how did east asians go from fierce warriors/rapists/sadistic high T killers to weak soyboys with the bodies of 12 year old boys in their 40's?

[TheLightOfMyLife]

Mongol are NOT chinks bro. They are built different

 

[GrowthReaper]

flat faces, wide noses, swarthy skin, straight jet black hair is adaptive to arctic climates. at some point. mongols/east asians were the same/very similar people. plus mongols graped their way through east asia. so most east asian males would have a mongolian y chromosome however are still beta despite this.

Mongols were outnumbered 100:1 in China. Even during Yuan dynasty, which barely lasted one lifetime, there wasn't enough mixing to be relevant, apart from Manchuria and . However, there was some mixing in pre-history and it operates under a North-South gradient in China (Xiongnu, Jurchen etc... being more Altaic/Turkic)

Also, during the last Ice Age, East Eurasians lived essentially in the same climate as the current Siberians. This might explain their concurrent development of arctic traits.

Chinese and Koreans are just farmers, that's why they're so weak.

 

[banjojones]

Khan was a green-eyed ginger. Khan would be ashamed of that specimen. @666PSL

don'tcha know! we wuz white kangz n' sheit! Martin Luther King Junior was secretly white as well but those darn afrocentrists try to blackwash history!

 

[banjojones]

Show depictions of him being ginger.

don'tcha know! we wuz white kangz n' sheit! Martin Luther King Junior was secretly white as well but those darn afrocentrists try to blackwash history!

 

[banjojones]

Khan was a green-eyed ginger. Khan would be ashamed of that specimen. @666PSL

uh a ginger would BURN to death of skin cancer in 5 minutes on the treeless sunny steppes of asia

 

[banjojones]

What youre not understand is that mongols were paternally partially Indoeuropean by the time they started conquering. They got buck broken first by Iranian scythian nomads, learned nomadism and horse culture from them, thats what made them somewhat stronger than other asians. The average mongol or central asian today though is built like a twink. They rarely look like what youd imagine. They are also malnourished and short compared to caucasoids

how come mongolia has the highest testosterone levels in the world? I doubt a twink could conquer from poland to korea. plus look at the "full blooded" asiatics in the Japanese Imperial army. I don't know what happened but Japan went from beating russia/conquering china/fighting against america, having a huge empire in the phillippines/pacific to becoming anime body-pillow loversMaybe its the radiation from the nukes but i don't know what the deal is!

 

[banjojones]

These are the remnant of mongols in afghanistan and lesser extent refugees in Iran and pakistan: hazaras. And they continuously get physically bullied in one on one confrontations. Everyone just shits on them, fucks their woman etc.. pashtuns genocided like 80% lf them not too long ago. Mongols were bery tough when it came to slaugthering innocents, later on when they werent on top they got buck broken hard.
View attachment 3645075

true. how do you think the buckbreaking started? Its not just mongolian descendants. but east asians in general. they used to be tough like the japanese but then became anime body pillow lovers

 

[banjojones]

Mongol are NOT chinks bro. They are built different

how? mongols look like chinks on steroids. chinks/mongols both have flat noses, swarthy skin, jet black hair, and slanted eyes. they seem pretty similar to me

 

[banjojones]

Mongols were outnumbered 100:1 in China. Even during Yuan dynasty, which barely lasted one lifetime, there wasn't enough mixing to be relevant, apart from Manchuria and . However, there was some mixing in pre-history and it operates under a North-South gradient in China (Xiongnu, Jurchen etc... being more Altaic/Turkic)

Also, during the last Ice Age, East Eurasians lived essentially in the same climate as the current Siberians. This might explain their concurrent development of arctic traits.

Chinese and Koreans are just farmers, that's why they're so weak.

what about mongolian rape babies in korea. wouldn't they be high T? Plus how did japs go from ruthless samurais who would kill themselves if they lost a battle to anime body pillow lovers

 

[banjojones]

Japan and Korea are American vassal states that’s why. China is on the rise and is the other superpower of the world

so is america poisoning them with soy/breeding men to be small/weak?

