GTFIH BRUTAL Evisceration of Islam

If i got a dollar everytime a Christian takes a Quranic verse out of context I'd be a billionaire
 
  • +1
Reactions: arabcelxxx
Biggest incel trait is debating religion on incel websites. Go spend time with ur love ones. Go for a walk. Pet ur dog. Jerk off to porn. Literally anything else is a better use of time
these incels have no life, pornaddicted but still blames Islam for no reason, giggity
 
  • +1
Reactions: tombradylover
these incels have no life, pornaddicted but still blames Islam for no reason, giggity
Nobody blames Islam for inceldom or porn addiction or anything like that. These threads wouldn’t exist if you faggot Mudslimes stopped trying to run dawist nonsense on this site then we Christian’s wouldnt have to expose your filthy satanic death cult
 
@JohnDoe blame yourself for this now I’m going to fuck your religion the same way Mohammed fucked an 9yr old girl

"Surah 3:151: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve (all non-Muslims) …"Surah 2:191: "And kill them (non-Muslims) wherever you find them … kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers (non-Muslims).

"Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush …

“Sahih al-Bukhari 4557Narrated Abu Huraira:The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
Apostasy is a Hudood crime. Execution is traditional punishment for both genders of Muslim apostates. Ja'fari – Male apostates must be executed, while a female apostate must be held in solitary confinement till she repents and returns to Islam.

Sahih al-Bukhari 6922Narrated `Ikrima:Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to `Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn `Abbas who said, "If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) forbade it, saying, 'Do not punish anybody with Allah's punishment (fire).' I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'"

@yeeyeeslayer @Michael Myers @SecularIslamist I’m sorry had to do this but I’m sick of the Islamic lies because without lies Islam dies @Donquixote @i_love_roosters @maou
Where’s the Evisceration?All i see is Islam being based jfl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: noobkiller999
These verses were revealed during the war with the unbelievers ritarded christcuck
 
These verses were revealed during the war with the unbelievers ritarded christcuck
Nope. These verses were revealed even before then. They were revealed once Mo was rejected by Jew and Christian your pedo prophet used to attack poor pagans rob them and hurt them and Jews
 
Nope. These verses were revealed even before then. They were revealed once Mo was rejected by Jew and Christian your pedo prophet used to attack poor pagans rob them and hurt them and Jews
nga didn't read Quran and sayin something, man just sthu
 
nga didn't read Quran and sayin something, man just sthu
How about no? How about you learn what your prophet said and learn how your hadiths are fucking memes. Your gay book says Mohammed split the moon in 2 and yet the whole world didn’t notice :ROFLMAO:

Your book mentions men sucking the breasts of their wives to get milk as I showed @Michael Myers who can’t even deny it either as he has seen the truth lol

Don’t forget when you yawn to do it slightly as shaytan laughs :forcedsmile:. Oh and when you have nightmares don’t forget to spit 3 times behind you to irritate shaytan. There’s so many more but your religion is a meme
 
How about no? How about you learn what your prophet said and learn how your hadiths are fucking memes. Your gay book says Mohammed split the moon in 2 and yet the whole world didn’t notice :ROFLMAO:

Your book mentions men sucking the breasts of their wives to get milk as I showed @Michael Myers who can’t even deny it either as he has seen the truth lol

Don’t forget when you yawn to do it slightly as shaytan laughs :forcedsmile:. Oh and when you have nightmares don’t forget to spit 3 times behind you to irritate shaytan. There’s so many more but your religion is a meme
Hadith, dalil??
 
Hadith, dalil??
What Hadith? You want the Hadith for what I said? Just ask and you’ll recieve just don’t come crying to me once I show you :ROFLMAO:
 
Your book mentions men sucking the breasts of their wives to get milk as I showed @
Michael Myers
@Michael Myers who can’t even deny it either as he has seen the truth lol
That’s not in the Quran bhai. :hnghn:
 
This Jewish pawn larp is getting very high effort

Dn read a single partial tbh

1718569986256
 
Unironically yes.
The story of the adulterous woman in the gospels and antinomian (anti-moses) sentiments were a cuck's later insert to the Bible. As it was intended she would have gotten stoned, it's merely a perversion of the texts that justifies her not being stoned for adultery.
 
