Homophobes are simps for women

[Deleted member 23391]

Most straight men seem programmed on a deep biological level to be expendable, fungible worker drones for foids, even taking pleasure in their slavery, who become hostile at men that even think about breaking apart from that group. Notice they always loudly proclaim that gay or bi men aren't "real men" and aren't fulfilling their duties as though all men (besides Chad of course) must be selfless slaves for foids. Look at their arguments, it always has to do with the fact that homosexuals aren't adequately serving women enough.

Sure, there are other arguments. The tradcuck homophobes also cite homosexuality not being procreative and say that homosexuals should reproduce instead. But this makes no sense and is obviously in bad faith, as they don't even want gays to be around children whatsoever because they think homosexuals are all pedophile child rapists who will will have an insatiable urge to molest and rape the child because supposedly this is "how homosexuals reproduce".

@Lord-Arthur_17 @Eriot Lodger

 

[Latinus]

High IQ thread.

 

[horizontallytall]

This is just evolution ,nothing can be done. U will lose sanity if u keep seeking logic and denying ur basic instincts. Only creates problems for oneself

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Most straight men seem programmed on a deep biological level to be expendable, fungible worker drones for foids, even taking pleasure in their slavery, who become hostile at men that even think about breaking apart from that group. Notice they always loudly proclaim that gay or bi men aren't "real men" and aren't fulfilling their duties as though all men (besides Chad of course) must be selfless slaves for foids. Look at their arguments, it always has to do with the fact that homosexuals aren't adequately serving women enough.

Sure, there are other arguments. The tradcuck homophobes also cite homosexuality not being procreative and say that homosexuals should reproduce instead. But this makes no sense and is obviously in bad faith, as they don't even want gays to be around children whatsoever because they think homosexuals are all pedophile child rapists who will will have an insatiable urge to molest and rape the child because supposedly this is "how homosexuals reproduce".

@Lord-Arthur_17 @Eriot Lodger

Why is this forum so homophobic​

Jealousy. A lot of people here can't lead a hedonistic lifestyle, so they keep telling themselves this is wrong. They feel furious that someone has such easy access to sex and doesn't have to deal with women.

Ignorance. There are also those here who are brainwashed by right-wing politicians. They do not base their views on facts, but on opinions resulting from religious beliefs and prejudices arising from fake news.

It can be seen as a natural result of capitalism's systemic inefficiencies. When capitalism fails, a scapegoat is needed, and often a poorly assimilated minority is blamed. This creates a narrative that deflects blame from capitalists and onto a certain minority group, often linking them to left-wing movements. These narratives allow capitalists to avoid criticism and put the blame on others.​

 

[Deleted member 21345]

I am gay and I dont see how this adds up, gay men are probably bigger simps than the avg straight guy. Although I'd say gay men tend to critique women's looks harshly most of them are pretty much "simps" for the most part

 

[Deleted member 2832]

Lgbtq+ "people" and the feminazi tribe are joining forces against normal men
Couldn't care less

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Lgbtq+ "people" and the feminazi tribe are joining forces against normal men
Couldn't care less

The right wing forced them into an alliance with feminists. It's hard to support someone who spits on you...​

 

[Gus17]

Most straight men seem programmed on a deep biological level to be expendable, fungible worker drones for foids, even taking pleasure in their slavery, who become hostile at men that even think about breaking apart from that group. Notice they always loudly proclaim that gay or bi men aren't "real men" and aren't fulfilling their duties as though all men (besides Chad of course) must be selfless slaves for foids. Look at their arguments, it always has to do with the fact that homosexuals aren't adequately serving women enough.

Sure, there are other arguments. The tradcuck homophobes also cite homosexuality not being procreative and say that homosexuals should reproduce instead. But this makes no sense and is obviously in bad faith, as they don't even want gays to be around children whatsoever because they think homosexuals are all pedophile child rapists who will will have an insatiable urge to molest and rape the child because supposedly this is "how homosexuals reproduce".

@Lord-Arthur_17 @Eriot Lodger

Gay men are just gross weirdos who participate in butt sex. Evolutionary they aren’t motivated to get women so won’t sacrifice for the tribe and act extremely feminine so they’re useless.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Gay men are just gross weirdos who participate in butt sex.

And heterosexual people don't have anal sex?
​

Evolutionary they aren’t motivated to get women so won’t sacrifice for the tribe

I would like to remind you that the times of the Stone Age are long gone. Nowadays you have a lot of orphanages and somehow I don't see that pro-life activists willingly took the lead in adoptions.
​

and act extremely feminine so they’re useless.

Stereotype.​

 

[Napoleon de Geso]

Homophobes, agecucks, and all kinds of closeted white knights lurking this place

 

[Gus17]

And heterosexual people don't have anal sex?​

They do and it’s gross but not as gross as when men do it because we evolved to see hetro sex as normal and the idea of sleeping with another men repulsive. Biogically we want to be around those who share similar values and somone fucking another dudes naturally disgusts us.

I would like to remind you that the times of the Stone Age are long gone.​

Doesn’t matter if the Stone Age is gone we evolved to live in it. Are biogical instincts which lead to a natural disgust for gays are based upon what was best for living in a hunter gather life style.

Nowadays you have a lot of orphanages and somehow I don't see that pro-life activists willingly took the lead in adoptions.​

First of all pro-life has nothing to do with adoptions it’s a safe sex issue. If dengen leftists practiced safe sex where you use a condom and we’re on the pill the chance of actually getting pregnant is so minuscule that it would eliminate 99.99% of abortion cases.

Stereotype.​

No all gay men I know are useless faggots. Probably because hetro sex is the main motivator for men. Their feminine weak behavior is annoying especially how they act like women.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

They do and it’s gross but not as gross as when men do it because we evolved to see hetro sex as normal and the idea of sleeping with another men repulsive. Biogically we want to be around those who share similar values and somone fucking another dudes naturally disgusts us.

Doesn’t matter if the Stone Age is gone we evolved to live in it. Are biogical instincts which lead to a natural disgust for gays are based upon what was best for living in a hunter gather life style.

The naturalistic fallacy is the idea that what is found in nature is good. It was the basis for social Darwinism, the belief that helping the poor and sick would get in the way of evolution, which depends on the survival of the fittest.

We can come to the conclusion that incels are also useless - including you
​

First of all pro-life has nothing to do with adoptions it’s a safe sex issue. If dengen leftists practiced safe sex where you use a condom and we’re on the pill the chance of actually getting pregnant is so minuscule that it would eliminate 99.99% of abortion cases.

Do you know who bans contraception? Religions, right-wing parties.​

 

[ranierean]

It can be seen as a natural result of capitalism's systemic inefficiencies. When capitalism fails, a scapegoat is needed, and often a poorly assimilated minority is blamed. This creates a narrative that deflects blame from capitalists and onto a certain minority group, often linking them to left-wing movements. These narratives allow capitalists to avoid criticism and put the blame on others.

Poorly assimilated? Retard, they're janissaries for the regime, they're a privileged class above straight people, every major transnational corporation loves them and expresses fealty to them, often going against their own profit incentives.

It's hard to support someone who spits on you...

Recognizing mutual benefit doesn't need require displaying outward mutual friendliness.
Shitlibs love nogs like their pets but it's not like you won't be stabbed by them in Brooklyn if you go there and say "I love congoids" like you seem to be doing.

And heterosexual people don't have anal sex?

Below-80-IQ soylib baby's first gay debate talking point.
Straights delving more and more into anal play is the direct result of gay acceptance btw.

I would like to remind you that the times of the Stone Age are long gone.

