Graphs to show the fate of all men and women in terms of their marriage partner(s)

[NumbThePain]

pat me

Pat pat. Now pat me

 

[Xangsane]

Pat pat. Now pat me

pat pat!!!!

pat you

 

[NumbThePain]

pat pat!!!!

pat you

Hmmmmmm

 

[Xangsane]

Hmmmmmm

pat pat!!!!

 

[enchanted_elixir]

pat me

pat pat

 

[Saint Casanova]

What about marrying an ugly woman or is that in the genetic dead end subpie?

 

[Xangsane]

pat pat

pat pat!!!!

 

[NumbThePain]

Elixy is sad @enchanted_elixir

 

[Xangsane]

What about marrying an ugly woman or is that in the genetic dead end subpie?

marrying an ugly woman - roastie

 

[Xangsane]

Elixy is sad @enchanted_elixir

View attachment 2638844

pat pat

 

[Deleted member 7580]

You’re gonna be beta buxx for your black wife ?

 

[Xangsane]

You’re gonna be beta buxx for your black wife ?

no no + she is mulatta

 

[NumbThePain]

 

[Xangsane]

View attachment 2638854

 

[emeraldglass]

@delonregen @Emeraldglass

Much much better, dont you think?

 

[Xangsane]

Much much better, dont you think?

Yes thank you!
Thoughts on the percentages and descriptions?

 

[Xangsane]

@DR. NICKGA @Bonesbonesbonesbone @Copexodius Maximus @datboijj @Reformed @FunkyFlamingo @SteveRogers @julian111 @GabachoCopium @orangomango2003

0

 

[SteveLorde]

Tbh, at this day and age, last thing civilization needs is marriage at all. Marriage or chasing marriage, yields more negatives than positives now, and it will drive you insane because of how super competitive you have to be to land a 5 or 6/10 woman

 

[Xangsane]

Tbh, at this day and age, last thing civilization needs is marriage at all. Marriage or chasing marriage, yields more negatives than positives now, and it will drive you insane because of how super competitive you have to be to land a 5 or 6/10 woman

And thoughts about how only 9% of women will actually marry their dream man?

 

[SteveLorde]

And thoughts about how only 9% of women will actually marry their dream man?

doesn't matter, even if they didn't marry dream man, they can suck money and power from others.

the issue is with modern societal standards and how highly they lift women, that their egos are massively inflated as result

 

[SteveLorde]

doesn't matter, even if they didn't marry dream man, they can suck money and power from others.

the issue is with modern societal standards and how highly they lift women, that their egos are massively inflated as result

and imo, only way to fix this is through driving down value of order and society in the country, when no man trusts other man, no woman can feel safe even if she lives in a palace with hundred guards, because the fabric of society and order is lost and you turn into a 3rd world shithole.

gloomy anarcho pov, but that's what it will take to return things back to normal

 

[SteveLorde]

and imo, only way to fix this is through driving down value of order and society in the country, when no man trusts other man, no woman can feel safe even if she lives in a palace with hundred guards, because the fabric of society and order is lost and you turn into a 3rd world shithole.

gloomy anarcho pov, but that's what it will take to return things back to normal

what's funny is that multiculturism and women these days are driving societies into 3rd world shitholes, they are slowly turning men into angry psychos and weak chads

 

[Xangsane]

what's funny is that multiculturism and women these days are driving societies into 3rd world shitholes, they are slowly turning men into angry psychos and weak chads

WDYM weak chads?