The story of the adulterous woman in the gospels and antinomian (anti-moses) sentiments were a cuck's later insert to the Bible. As it was intended she would have gotten stoned, it's merely a perversion of the texts that justifies her not being stoned for adultery.
The woman wasn’t an adulterer though… and the point was “how can you cast judgment when you yourself are riddled by sin” which is true. You don’t know much about the bible or Christianity that’s why you still think we must adhere to the Mosaic law despite Peter and Paul stating not to in Galatians and Corinthians. Even Jesus states he’s the mosaic law manifest and he has come to end that law.

Fun fact in China the story of John 8:5 where Jesus lets the adulterous woman leave without casting a stone is changed to Jesus stoning her LOL. But as I tell people who have an issue with Jesus’s purity all I can say is “find yourself another religion that allows for your deplorable evil actions”
 
I thought you meant to refer to holy book. You meant the meme book. :feelshah:
I mean both are meme books (hadiths just more so) and as a Muslim you need Hadiths to make contextual sense of the Quran and your prophets life so Muslims are fucked in this regard. The Quran is a meme book because it gets facts wrong :forcedsmile: and unlike the bible any error discredits Islam because you guys see it as the verbatim words of god whist is Christian’s we the bible as the INSPIRED word of god.

For instance your Allah has body parts like 2 right hands a shin a blouse and multiple eyes. This means Allah cannot be Lord of creation as he has a shape which means he occupies space which means something existed before him.

Another example is Allah veiling the world from his glory with light. Light is created and yet it can hold back Allah? But if Allah can overpower the light but chooses to limit his power to not blast humans with his glory why doesn’t he just limit his power to NOT blast humans? Making the veil silly.

I could also go on about how the seven stories of Adam and Eve are essentially different stories despite the Quran trying to make them be the same lol.

I could go on about how Allah gets the trinity wrong (says we worship Allah, Jesus and Mary JFL :ROFLMAO:). Hell many verses in the Quran were placed there because Mohammed was pissed off by somebody one of the daily prayers many Muslims recite is him cursing a woman and her husband for him not believing in Mohammed. Why would Allah care to put this in his book? :forcedsmile:

Honestly bro I can go on but the Quran is ahistorical, Anti Archological and anti factual book that even disagrees with facts such as Jesus’s death and resserection when every single non bias source from agnostics, atheists, Jews, romans, Greeks and modern scholars and historians and archeological experts agree. The only people who disagree that Jesus was killed and put in a Tomb ARE MUSLIMS. This is called the Quranic Dilemma.
 
I mean both are meme books (hadiths just more so) and as a Muslim you need Hadiths to make contextual sense of the Quran and your prophets life so Muslims are fucked in this regard. The Quran is a meme book because it gets facts wrong :forcedsmile: and unlike the bible any error discredits Islam because you guys see it as the verbatim words of god whist is Christian’s we the bible as the INSPIRED word of god.

For instance your Allah has body parts like 2 right hands a shin a blouse and multiple eyes. This means Allah cannot be Lord of creation as he has a shape which means he occupies space which means something existed before him.

Another example is Allah veiling the world from his glory with light. Light is created and yet it can hold back Allah? But if Allah can overpower the light but chooses to limit his power to not blast humans with his glory why doesn’t he just limit his power to NOT blast humans? Making the veil silly.

I could also go on about how the seven stories of Adam and Eve are essentially different stories despite the Quran trying to make them be the same lol.

