how can i learn to objectively rate?

[schizowillascend]

i want to learn to do facial analysis
give harmony scores dimorphism angularity and misc etc

 

[sigmamogger]

@anthony111553 will guide you

 

[brain]

log off

 

[brownmutt42]

Didn’t you leave?

 

[Pencil]

@anthony111553 will guide you

 

[schizowillascend]

Didn’t you leave?

Yes just wanted to ask this

 

[ltnjasper08]

i want to learn to do facial analysis
give harmony scores dimorphism angularity and misc etc

there already is a guide somewhere

 

[brownmutt42]

Yes just wanted to ask this

Go look at users who are good at rating

 

[Futura]

Ratios
Dimorphism
Angularity
Coloring
Health Indicators

 

[kyphoscoliosis]

Ratios
Dimorphism
Angularity
Coloring
Health Indicators

Am I getting this right regarding the ideal for each category

Ratios: don’t know enough about
Dimorphism: enough to not look like a pre-pubescent child, not too much where you look ogre
Angularity: having sharp bone definition, not being recessed or bloated
Coloring: a point of contention on this site, some say a healthy tan is ideal. Others say pale porcelain skin
Health indicators: good collagen, not being a fat fuck

 

[averagenormie]

Tag me when you learn or where you find a full guide about it

 

[schizowillascend]

Tag me when you learn or where you find a full guide about it

Problem is it actually IS subjective which is why there isn’t a definite scale

But if you really wanted to make an accurate scale you would probably have to use AI to analyse the average ratios features and colouring of widely agreed handsome people throughout different ages

And get AI to analyse like 100,000 faces and find how rare it is to be a certain rating - idk basically it’s difficult bu most of the time there is an agrrrablr rating for wtv reason

 

[averagenormie]

Problem is it actually IS subjective which is why there isn’t a definite scale

But if you really wanted to make an accurate scale you would probably have to use AI to analyse the average ratios features and colouring of widely agreed handsome people throughout different ages

And get AI to analyse like 100,000 faces and find how rare it is to be a certain rating - idk basically it’s difficult bu most of the time there is an agrrrablr rating for wtv reason

Based on Eurocentric standards do objective analysis, subjective opinion is valid but not to be taken seriously

 

[Futura]

Am I getting this right regarding the ideal for each category

Ratios: don’t know enough about
Dimorphism: enough to not look like a pre-pubescent child, not too much where you look ogre
Angularity: having sharp bone definition, not being recessed or bloated
Coloring: a point of contention on this site, some say a healthy tan is ideal. Others say pale porcelain skin
Health indicators: good collagen, not being a fat fuck

High dimorphism is ideal, ogre = bad harmony/coloring/bald but yeah