 

[Xangsane]

doesn't matter, even if they didn't marry dream man, they can suck money and power from others.

the issue is with modern societal standards and how highly they lift women, that their egos are massively inflated as result

Yeah it did predict some will marry rich oofies, and others betabuxxers. Most will end up with betabuxxers

 

[ReadBooksEveryday]

Men

View attachment 2638768

1. Marrying Average-Looking Women (70%): This is the most common scenario, reflecting the tendency of men, typically around LTN-weak HTN, to marry women of similar attractiveness.
2. Marrying Highly Attractive Women (15%): A smaller percentage of men marry highly attractive women (PSL 4.75+), likely due to the relative scarcity of such men compared to the abundance of attractive women.
3. Genetic Dead Ends (5%): This category represents a minority of men (below the 30th percentile or PSL below 3), who are less likely to marry due to perceived lower attractiveness.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing (5%): A strategy adopted by a small percentage of men, possibly as an alternative approach to finding a partner.
5. Men Choosing Not to Marry (5%): This represents men who have the option to marry but choose different life paths.

Women

View attachment 2638783

1. Marrying a Hot Man (8.5%): This category represents women who marry men rated PSL 4.75 or above, a relatively small fraction due to the scarcity of such highly attractive men.
2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (62.3%): This category suggests that a large proportion of women might marry for reasons such as financial stability or security, especially given the relative rarity of highly attractive men.
3. Becoming Cat Women (10%): This category includes women who choose not to marry or cannot find a suitable partner, indicating a preference or acceptance of singlehood, possibly with pets as companions.
4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man (4.3%): This category represents a small portion of women marrying upper-class men who may not be particularly attractive but offer financial and social stability.
5. Become a Single Mother (15%): This category accounts for a significant proportion of women. This choice reflects women who have children independently, either through choice or circumstance, without a marital or long-term partner.

Okay I see the graphs but can you explain what this data means?

And make some conclusions based on the data..

 

[Xangsane]

Okay I see the graphs but can you explain what this data means?

And make some conclusions based on the data..

Men's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying Average-Looking Women (70%)​

• Characteristics: These men typically possess average physical and social attributes, and their partners mirror this averageness. They often lack the standout LMS traits to attract top-tier women and may have modest socio-economic backgrounds. Their relationships are usually a result of matching within their social and attractiveness level due to limited options.

2. Marrying Highly Attractive Women (15%)​

• Characteristics (Hot HTN+ Men): These men stand out for their physical attractiveness, but their social skills may range from charismatic to socially awkward. Despite this variance, their exceptional looks are a significant factor in attracting women. Their partners, slightly less attractive but still above average (most often ranging from very high-end MTB to very low-end Stacylite) and are almost never overweight, often compensate with qualities like loyalty, emotional support, and nurturing behavior, making them compatible long-term partners.
• Characteristics (Wealthy, High-Status Men): These men may be average in looks but possess significant wealth or status. They either attract high-end Stacylites to Stacies, who are drawn to the stability and lifestyle these men offer, or MTB and below women who were born into aristocracy.

3. Genetic Dead Ends (5%)​

• Characteristics: Men in this category are significantly below average in attractiveness and may also struggle with unfavorable social or personality traits. They face an uphill battle in the dating market due to stringent standards set by women seeking more attractive or higher-status partners.

4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing (5%)​

• Characteristics: Feeling disadvantaged in their native dating scenes, these men, typically average or below-average in looks or status, opt to relocate to environments with lower socioeconomic status where they perceive a comparative advantage. This strategy is a response to the competitive and often unforgiving nature of Western dating markets.

5. Men Choosing Not to Marry (5%)​

• Characteristics: This diverse group ranges from men disillusioned with contemporary relationship dynamics to those preferring personal freedom and casual relationships. They might possess some form of LMS but are wary of the perceived constraints or risks of marriage.

​

Women's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying a Hot Man (8.5%)​

• Characteristics: Women marrying highly attractive men (HTN+) often possess above-average attractiveness (but are not Stacies or high-end Stacylites), coupled with standout qualities like emotional intelligence and nurturing behavior. These traits, along with a strong alignment with the men's personal values and interests, make them appealing to HTN+ men seeking more than just physical beauty. Their attentiveness and support offer a balanced dynamic, highlighting that for these men, choosing a long-term partner involves a blend of physical appeal and deep emotional and intellectual compatibility.

