X
x30001
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2019
- Posts
- 3,311
- Reputation
- 4,400
If so, is it a full report of every gene? What did you learn from it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
0% curry which was all I needed to hear
Yeah me too. Just hoping they give an extensive reportWanna do it ngl
Who the fuck are those freaks holy shit
its @facemaxxedWho the fuck are those freaks holy shit
but 100% plastic0% curry which was all I needed to hear
No because race doesn’t exist or matter
Dogs were selectively bred for traitsis there a difference between a pitbull and a poodle?
same species, different race of dog.
totally different animal (despite being the same species)
race is real af and it matters stop your coping.
is there a difference between a pitbull and a poodle?
same species, different race of dog.
totally different animal (despite being the same species)
race is real af and it matters stop your coping.
shit that is brutal af100% south indian and aboriginal suck my mog cunts
Dogs were selectively bred for traits
No because race doesn’t exist or matter
Just like every sexually reproducing species. What a shock.Dogs were selectively bred for traits
Dog breeds were selectively bred so their phenotypes look very different. Humans gradually changed into different phenotypesshit that is brutal af
and humans were bred for different societies resulting in totally different races of people
some races have different bone structure and densities and even skull shapes
there are some diseases which essentially only afflict certain races (sickle cell for blacks or Tay–Sachs for jews e.g.)
Dog breeds are very phenotypically different but are less genetically different than humans. Why? Because of selective breedingJust like every sexually reproducing species. What a shock.
Dog breeds were selectively bred so their phenotypes look very different. Humans gradually changed into different phenotypes
Dog breeds are very phenotypically different but are less genetically different than humans. Why? Because of selective breeding
Youre using phenotypes to justify racism for some reasonyes, and we are different phenotypes and phenotype matters.
race is real and people are different.
we are not all 'one'
Youre using phenotypes to justify racism for some reason
Why do you feel entitled to a society that other people built? you didnt do shitthere is no master race.
blacks are stronger and faster than whites - this I will freely admit even though im white.
a black boxer against a white one the black guy will win 80% of the time.
but whites again and again have built pleasant societies to live in and have the most attractive women - we should be given credit for this and people shouldnt seek to destroy us through mass immigration and propaganda, because truly the world will lose out if they succeed.
nobody is risking their life and/or breaking immigration laws to get into somalia, yemen, china or Venezuela.
where are people trying to get into? white societies.
Why do you feel entitled to a society that other people built? you didnt do shit
Why dont societies get rid of the worthless losers who are white ( like yourself) and include the useful ethnic people who arent losers ?thats like people trying to take your inheritance you get from your parents because 'why do you feel entitled to this money you didnt earn it'
Why do societies get rid of the worthless losers who are white ( like yourself) and include the useful ethnic people who arent losers ?
Yeah it's a very good idea to send the most identifying trait of your whole existence on a sketchy company just to hope you can brag on theapricity for being 98% white if that's what will come up with the test.
Biologycel detectedpeople can get your whole DNA profile from a used starbucks cup lol, your DNA is not private unless you lock yourself in a padded room and never leave.
Biologycel detected
The amount of DNA you're sending to such companies, which is mostly from body fluids is nowhere near the same as the one of your fingerprints.
The validity of forensic fingerprint evidence has been challenged by academics, judges and the media. In the United States fingerprint examiners have not developed uniform standards for the identification of an individual based on matching fingerprints. In some countries where fingerprints are also used in criminal investigations, fingerprint examiners are required to match a number of identification points before a match is accepted. In England 16 identification points are required and in France 12, to match two fingerprints and identify an individual. Point-counting methods have been challenged by some fingerprint examiners because they focus solely on the location of particular characteristics in fingerprints that are to be matched. Fingerprint examiners may also uphold the one dissimilarity doctrine, which holds that if there is one dissimilarity between two fingerprints, the fingerprints are not from the same finger. Furthermore academics have argued that the error rate in matching fingerprints has not been adequately studied. And it has been argued that fingerprint evidence has no secure statistical foundation.[25] Research has been conducted into whether experts can objectively focus on feature information in fingerprints without being misled by extraneous information, such as context.[26]one single cell in your body, be it a skin cell or cheek cell contains your entire genome
The validity of forensic fingerprint evidence has been challenged by academics, judges and the media. In the United States fingerprint examiners have not developed uniform standards for the identification of an individual based on matching fingerprints. In some countries where fingerprints are also used in criminal investigations, fingerprint examiners are required to match a number of identification points before a match is accepted. In England 16 identification points are required and in France 12, to match two fingerprints and identify an individual. Point-counting methods have been challenged by some fingerprint examiners because they focus solely on the location of particular characteristics in fingerprints that are to be matched. Fingerprint examiners may also uphold the one dissimilarity doctrine, which holds that if there is one dissimilarity between two fingerprints, the fingerprints are not from the same finger. Furthermore academics have argued that the error rate in matching fingerprints has not been adequately studied. And it has been argued that fingerprint evidence has no secure statistical foundation.[25] Research has been conducted into whether experts can objectively focus on feature information in fingerprints without being misled by extraneous information, such as context.[26]
The cup could either contain fingerprints or an extremely small amount of saliva from your lips, which again is of negligible amount to be able to uniquely identify you.View attachment 139928
@Brandon10
people can get your whole DNA profile from a used starbucks cup lol, your DNA is not private unless you lock yourself in a padded room and never leave.
0% black is way more important.0% curry which was all I needed to hear
100% plastic tho0% curry which was all I needed to hear
If so, is it a full report of every gene? What did you learn from it?