how can i learn to objectively rate?

maxlooksmax

maxlooksmax

to be seen
Joined
Oct 31, 2024
Posts
5,014
Reputation
5,503
i want to learn to do facial analysis
give harmony scores dimorphism angularity and misc etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: flatcheck213 and sigmamogger
@anthony111553 will guide you
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Evgeniy291, ltn gooner, kyphoscoliosis and 3 others

Attachments

  • 4751403_4734418_1740299803211.png
    4751403_4734418_1740299803211.png
    681.9 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: kyphoscoliosis and sigmamogger
  • +1
Reactions: ltn gooner and schniedelverspeiser
Ratios
Dimorphism
Angularity
Coloring
Health Indicators
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Ratios
Dimorphism
Angularity
Coloring
Health Indicators
Am I getting this right regarding the ideal for each category

Ratios: don’t know enough about
Dimorphism: enough to not look like a pre-pubescent child, not too much where you look ogre
Angularity: having sharp bone definition, not being recessed or bloated
Coloring: a point of contention on this site, some say a healthy tan is ideal. Others say pale porcelain skin
Health indicators: good collagen, not being a fat fuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: Futura and maxlooksmax
Tag me when you learn or where you find a full guide about it
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Tag me when you learn or where you find a full guide about it
Problem is it actually IS subjective which is why there isn’t a definite scale

But if you really wanted to make an accurate scale you would probably have to use AI to analyse the average ratios features and colouring of widely agreed handsome people throughout different ages

And get AI to analyse like 100,000 faces and find how rare it is to be a certain rating - idk basically it’s difficult bu most of the time there is an agrrrablr rating for wtv reason
 
  • +1
Reactions: Futura and averagenormie
Problem is it actually IS subjective which is why there isn’t a definite scale

But if you really wanted to make an accurate scale you would probably have to use AI to analyse the average ratios features and colouring of widely agreed handsome people throughout different ages

And get AI to analyse like 100,000 faces and find how rare it is to be a certain rating - idk basically it’s difficult bu most of the time there is an agrrrablr rating for wtv reason
Based on Eurocentric standards do objective analysis, subjective opinion is valid but not to be taken seriously
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Am I getting this right regarding the ideal for each category

Ratios: don’t know enough about
Dimorphism: enough to not look like a pre-pubescent child, not too much where you look ogre
Angularity: having sharp bone definition, not being recessed or bloated
Coloring: a point of contention on this site, some say a healthy tan is ideal. Others say pale porcelain skin
Health indicators: good collagen, not being a fat fuck
High dimorphism is ideal, ogre = bad harmony/coloring/bald but yeah
 

Similar threads

maxlooksmax
Replies
44
Views
636
solodolo
S
maxlooksmax
Replies
12
Views
200
heightmaxxing
heightmaxxing
N
Replies
1
Views
82
rrm_ss2
rrm_ss2
pinterest
Replies
17
Views
229
smartstyle
smartstyle
S
Replies
28
Views
931
Joaquin
Joaquin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top