2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (62.3%)​

• Characteristics: These women, often unable to secure commitment from HTN+ men either due to their lower SMV, or if Stacylite+, those HTN+ men didn't want to enter an LTR with them due to their toxicity, are compelled to settle for stable, resourceful men. Their choice is not so much pragmatic as it is a forced compromise, reflecting the reality of their declining options and the high value placed on security and stability as they age.

3. Becoming Cat Women (10%)​

• Characteristics: This group comprises of women who set unrealistically high standards (blame Wattpad, IG, dating apps and TikTok) or are unable to attract male interest, this group either overestimates their market value or faces difficulties due to less desirable traits. Their situation is a consequence of misaligned expectations and market realities.

4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man (4.3%)​

• Characteristics: This category includes women of all looks levels from affluent backgrounds marrying within their social class and attractive (high-end Stacylite and above) women who prioritize wealth and status over looks. These women make calculated decisions, valuing a high-status lifestyle over physical attraction.

5. Become a Single Mother (15%)​

• Characteristics: This group encompasses women who voluntarily choose motherhood independently and those who engage with attractive men but couldn't secure commitment. This reflects either a preference for independence or the outcome of failed attempts to lock down a desirable partner.

Conclusion​

• The dynamics in the dating market are influenced by a combination of physical attractiveness, social status, and strategic mating choices.
• High female standards and hypergamous tendencies significantly shape these dynamics, with women, especially Stacies, making choices that prioritize long-term security over immediate physical attraction.
• Men and women make strategic choices based on a complex interplay of desirability, availability, and societal norms, within a framework that emphasizes the challenges posed by high standards and hypergamy.

 

[MoggerGaston]

conclusion:

mgtow is the only way

 

[Xangsane]

Conclusion with Vedic Astrology Perspective​

From a Vedic Astrology standpoint, which often delves into predictions about life events including marriage, there's an interesting angle on the nature of relationships. It suggests that the vast majority of people, both men and women, are destined to marry partners who are sub-HTN in terms of attractiveness. This aligns with the concept that most individuals find partners within a similar range of physical appeal, reflecting a more balanced and realistic approach to relationships.

Additionally, in cases where individuals are predicted to marry someone highly attractive (representing about 10% of results), there are interesting caps on these predictions. For women, the highest level of attractiveness they are likely to marry into is often capped at the Chadlite level, which indicates men who are quite attractive but not at the pinnacle of the attractiveness scale. For men, the cap is often at the Stacylite level, suggesting that while they may marry someone attractive, it's typically not someone at the very top tier of female beauty.

 

[Xangsane]

conclusion:

mgtow is the only way

Men's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying Average-Looking Women (70%)​

• Characteristics: These men typically possess average physical and social attributes, and their partners mirror this averageness. They often lack the standout LMS traits to attract top-tier women and may have modest socio-economic backgrounds. Their relationships are usually a result of matching within their social and attractiveness level due to limited options.

2. Marrying Highly Attractive Women (15%)​

• Characteristics (Hot HTN+ Men): These men stand out for their physical attractiveness, but their social skills may range from charismatic to socially awkward. Despite this variance, their exceptional looks are a significant factor in attracting women. Their partners, slightly less attractive but still above average (most often ranging from very high-end MTB to very low-end Stacylite) and are almost never overweight, often compensate with qualities like loyalty, emotional support, and nurturing behavior, making them compatible long-term partners.
• Characteristics (Wealthy, High-Status Men): These men may be average in looks but possess significant wealth or status. They either attract high-end Stacylites to Stacies, who are drawn to the stability and lifestyle these men offer, or MTB and below women who were born into aristocracy.

3. Genetic Dead Ends (5%)​

• Characteristics: Men in this category are significantly below average in attractiveness and may also struggle with unfavorable social or personality traits. They face an uphill battle in the dating market due to stringent standards set by women seeking more attractive or higher-status partners.

