Deleted member 14312
Mistral
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2021
- Posts
- 2,100
- Reputation
- 6,227
This forum has been praising the wrong people the whole time. These aesthetic looks that are seen as ideal by this forum are not nearly as good looking as classically handsome features on a man. This has became quite clear to me over time and I am surprised most people have not realized this.
There are reasons why some become famous actors and others stay as relatively low-key models. Their faces are too extreme, features are too sharp, and they are too unique and different.
On this site when we look at what makes a man attractive, we look at bones, coloring, harmony, etc. But we rarely look at facial averageness. These extremely hooded eyes and insanely protruded zygos are not aesthetic in the sense of appealing to facial averageness.
Many people on here have noticed that many women will say they prefer somewhat basic looking attractive men to these extreme models. Somehow this comes as a surprise to this forum. We need to learn that what makes a man aesthetic doesn’t make a man attractive.
If you look at all of the current top models, you will see that they have all ages tremendously in the past few years. Jordan Barrett looks like a fish, Gandy looks like a convicted offender, and Chico looks like a chronic masturbator. Clearly these aesthetic extremes are not simply retainable.
This forum needs to take a better look at what actually makes a man attractive than what makes him high in PSL ratings. I realize that many have mentioned appeal/PSL differences in the past, but we still continue to talk about these odd looking models. Take the Hollywood actor pill. They are simply more attractive and retain their good looks and healthy features much longer.
@PrestonYnot @Biiyo03 @muhammaddeen233 @volcelfatcel @StrangerDanger @one job away @astatine
There are reasons why some become famous actors and others stay as relatively low-key models. Their faces are too extreme, features are too sharp, and they are too unique and different.
On this site when we look at what makes a man attractive, we look at bones, coloring, harmony, etc. But we rarely look at facial averageness. These extremely hooded eyes and insanely protruded zygos are not aesthetic in the sense of appealing to facial averageness.
Many people on here have noticed that many women will say they prefer somewhat basic looking attractive men to these extreme models. Somehow this comes as a surprise to this forum. We need to learn that what makes a man aesthetic doesn’t make a man attractive.
If you look at all of the current top models, you will see that they have all ages tremendously in the past few years. Jordan Barrett looks like a fish, Gandy looks like a convicted offender, and Chico looks like a chronic masturbator. Clearly these aesthetic extremes are not simply retainable.
This forum needs to take a better look at what actually makes a man attractive than what makes him high in PSL ratings. I realize that many have mentioned appeal/PSL differences in the past, but we still continue to talk about these odd looking models. Take the Hollywood actor pill. They are simply more attractive and retain their good looks and healthy features much longer.
@PrestonYnot @Biiyo03 @muhammaddeen233 @volcelfatcel @StrangerDanger @one job away @astatine