I could go on about how Allah gets the trinity wrong (says we worship Allah, Jesus and Mary JFL :ROFLMAO:). Hell many verses in the Quran were placed there because Mohammed was pissed off by somebody one of the daily prayers many Muslims recite is him cursing a woman and her husband for him not believing in Mohammed. Why would Allah care to put this in his book? :forcedsmile:

Honestly bro I can go on but the Quran is ahistorical, Anti Archological and anti factual book that even disagrees with facts such as Jesus’s death and resserection when every single non bias source from agnostics, atheists, Jews, romans, Greeks and modern scholars and historians and archeological experts agree. The only people who disagree that Jesus was killed and put in a Tomb ARE MUSLIMS. This is called the Quranic Dilemma.
Bhai this is a mega cope. :hnghn: The meme books are the ones that talk about stoning monkeys for pre-marital sex or claiming the prophet married a prepubescent kid. 💀
 
Bhai this is a mega cope. :hnghn: The meme books are the ones that talk about stoning monkeys for pre-marital sex or claiming the prophet married a prepubescent kid. 💀
Did you not read what I wrote if your Quran makes mistakes then it’s OVER 4 YOU which it does therefore it’s also a meme book. Don’t forget the Quran allows for the dex of prepubescent girls lol 😂 shit like that is why the Quran is also a meme book it’s jsut not that much of a meme book but it is still
 
Did you not read what I wrote if your Quran makes mistakes then it’s OVER 4 YOU which it does therefore it’s also a meme book. Don’t forget the Quran allows for the dex of prepubescent girls lol 😂 shit like that is why the Quran is also a meme book it’s jsut not that much of a meme book but it is still
I couldn't read it after you claimed it was a meme book so I dunno what you exactly wrote. And I have read the Qur'an in English, I recall zero verses where prepubescent girls are talked about in a (sexual manner?). Is that what you were trying to say with "dex"?
 
I couldn't read it after you claimed it was a meme book so I dunno what you exactly wrote. And I have read the Qur'an in English, I recall zero verses where prepubescent girls are talked about in a (sexual manner?). Is that what you were trying to say with "dex"?
It is the chapter about the Iddah period

And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women - if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated. And for those who are pregnant, their term is until they give birth.1And whoever fears Allāh - He will make for him of his matter ease.
— Saheeh International

According to the quran, divorced prepubescent girls have to observe the waiting period (iddah) (2:228, 65:4) which is only reserved for those who have indeed consummated the marriage (33:49). So sex with prepubescent girls is allowed if we go only with the Quran, and it does not specify a minimum age.

 
The woman wasn’t an adulterer though… and the point was “how can you cast judgment when you yourself are riddled by sin” which is true.
You are supposed to cast judgement when it's in righteousness, this is irrelevant as that defense can be used in regards to literally anything ("only God can judge me!"). Falling short of perfection in your case does not mean that you don't rebuke and judge others.
And the story is not even present in earlier manuscripts, neither are other passages that imply the doctrines present at the times of the copyists (my personal theory is that in this case, it'd have simply been a hassle to keep stoning whores all the time so passages were added onto the Bible).

That's why scholarly renderings of the Bible add the comment that this story is not previously present.

Along with some other changes that are not present in any other of the gospels

You don’t know much about the bible or Christianity that’s why you still think we must adhere to the Mosaic law despite Peter and Paul stating not to in Galatians and Corinthians. Even Jesus states he’s the mosaic law manifest and he has come to end that law.
They did not though. Peter definitely did not say anything close to that and Paul's seemingly antinomian rhetoric does not really mean what you think it does. Modern scholarly consensus is that Paul did not intend to stop the laws regarding the feasts, unclean foods or sabbath. The gospels contain passages in support of the Torah. And I have no idea what verse you could possibly mean with Jesus saying He has come to abolished the mosaic law as there is no such thing. He, contrary to what you claim said that not a dot is to pass from the law.

I recommend that you read articles written on this blog as he has written extensively on this subject.
He has addressed pretty much every Pauline quote that is used against the mosaic law.
 
Last edited:
You are supposed to cast judgement when it's in righteousness, this is irrelevant as that defense can be used in regards to literally anything ("only God can judge me!"). Falling short of perfection in your case does not mean that you don't rebuke and judge others.
And the story is not even present in earlier manuscripts, neither are other passages that imply the doctrines present at the times of the copyists (my personal theory is that in this case, it'd have simply been a hassle to keep stoning whores all the time so passages were added onto the Bible).

