darkness97
Solstice
- Joined
- May 20, 2020
- Posts
- 2,336
- Reputation
- 3,203
lol, this is like the third time you autistically typed "no argument". you actually have no argument. i can barely even read it. you write like you've never written or even read a scientific paper before. you write like you haven't gone further than high school.Not a single argument
Your cucked rsponse was "natural intuition leads to bias"
I told you "no, being racist and sexist is correct"
you make a point but don't explain anything or back it up with any evidence. you just type. when you're writing an essay you have you main thesis which is your main ARGUMENT and then you write supporting points. each time you make a point you support it with evidence or some sort of explanation. then you add a scientific backing to support yourself.
there is no cohesiveness or flow to what your writing which makes it come off as incoherent rambling that people cant respond to.
"High IQ people live on a higher cognitive plane, they have the means to put reality under a leash by solving engineering problems alone.
living on a higher cognitive plane doesn't actually mean anything. what is the higher cognitive plane? that in itself could be an entire essay in itself where you have to explain what you mean by that. there is no GENERAL POINT to this just random shit.
Insane pattern detection skills allow them to perceive and create new connections where there is none, as a result their lives will seldom feel devoid of meaning like the ones of your average person, who can't extrapolate nothing out of reality.
you literally typed nothing and it came from what you feel and not what you actually know. there has been no scientific method used to prove this to be true. here again you say their lives are devoid of meaning. that in itself can be an essay where that is your main argument.
intelligent people are happier than your average person. that is an argument. then you have to explain why this is true. but you don't do that you go on to the next thing.
they are directly responsible for most if not all scientific breakthroughs and quality of life improvements."
this is a redundant statement. as in its obvious and doesn't really relate to any general argument that your making.
People are actually destroying you in this thread but you're too retarded to notice that we are all telling you the same exact thing despite not even knowing what has been said. which is funny lol.
Overall there is no point or argument in this entire thread you are making. there is no general point and THIS WAS YOUR BEST most understandable section of your post.
Last edited: