means he has appeal to every women from 16y-50y+.

LOL the same applies to men jfl.
There are men who prefer more cute looking women and there are men who prefer more hot looking women. This basically the same thing. Not every man will like Eva Cudmore. And not every man will like Megan Fox

you don’t get it. Being good looking isn’t genetic superior because you are smarter, better fighter etc. Because that obv isn’t the case.
Being good looking is superior because in today’s age looks are the most important part for attraction. No woman will care if you are stronger than Chico because his face mogs yours and that is what counts. Your strength doesn’t help in today’s world because it’s no longer the strongest men who wins but the best looking one.

As said before we don’t live in prehistoric times anymore.

Every man will find Eva Cudmore attractive, or Megan Fox. You will not see a shift, some will rate her a 8, some a 9, some a 10, but nobody a 3. I saw women rating Meeks a 3 and other a 10, same with Chico and Barrett, never tried Mahler tho, but I'm pretty positive it would be the same, if a woman doesn't like, for example, super strong jaws, she is gonna dislike everyone who has it (not every woman like men with 90 degrees of gonial angle like Mahler)

In today age being good looking is all that matters, I agree, but that's not genetic superiority, that's just simply living in an environment that favors that trait. The problem is that people here often argue that they are good looking BECAUSE they have better health, better surviving skills, better fighting skills and so on. This is utter nonsense, but this line of reasoning then follows that since they are so good at everything then society should let them procreate so humanity can evolve. Humanity will not evolve or become better if 60iq Jeremy Meeks has 1000 babies.

We are arguing about why women select those men and if their selection criteria will make society and humanity better, which i don't really think, I think that by pandering too much to their taste we will reach a point where even being a male model will not be enough.

 

[Mrddi]

Every man will find Eva Cudmore attractive, or Megan Fox. You will not see a shift, some will rate her a 8, some a 9, some a 10, but nobody a 3. I saw women rating Meeks a 3 and other a 10, same with Chico and Barrett, never tried Mahler tho, but I'm pretty positive it would be the same, if a woman doesn't like, for example, super strong jaws, she is gonna dislike everyone who has it (not every woman like men with 90 degrees of gonial angle like Mahler)

In today age being good looking is all that matters, I agree, but that's not genetic superiority, that's just simply living in an environment that favors that trait. The problem is that people here often argue that they are good looking BECAUSE they have better health, better surviving skills, better fighting skills and so on. This is utter nonsense, but this line of reasoning then follows that since they are so good at everything then society should let them procreate so humanity can evolve. Humanity will not evolve or become better if 60iq Jeremy Meeks has 1000 babies.

We are arguing about why women select those men and if their selection criteria will make society and humanity better, which i don't really think, I think that by pandering too much to their taste we will reach a point where even being a male model will not be enough.

Brutal the final sentence

 

[germanlooks]

Every man will find Eva Cudmore attractive, or Megan Fox. You will not see a shift, some will rate her a 8, some a 9, some a 10, but nobody a 3. I saw women rating Meeks a 3 and other a 10, same with Chico and Barrett,

Because women aren’t honest and cope hard. Jfl at believing what women say. No matter what your taste in men as a woman is you can’t rate Someone like meeks or Chico below average that’s just straight up lying. Even if they aren’t their type they still know that they are objectively good looking.

never tried Mahler tho, but I'm pretty positive it would be the same, if a woman doesn't like, for example, super strong jaws, she is gonna dislike everyone who has it (not every woman like men with 90 degrees of gonial angle like Mahler)

but the same goes for men as well.
Not every man like those extrem cat eyes Lima and Megan fox have. Some men prefer more preyish eyes. That’s the same like when a women prefers a slightly rounder Jawa than mahers jaw

In today age being good looking is all that matters, I agree, but that's not genetic superiority, that's just simply living in an environment that favors that trait. The problem is that people here often argue that they are good looking BECAUSE they have better health, better surviving skills, better fighting skills and so on. This is utter nonsense, but this line of reasoning then follows that since they are so good at everything then society should let them procreate so humanity can evolve. Humanity will not evolve or become better if 60iq Jeremy Meeks has 1000 babies.

Agree but being good looking still is an indicator of health to a big part as well.
For example better airways because of good facial growth, better skin etc

We are arguing about why women select those men

they just select them because their biology tells them that. A face like Mahers or Chico’s looks just more healthy and of good genetic quality than the face of a normie

 

[reptiles]

Women are just bisexual childs jfl if u believe things like female nature or female choice. Muh women are attracted to dimorphism, let's take a look at dimorphic traits:

-Long midface, unattractive.
-Big, wider, more downturned and long nose, unattractive.
-Lower ES ratio, unattractive.
-Lower midface ratio, unattractive
-Lower fwhr, unattractive.
-Facial hair, unattractive.
-Body hair, unattractive.
-Downward growth, unattractive.
-High gonial angle, unattractive.
-More recessed jaws, unattractive.
-Low canthal tilts, unattractive.
-More recessed maxillas, unattractive.
-Norwooding, unattractive.
-More acnes and worse skin overall, unattractive.
-Thin hair, unattractive.
-Dark triad/bad boy personality, attractive.
-Tall and square chin, attractive.
-Good height, frame and muscles, attractive.
-Vertically narrow eyes, attractive.

And ALL the counterparts of unattractive traits i counted are attractive to women. Then i come with the conclusion ALL women are bisexual and act on how they feel it is not about muh good genes or sexual selection jfl. In actual nature ogres would get the most pussy but they are not attractive to women, after all of these we can say female selection itself is a cope and a feminist lie, it never happened, NEVER.