The regression to the mean of humanity by the means of placating fags and niggers is precisely the desire to go back to the communitarian forms of living of the past.
If you want to see a high-tech space-forward future you should be supporting eugenics, meritocracy and TND (which all are market-based principles btw).

I am gay and I dont see how this adds up, gay men are probably bigger simps than the avg straight guy. Although I'd say gay men tend to critique women's looks harshly most of them are pretty much "simps" for the most part

I've noticed this too. The default for modern gays seems to be presenting female-safe masculinity or rejecting masculinity outright--women wouldn't love them if that wasn't the case.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Poorly assimilated? Retard, they're janissaries for the regime, they're a privileged class above straight people, every major transnational corporation loves them and expresses fealty to them, often going against their own profit incentives.

Corporations do it for profit, not because they love them. These companies often support anti-gay politicians for tax cuts or do business with countries where being gay is punishable by death.
​

The regression to the mean of humanity by the means of placating fags and niggers is precisely the desire to go back to the communitarian forms of living of the past.
If you want to see a high-tech space-forward future you should be supporting eugenics, meritocracy and TND (which all are market-based principles btw).

On eugenics

Stopping genetic diseases is practically impossible because heterozygotes predominate in the population and transmit one recessive gene (responsible for genetic diseases) and they cannot be detected until a homozygote (two recessive genes) is created, i.e. a person with a genetic disease. So if you forbid genetically ill people from reproducing, you won't stop genetic diseases anyway.

Even if you manage to detect and stop it - there is such a thing as balanced polymorphism. This means that every few generations they recreate the recessive genes responsible for genetic diseases

And apart from genetic diseases, you will not create an army of perfect people by manipulating genes, because the most outstanding individuals with unique skills are created as a result of mixing genes. By limiting this, you will limit the birth of people with a high IQ, etc.

More on why meritocracy is a myth of capitalism: https://looksmax.org/threads/the-femboy-manifesto.664056/post-10836957​

 

[Deleted member 21345]

Poorly assimilated? Retard, they're janissaries for the regime, they're a privileged class above straight people, every major transnational corporation loves them and expresses fealty to them, often going against their own profit incentives.

Recognizing mutual benefit doesn't need require displaying outward mutual friendliness.
Shitlibs love nogs like their pets but it's not like you won't be stabbed by them in Brooklyn if you go there and say "I love congoids" like you seem to be doing.

Below-80-IQ soylib baby's first gay debate talking point.
Straights delving more and more into anal play is the direct result of gay acceptance btw.

The regression to the mean of humanity by the means of placating fags and niggers is precisely the desire to go back to the communitarian forms of living of the past.
If you want to see a high-tech space-forward future you should be supporting eugenics, meritocracy and TND (which all are market-based principles btw).

I've noticed this too. The default for modern gays seems to be presenting female-safe masculinity or rejecting masculinity outright--women wouldn't love them if that wasn't the case.

Based on the syntax it sounds like you post on amarna forums or BAPsphere Twitter. How accurate am I

 

[Patient A]

Poorly assimilated? Retard, they're janissaries for the regime, they're a privileged class above straight people, every major transnational corporation loves them and expresses fealty to them, often going against their own profit incentives.

Recognizing mutual benefit doesn't need require displaying outward mutual friendliness.
Shitlibs love nogs like their pets but it's not like you won't be stabbed by them in Brooklyn if you go there and say "I love congoids" like you seem to be doing.

Below-80-IQ soylib baby's first gay debate talking point.
Straights delving more and more into anal play is the direct result of gay acceptance btw.

The regression to the mean of humanity by the means of placating fags and niggers is precisely the desire to go back to the communitarian forms of living of the past.
If you want to see a high-tech space-forward future you should be supporting eugenics, meritocracy and TND (which all are market-based principles btw).

I've noticed this too. The default for modern gays seems to be presenting female-safe masculinity or rejecting masculinity outright--women wouldn't love them if that wasn't the case.

This guy took the Longhouse pill