4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing (5%)​

• Characteristics: Feeling disadvantaged in their native dating scenes, these men, typically average or below-average in looks or status, opt to relocate to environments with lower socioeconomic status where they perceive a comparative advantage. This strategy is a response to the competitive and often unforgiving nature of Western dating markets.

5. Men Choosing Not to Marry (5%)​

• Characteristics: This diverse group ranges from men disillusioned with contemporary relationship dynamics to those preferring personal freedom and casual relationships. They might possess some form of LMS but are wary of the perceived constraints or risks of marriage.

​

Women's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying a Hot Man (8.5%)​

• Characteristics: Women marrying highly attractive men (HTN+) often possess above-average attractiveness (but are not Stacies or high-end Stacylites), coupled with standout qualities like emotional intelligence and nurturing behavior. These traits, along with a strong alignment with the men's personal values and interests, make them appealing to HTN+ men seeking more than just physical beauty. Their attentiveness and support offer a balanced dynamic, highlighting that for these men, choosing a long-term partner involves a blend of physical appeal and deep emotional and intellectual compatibility.

2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (62.3%)​

• Characteristics: These women, often unable to secure commitment from HTN+ men either due to their lower SMV, or if Stacylite+, those HTN+ men didn't want to enter an LTR with them due to their toxicity, are compelled to settle for stable, resourceful men. Their choice is not so much pragmatic as it is a forced compromise, reflecting the reality of their declining options and the high value placed on security and stability as they age.

3. Becoming Cat Women (10%)​

• Characteristics: This group comprises of women who set unrealistically high standards (blame Wattpad, IG, dating apps and TikTok) or are unable to attract male interest, this group either overestimates their market value or faces difficulties due to less desirable traits. Their situation is a consequence of misaligned expectations and market realities.

4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man (4.3%)​

• Characteristics: This category includes women of all looks levels from affluent backgrounds marrying within their social class and attractive (high-end Stacylite and above) women who prioritize wealth and status over looks. These women make calculated decisions, valuing a high-status lifestyle over physical attraction.

5. Become a Single Mother (15%)​

• Characteristics: This group encompasses women who voluntarily choose motherhood independently and those who engage with attractive men but couldn't secure commitment. This reflects either a preference for independence or the outcome of failed attempts to lock down a desirable partner.

Conclusion​

• The dynamics in the dating market are influenced by a combination of physical attractiveness, social status, and strategic mating choices.
• High female standards and hypergamous tendencies significantly shape these dynamics, with women, especially Stacies, making choices that prioritize long-term security over immediate physical attraction.
• Men and women make strategic choices based on a complex interplay of desirability, availability, and societal norms, within a framework that emphasizes the challenges posed by high standards and hypergamy.

Conclusion with Vedic Astrology Perspective​

From a Vedic Astrology standpoint, which often delves into predictions about life events including marriage, there's an interesting angle on the nature of relationships. It suggests that the vast majority of people, both men and women, are destined to marry partners who are sub-HTN in terms of attractiveness. This aligns with the concept that most individuals find partners within a similar range of physical appeal, reflecting a more balanced and realistic approach to relationships.

Additionally, in cases where individuals are predicted to marry someone highly attractive (representing about 10% of results), there are interesting caps on these predictions. For women, the highest level of attractiveness they are likely to marry into is often capped at the Chadlite level, which indicates men who are quite attractive but not at the pinnacle of the attractiveness scale. For men, the cap is often at the Stacylite level, suggesting that while they may marry someone attractive, it's typically not someone at the very top tier of female beauty.

 

[MoggerGaston]

yeah, my conclusion is the same but in fewer words.

ill never date sub HTB
I am already settling HARD by not demanding JB+Virginity on top of that.

women have ruined everything

 

[Xangsane]

yeah, my conclusion is the same but in fewer words.

ill never date sub HTB
I am already settling HARD by not demanding JB+Virginity on top of that.

women have ruined everything

Are you ready?