Thoughts ? @MarkCorrigan @TraumatisedOgre @thecel @Theodore Bagwell @looksmaxxer234 @Frank Jack @n0rthface @germanlooks

Looks midface is a chad trait what are you in about.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Because women aren’t honest and cope hard. Jfl at believing what women say. No matter what your taste in men as a woman is you can’t rate Someone like meeks or Chico below average that’s just straight up lying. Even if they aren’t their type they still know that they are objectively good looking.

but the same goes for men as well.
Not every man like those extrem cat eyes Lima and Megan fox have. Some men prefer more preyish eyes. That’s the same like when a women prefers a slightly rounder Jawa than mahers jaw

Agree but being good looking still is an indicator of health to a big part as well.
For example better airways because of good facial growth, better skin etc

they just select them because their biology tells them that. A face like Mahers or Chico’s looks just more healthy and of good genetic quality than the face of a normie

When it suits you they are honest, when it doesn't they are coping. Why are they coping if they rate Meeks a 10 in the same sentence?

All men will find Lima and Fox attractive, maybe not to the same degree but they do. For women it's not, at least not in my experience. Did you see the link I posted? Those girls were simping for Nikko Jenkins over Jeremy Meeks in his mugshot pic.

Skin aside, the size and shape of your bones doesn't determine your health. A guy can be perfectly healthy with hunter eyes, prey eyes, large nose or pointy nose. There is no correlation between the size and shape of your bones and health. There are with prenatal T, but then you see women liking Chico who has overall mediocre bones (compared to other models), no browridge for example and not a very angular face.

Ok, but you don't explain "why" you just say that they are good looking because they look healthier (which I don't agree tbh)

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Ok, but you don't explain "why" you just say that they are good looking because they look healthier (which I don't agree tbh)

Health indicators are attractive characteristics for both sexes.
That's why we don't like obese people or pimply faces.
A good bone structure signals nose breathing and no recessions

 

[germanlooks]

When it suits you they are honest, when it doesn't they are coping. Why are they coping if they rate Meeks a 10 in the same sentence?

Those who rate him in the 7-10 range are honest because he is objectively good looking. If he wasn’t his mugshot wouldn’t have blown up. So those who rate him a 3 are coping subhumans who are just retarded.

All men will find Lima and Fox attractive

No. This site is a good evidence for this. Here are many users who don’t like lima and even think she looks like a tranny.

For women it's not, at least not in my experience. Did you see the link I posted? Those girls were simping for Nikko Jenkins over Jeremy Meeks in his mugshot pic.

those women are retarded and a minority. If you would go on the street with pictures of both and would ask normal women meeks would win hard and it wouldn’t be close

Skin aside, the size and shape of your bones doesn't determine your health. A guy can be perfectly healthy with hunter eyes, prey eyes, large nose or pointy nose. There is no correlation between the size and shape of your bones and health. There are with prenatal T, but then you see women liking Chico who has overall mediocre bones (compared to other models), no browridge for example and not a very angular face.

as I said it mainly doesn’t mean health but to some degrees it does like better airways for example

Ok, but you don't explain "why" you just say that they are good looking because they look healthier (which I don't agree tbh)

they are good looking because of symmetry, harmony, defined facial features, coloring, strong bones etc.

symmetry and harmony makes a face look healthier than a face with asymmetries and no harmony.

good coloring looks more healthy than bad coloring.

 

[Deleted member 4106]

There are with prenatal T, but then you see women liking Chico who has overall mediocre bones (compared to other models), no browridge for example and not a very angular face.

Chico has more appeal to younger women
While older women will prefer dimorphic men

 

[Deleted member 4106]

-Lower fwhr, unattractive

High fwhr is associated with higher levels of testosterone in men, it's literally the opposite of what you said.
Nor will I waste my time refuting the rest, most are simply not dimorphic traits

Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men

High facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has been associated with a cluster of behavioural traits in men, including aggression and status-striving. Th…

www.sciencedirect.com

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Health indicators are attractive characteristics for both sexes.
That's why we don't like obese people or pimply faces.
A good bone structure signals nose breathing and no recessions

Cheekbones don't signal anything, philtrum doesn't signal anything, ear size doesn't signal anything, but still we want those things to have some proportions.

Those who rate him in the 7-10 range are honest because he is objectively good looking. If he wasn’t his mugshot wouldn’t have blown up. So those who rate him a 3 are coping subhumans who are just retarded.

No. This site is a good evidence for this. Here are many users who don’t like lima and even think she looks like a tranny.

those women are retarded and a minority. If you would go on the street with pictures of both and would ask normal women meeks would win hard and it wouldn’t be close

as I said it mainly doesn’t mean health but to some degrees it does like better airways for example

they are good looking because of symmetry, harmony, defined facial features, coloring, strong bones etc.

symmetry and harmony makes a face look healthier than a face with asymmetries and no harmony.

good coloring looks more healthy than bad coloring.

No, some women just find him plain ugly. You can't say "they are coping" when in the next sentence they rate another male model a 10.

Never read something like that.

"These women are retarded" not an argument, It's on a website about asking girls about guys, not a Nikko Jenkins fanpage, it's unbiased.

Lot of bones are useless but they are attractive, cheekbones for example.

All abstract concepts without a pratical explanation as to why those things should be attractive. Harmony is an abstract concept, Chico doesn't have strong bones.

Normies are simmetrical too, and again nobody has every defined "Harmony"

Good coloring doesn't mean shit. In Africa being dark is better than being white, in Asia if you tan you are seen as subhuman.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Chico has more appeal to younger women
While older women will prefer dimorphic men

Why this?

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Cheekbones don't signal anything

Signal yes, I already explained

philtrum doesn't signal anything, ear size doesn't signal anything, but still we want those things to have some proportions.

Deformity, symmetry and proportion are beautiful features