That's why scholarly renderings of the Bible add the comment that this story is not previously present.

Along with some other changes that are not present in any other of the gospels


They did not though. Peter definitely did not say anything close to that and Paul's seemingly antinomian rhetoric does not really mean what you think it does. Modern scholarly consensus is that Paul did not intend to stop the laws regarding the feasts, unclean foods or sabbath. The gospels contain passages in support of the Torah. And I have no idea what verse you could possibly mean with Jesus saying He has come to abolished the mosaic law as there is no such thing. He, contrary to what you claim said that not a dot is to pass from the law.

I recommend that you read articles written on this blog as he has written extensively on this subject.
He has addressed pretty much every Pauline quote that is used against the mosaic law.
You realise that the mosaic law has three components. Civil, ceremonial and moral. We Christian’s follow the Moral laws but not the civil or ceremonial that’s why we don’t stone a whore for being a whore or why we don’t do circumcison.
When Jesus died he put an end to the old law for this reason once again you KNOW NOTHING about Christianity.



Also in every version (minus Chinese) including Greek Jesus never stoned the woman only a brainlet regard like you thinks this

Also the point of him saying that was to show that as we are all sinners we should be quick to cast judgement when we are eligible to be judged for our wrongdoings. He isn’t saying to ignore those that do wrong but have FUCKIN MERCY on those who acknowledge they do wrong. This is why I’m against homosexuality but I am on the side of homos who hate being gay and try their hardest to fight the urge as they hate their sin
 
Last edited:
You realise that the mosaic law has three components. Civil, ceremonial and moral. We Christian’s follow the Moral laws but not the civil or ceremonial that’s why we don’t stone a whore for being a whore or why we don’t do circumcison.
It does not, that's merely just an attempt to exclude some parts of the Torah as to fit an interpretation that is nothing close to the scriptures.
You have no guidance as to how you seperate moral/ceremonial/civil parts, this paradigm does not exist in the Bible.
When Jesus died he put an end to the old law
He did not, you don't even cite one passage to support your position.

Matthew 5:17-20:
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not one letter, not one stroke of a letter, will pass from the law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever does them and teaches them will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.

Jesus says that he did not come to abolish the law or prophets and goes on to further say that until the whole earth no longer exists then not one stroke of a letter (this includes everything, not just some part of a retarded division created as a cope) will pass away and says that "whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven".

for this reason once again you KNOW NOTHING about Christianity.
What do you think I am and what makes you think you have more knowledge than I do? As per your admission you've taken Christianity seriously for a month, for me this has been a serious belief for years. I didn't claim to be knowledgeable, I only want to expose to this idea of keeping the Torah as that is what God has intended and the Bible states this clearly.
You're of the same stock that Peter said is unwilling to learn in 2 Peter 3:16. Using Paul's and other scriptures to twist into your liking. All I want is a correct interpretation of God's word and acknowledgement that the Torah is God's law that He to this day demands to be kept.
 
Also in every version (minus Chinese) including Greek Jesus never stoned the woman only a brainlet regard like you thinks this
And to clarify, I don't believe Jesus stoned the woman in that story. I simply think the given situation never happened. Given this misunderstanding of yours it's ironic to call me a brainlet. I didn't even know Chinese texts say He did so.
 
@JohnDoe blame yourself for this now I’m going to fuck your religion the same way Mohammed fucked an 9yr old girl

"Surah 3:151: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve (all non-Muslims) …"Surah 2:191: "And kill them (non-Muslims) wherever you find them … kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers (non-Muslims).

"Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush …

“Sahih al-Bukhari 4557Narrated Abu Huraira:The Verse:--"You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind." means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
Apostasy is a Hudood crime. Execution is traditional punishment for both genders of Muslim apostates. Ja'fari – Male apostates must be executed, while a female apostate must be held in solitary confinement till she repents and returns to Islam.