CLICK HERE TO GET A HYPER-ACCURATE PREDICTION OF YOUR WIFE'S APPEARANCE, BODY, DATING HISTORY AND BODY COUNT

This is haram astagfirullah

looksmax.org

 

[Xangsane]

Men's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying Average-Looking Women (70%)​

• Characteristics: These men typically possess average physical and social attributes, and their partners mirror this averageness. They often lack the standout LMS traits to attract top-tier women and may have modest socio-economic backgrounds. Their relationships are usually a result of matching within their social and attractiveness level due to limited options.

2. Marrying Highly Attractive Women (15%)​

• Characteristics (Hot HTN+ Men): These men stand out for their physical attractiveness, but their social skills may range from charismatic to socially awkward. Despite this variance, their exceptional looks are a significant factor in attracting women. Their partners, slightly less attractive but still above average (most often ranging from very high-end MTB to very low-end Stacylite) and are almost never overweight, often compensate with qualities like loyalty, emotional support, and nurturing behavior, making them compatible long-term partners.
• Characteristics (Wealthy, High-Status Men): These men may be average in looks but possess significant wealth or status. They either attract high-end Stacylites to Stacies, who are drawn to the stability and lifestyle these men offer, or MTB and below women who were born into aristocracy.

3. Genetic Dead Ends (5%)​

• Characteristics: Men in this category are significantly below average in attractiveness and may also struggle with unfavorable social or personality traits. They face an uphill battle in the dating market due to stringent standards set by women seeking more attractive or higher-status partners.

4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing (5%)​

• Characteristics: Feeling disadvantaged in their native dating scenes, these men, typically average or below-average in looks or status, opt to relocate to environments with lower socioeconomic status where they perceive a comparative advantage. This strategy is a response to the competitive and often unforgiving nature of Western dating markets.

5. Men Choosing Not to Marry (5%)​

• Characteristics: This diverse group ranges from men disillusioned with contemporary relationship dynamics to those preferring personal freedom and casual relationships. They might possess some form of LMS but are wary of the perceived constraints or risks of marriage.

​

Women's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying a Hot Man (8.5%)​

• Characteristics: Women marrying highly attractive men (HTN+) often possess above-average attractiveness (but are not Stacies or high-end Stacylites), coupled with standout qualities like emotional intelligence and nurturing behavior. These traits, along with a strong alignment with the men's personal values and interests, make them appealing to HTN+ men seeking more than just physical beauty. Their attentiveness and support offer a balanced dynamic, highlighting that for these men, choosing a long-term partner involves a blend of physical appeal and deep emotional and intellectual compatibility.

2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (62.3%)​

• Characteristics: These women, often unable to secure commitment from HTN+ men either due to their lower SMV, or if Stacylite+, those HTN+ men didn't want to enter an LTR with them due to their toxicity, are compelled to settle for stable, resourceful men. Their choice is not so much pragmatic as it is a forced compromise, reflecting the reality of their declining options and the high value placed on security and stability as they age.

3. Becoming Cat Women (10%)​

• Characteristics: This group comprises of women who set unrealistically high standards (blame Wattpad, IG, dating apps and TikTok) or are unable to attract male interest, this group either overestimates their market value or faces difficulties due to less desirable traits. Their situation is a consequence of misaligned expectations and market realities.

4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man (4.3%)​

• Characteristics: This category includes women of all looks levels from affluent backgrounds marrying within their social class and attractive (high-end Stacylite and above) women who prioritize wealth and status over looks. These women make calculated decisions, valuing a high-status lifestyle over physical attraction.

5. Become a Single Mother (15%)​

• Characteristics: This group encompasses women who voluntarily choose motherhood independently and those who engage with attractive men but couldn't secure commitment. This reflects either a preference for independence or the outcome of failed attempts to lock down a desirable partner.

Conclusion​

• The dynamics in the dating market are influenced by a combination of physical attractiveness, social status, and strategic mating choices.
• High female standards and hypergamous tendencies significantly shape these dynamics, with women, especially Stacies, making choices that prioritize long-term security over immediate physical attraction.
• Men and women make strategic choices based on a complex interplay of desirability, availability, and societal norms, within a framework that emphasizes the challenges posed by high standards and hypergamy.

@delonregen

 

[Graham]

LTN-weak HTN

That variation of looks is huge.

 

[Xangsane]

That variation of looks is huge.

still considered "meh" by most women

 

[Graham]

still considered "meh" by most women

No, a HTN at 6'0+ is IRL basically a chad.

 

[Xangsane]

No, a HTN at 6'0+ is IRL basically a chad.

hence strong HTN

 

[Xangsane]

@delonregen did I get the distributions more accurately

 

[New Poster]

next level autism

 

[Deleted member 30037]

@delonregen did I get the distributions more accurately

Yeah the only one off is the marrying highly attractive women, 15% is a bit too high Imo

 

[Xangsane]

Yeah the only one off is the marrying highly attractive women, 15% is a bit too high Imo

How would you change this?

 

[Deleted member 30037]

How would you change this?

Lower it to 10 and then add 5% to either marry mtb OR the couldn’t find someone

 

[Xangsane]

Lower it to 10 and then add 5% to either marry mtb OR the couldn’t find someone

and the women's section?

 

[Deleted member 30037]

and the women's section?

Looks good

 

[Xangsane]

Looks good

Thanks, thoughts about the analysis part?

 

[Xangsane]

Men's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying Average-Looking Women (70%)​

• Characteristics: These men typically possess average physical and social attributes, and their partners mirror this averageness. They often lack the standout LMS traits to attract top-tier women and may have modest socio-economic backgrounds. Their relationships are usually a result of matching within their social and attractiveness level due to limited options.

2. Marrying Highly Attractive Women (15%)​

• Characteristics (Hot HTN+ Men): These men stand out for their physical attractiveness, but their social skills may range from charismatic to socially awkward. Despite this variance, their exceptional looks are a significant factor in attracting women. Their partners, slightly less attractive but still above average (most often ranging from very high-end MTB to very low-end Stacylite) and are almost never overweight, often compensate with qualities like loyalty, emotional support, and nurturing behavior, making them compatible long-term partners.
• Characteristics (Wealthy, High-Status Men): These men may be average in looks but possess significant wealth or status. They either attract high-end Stacylites to Stacies, who are drawn to the stability and lifestyle these men offer, or MTB and below women who were born into aristocracy.

3. Genetic Dead Ends (5%)​

• Characteristics: Men in this category are significantly below average in attractiveness and may also struggle with unfavorable social or personality traits. They face an uphill battle in the dating market due to stringent standards set by women seeking more attractive or higher-status partners.

4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing (5%)​

• Characteristics: Feeling disadvantaged in their native dating scenes, these men, typically average or below-average in looks or status, opt to relocate to environments with lower socioeconomic status where they perceive a comparative advantage. This strategy is a response to the competitive and often unforgiving nature of Western dating markets.

5. Men Choosing Not to Marry (5%)​

• Characteristics: This diverse group ranges from men disillusioned with contemporary relationship dynamics to those preferring personal freedom and casual relationships. They might possess some form of LMS but are wary of the perceived constraints or risks of marriage.

​

Women's Categories Analysis​

1. Marrying a Hot Man (8.5%)​

• Characteristics: Women marrying highly attractive men (HTN+) often possess above-average attractiveness (but are not Stacies or high-end Stacylites), coupled with standout qualities like emotional intelligence and nurturing behavior. These traits, along with a strong alignment with the men's personal values and interests, make them appealing to HTN+ men seeking more than just physical beauty. Their attentiveness and support offer a balanced dynamic, highlighting that for these men, choosing a long-term partner involves a blend of physical appeal and deep emotional and intellectual compatibility.

