Hightwolf
HTW#6700
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2020
- Posts
- 2,203
- Reputation
- 4,116
The majority of successful people throughout history were attractive, I would guess the psl of well known historical figures is on average 1 or 2 points higher than the general population. I know this is known but I just want ot give examples to make it sink in.
For the purposes of this blackpill I will use successful as meaning that the person succeeded in being influential or changing the world, whether in a positive or negative way.
Another thing is that most of these people don't necessarily look 'aesthetic' like psl aliens. They just have to have good bone structure, be tall, norwood 0, less neotonous features.
Example 1:
Top tier zygos and browridge, very wide lips, 6'4, dark thick eyebrows, norwood 2.
Another brutal example for manlets
5'9 vs 6'3
Even in the classical age it was true:
Which of these three names do most people know? The one with the most angular jaw, most prominent brow ridge, and best zygos.
Even in scientific inventions
What about artists?
Basically, if you are good looking (psl 6+) your chances of being good at what you do are higher. It is not just about being a succesful leader or politician, even in the arts and sciences good looking people are the best.
There are exceptions obviously, but they are people who succeeded despite their looks. I am also not saying that the good looking people succeeded because of their looks, but that there is a correlation.
Consider the top 100 most influential scientists of the last century, and look at how many of them were psl 6+. Compare that with how many psl 6+ people exist in a random sample of the population.
For the purposes of this blackpill I will use successful as meaning that the person succeeded in being influential or changing the world, whether in a positive or negative way.
Another thing is that most of these people don't necessarily look 'aesthetic' like psl aliens. They just have to have good bone structure, be tall, norwood 0, less neotonous features.
Example 1:
Top tier zygos and browridge, very wide lips, 6'4, dark thick eyebrows, norwood 2.
Another brutal example for manlets
5'9 vs 6'3
Even in the classical age it was true:
Which of these three names do most people know? The one with the most angular jaw, most prominent brow ridge, and best zygos.
Even in scientific inventions
What about artists?
Basically, if you are good looking (psl 6+) your chances of being good at what you do are higher. It is not just about being a succesful leader or politician, even in the arts and sciences good looking people are the best.
There are exceptions obviously, but they are people who succeeded despite their looks. I am also not saying that the good looking people succeeded because of their looks, but that there is a correlation.
Consider the top 100 most influential scientists of the last century, and look at how many of them were psl 6+. Compare that with how many psl 6+ people exist in a random sample of the population.