Sahih al-Bukhari 6922Narrated `Ikrima:Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to `Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn `Abbas who said, "If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) forbade it, saying, 'Do not punish anybody with Allah's punishment (fire).' I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), 'Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.'"

@yeeyeeslayer @Michael Myers @SecularIslamist I’m sorry had to do this but I’m sick of the Islamic lies because without lies Islam dies @Donquixote @i_love_roosters @maou
i hate discussing religion on an incel website but before you bring up 9:5, 2:191, and 3:151, read 9:4, 9:6, and 2:190.
the reports you put arent even from a prophet theyre from regular people.
3:151 literally says its talking about hellfire.

brutal iqpill man
 
i hate discussing religion on an incel website but before you bring up 9:5, 2:191, and 3:151, read 9:4, 9:6, and 2:190.
the reports you put arent even from a prophet theyre from regular people.
3:151 literally says its talking about hellfire.

brutal iqpill man
Blud stop…


Just stop, if you’re gonna try correct me do it or don’t bother commenting. Your prophet allows for these things your God allows for these things and that’s life. And as I said go blame Johndoe the faggot for this thread he spoke about my religion so I trashed his and left it bent over in a prison toilet.
 
As you wish then
So I see the context of 9:4-6 now… and it’s still allowing the killing of the Polythiests for no other crime than they don’t worship god… this is evil even in the Old Testament this never occurred the only reason why the isrelaites killed the polytheists was because they were ruthlessly attacking and enslaving the Jews it was DEFENCIVE but this is an offensive attack against people for their beliefs… its wrong man


Sura 190-192 i support as its defensive (yes i support defensive efforts but I don’t think I used sura 190-192 tbh as that’s defensive and thefore justified)


According to sura 3:151 its about the Jews who rejected the prophethood of Mohammed hence why he made that I’ll show you link
 
Last edited:
So I see the context of 9:4-6 now… and it’s still allowing the killing of the Polythiests for no other crime than they don’t worship god… this is evil even in the Old Testament this never occurred the only reason why the isrelaites killed the polytheists was because they were ruthlessly attacking and enslaving the Jews it was DEFENCIVE but this is an offensive attack against people for their beliefs… its wrong man


Sura 190-192 i support as its defensive (yes i support defensive efforts but I don’t think I used sura 190-192 tbh as that’s defensive and thefore justified)


According to sura 3:151 its about the Jews who rejected the prophethood of Mohammed hence why he made that I’ll show you link
i mean it quite literally says "And if anyone from the polytheists asks for your protection ˹O Prophet˺, grant it to them" and

"As for the polytheists who have honored every term of their treaty with you and have not supported an enemy against you, honor your treaty with them until the end of its term"
 
i mean it quite literally says "And if anyone from the polytheists asks for your protection ˹O Prophet˺, grant it to them" and

"As for the polytheists who have honored every term of their treaty with you and have not supported an enemy against you, honor your treaty with them until the end of its term"
YES AND YET THIS IS FROM A POSTION OF OFFENCE NO DIFFERENT THAN THE MONGOLS SAYING “IF THEY SUBMIT TO US LEAVE THEM BE BUT IF THEY DONT KILL THEM ALL”

You going to say the mongols were based and justified now? As I said I agree with Sura 190 because that’s from a place of defence and rightfully SO. But the other suras are not from a place of defence. I even used the Old Testament to give an comparison and show even in there and the Israelites did some CRUEL messed up things in there every time god commanded it to be done it was in DEFENCE EVERY SINGLE TIME. This isn’t defensive in fhe case I mentioned nor is it in the 151 one even the commentary states it’s about the Jews rejecting him and mocking him.
 

Similar threads

Subhra26
Replies
31
Views
2K
TheChubbinator
TheChubbinator
i_love_roosters
Replies
27
Views
493
noobkiller999
noobkiller999
Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
18
Views
436
WeiWei
WeiWei
D
Replies
35
Views
1K
riju77
R
D
Replies
12
Views
350
riju77
R

Users who are viewing this thread

  • TheChubbinator
  • billymidnight
  • Samuel Jackson
  • delonisliterallyme
Back
Top