2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (62.3%)​

• Characteristics: These women, often unable to secure commitment from HTN+ men either due to their lower SMV, or if Stacylite+, those HTN+ men didn't want to enter an LTR with them due to their toxicity, are compelled to settle for stable, resourceful men. Their choice is not so much pragmatic as it is a forced compromise, reflecting the reality of their declining options and the high value placed on security and stability as they age.

3. Becoming Cat Women (10%)​

• Characteristics: This group comprises of women who set unrealistically high standards (blame Wattpad, IG, dating apps and TikTok) or are unable to attract male interest, this group either overestimates their market value or faces difficulties due to less desirable traits. Their situation is a consequence of misaligned expectations and market realities.

4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man (4.3%)​

• Characteristics: This category includes women of all looks levels from affluent backgrounds marrying within their social class and attractive (high-end Stacylite and above) women who prioritize wealth and status over looks. These women make calculated decisions, valuing a high-status lifestyle over physical attraction.

5. Become a Single Mother (15%)​

• Characteristics: This group encompasses women who voluntarily choose motherhood independently and those who engage with attractive men but couldn't secure commitment. This reflects either a preference for independence or the outcome of failed attempts to lock down a desirable partner.

Conclusion​

• The dynamics in the dating market are influenced by a combination of physical attractiveness, social status, and strategic mating choices.
• High female standards and hypergamous tendencies significantly shape these dynamics, with women, especially Stacies, making choices that prioritize long-term security over immediate physical attraction.
• Men and women make strategic choices based on a complex interplay of desirability, availability, and societal norms, within a framework that emphasizes the challenges posed by high standards and hypergamy.

Looks good

Thanks, thoughts about the analysis part?

 

[Xangsane]

Men

View attachment 2638768

1. Marrying Average-Looking Women (70%): This is the most common scenario, reflecting the tendency of men, typically around LTN-weak HTN, to marry women of similar attractiveness.
2. Marrying Highly Attractive Women (15%): A smaller percentage of men marry highly attractive women (PSL 4.75+), likely due to the relative scarcity of such men compared to the abundance of attractive women.
3. Genetic Dead Ends (5%): This category represents a minority of men (below the 30th percentile or PSL below 3), who are less likely to marry due to perceived lower attractiveness.
4. Geomaxxing/SEAmaxxing (5%): A strategy adopted by a small percentage of men, possibly as an alternative approach to finding a partner.
5. Men Choosing Not to Marry (5%): This represents men who have the option to marry but choose different life paths.

Women

View attachment 2638783

1. Marrying a Hot Man (8.5%): This category represents women who marry men rated PSL 4.75 or above, a relatively small fraction due to the scarcity of such highly attractive men.
2. Marrying a Betabuxxer (62.3%): This category suggests that a large proportion of women might marry for reasons such as financial stability or security, especially given the relative rarity of highly attractive men.
3. Becoming Cat Women (10%): This category includes women who choose not to marry or cannot find a suitable partner, indicating a preference or acceptance of singlehood, possibly with pets as companions.
4. Marrying a Rich, Average-Looking, Upper-Class Man (4.3%): This category represents a small portion of women marrying upper-class men who may not be particularly attractive but offer financial and social stability.
5. Become a Single Mother (15%): This category accounts for a significant proportion of women. This choice reflects women who have children independently, either through choice or circumstance, without a marital or long-term partner.

@NattyMikeO @longmidfaceCEO

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

Yeah the only one off is the marrying highly attractive women, 15% is a bit too high Imo

Why?

 

[Deleted member 30037]

By good looking do you mean HTN+?

So chadlite would be even more rare

 

[Xangsane]

By good looking do you mean HTN+?

So chadlite would be even more rare

Yes, HTN+
Why even more rare

 

[Deleted member 30037]

I think you should lower the marry GL men. It’s lower than 8%. I think globally less than 8% of men are HTN/Chadlite/Chad

Yes, HTN+
Why even more rare