 

[Manchild_v2]

Put Koreans in a genetic calculator with the japanese and they are as close as Spaniards and the Portugese. Koreans have all these elements as well just in a slightly different permutation

 

[got.daim]

east Asians have never had high t, it has always been the mongols

 

[lastofus123]

They didn't rape anyone in Russia jfl at this history cope

The Russians were beating them in close combat, only way Mongols won was by luting them to plain lands otherwise we were winning in close combat

 

[bakpaokukus]

only high t asians are mongolians everyone else is cucked tbh

Pacific islanders too if you considered all Austronesians as Asians

 

[GrowthReaper]

what about mongolian rape babies in korea. wouldn't they be high T? Plus how did japs go from ruthless samurais who would kill themselves if they lost a battle to anime body pillow lovers

Toughness and High T are not genetic, they're cultural. Rural barbarian societies like the Mongols have extremely High T and a warrior culture. Mongolians today are soft wimps regardless, apart from some rural populations and horse riders in Central Asia.

The East Asians simply have been soft (urban farmers) for millennia, which just makes them more low T and weak than the modern Mongolians, whose fall was more recent. Nowadays most peoples are soft and urban anyway, not just East Asians.

 

[LegendaryKennen]

rice and noodles

 

[banjojones]

Toughness and High T are not genetic, they're cultural. Rural barbarian societies like the Mongols have extremely High T and a warrior culture. Mongolians today are soft wimps regardless, apart from some rural populations and horse riders in Central Asia.

The East Asians simply have been soft (urban farmers) for millennia, which just makes them more low T and weak than the modern Mongolians, whose fall was more recent. Nowadays most peoples are soft and urban anyway, not just East Asians.

how come niggers are urban but very dangerous/and very high T? heck they literally used to be used on farms.

 

[banjojones]

Put Koreans in a genetic calculator with the japanese and they are as close as Spaniards and the Portugese. Koreans have all these elements as well just in a slightly different permutation

still how come old japanese were high T/sadists such as the Japanese Imperial army in WWII. how did they go from dismembering U.S Marines, doing Bonzai Charges. To body pillow lovers?

-I don't care if they lost WWII it takes BALLS to jump in a moving tank/strangle some drunken Russian T-34 operator to death


(plus the only reason they "lost" was because the U.S.A nuked them due to these Japanese people NOT GIVING UP! They would just GO AT IT even if they lost the battle! (sounds GIGA HIGH T to me!)

 

[GrowthReaper]

how come niggers are urban but very dangerous/and very high T? heck they literally used to be used on farms.

Niggers are extremely poor in a high stress dangerous environment. They're also impulsive and low IQ.

 

[Lord Shadow]

Those kpop stars facially mog almost everyone on this forum and age like honey to the point where they can get millions of prime JBs thirsting for them in there 40s, the only people who say this type of stuff is men lol its funny I'd rather be the kpop twink tho

 

[sigma boii]

Rice

 

[ShowerCelling]

Mongol are NOT chinks bro. They are built different

chinks but higher t

 

[DarkTriadBeliever]

There's no drastic difference in any races looks besides living an easy life

inb4 some idiot says they only eat raw meat back then

 

[banjojones]

Niggers are extremely poor in a high stress dangerous environment. They're also impulsive and low IQ.

Yes we all know niggers are dum dums does not take a fucking rocket scientist to figure that out. But that still didnt answer the question. Group A. Is agrarian and urban and all the men look like 12 year old boys. Group B is urban and agrarian as well however all the men look like hercules.

-why?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

The same way Africans and Slavs went from soft bitch bitch boy faggors being bullied and enslaved by everybody to being the terrors of the modern age

Whites did the same thing Asians did from big boy chads to modern day faggots

I don't believe for one minute when loser white incels who just want to racemix with easy asian prostitutes say that east asian men are "more evolved" or "naturally low T" or "have a slow life strategy" look at Ghengis Khan or the Japanese imperial army. They slaughtered/raped asian and white peasants (the mongols did a ton of rape especially in russia/ukraine) and the Mongols had the biggest land empire on the planet, controlled trade, and spices. Also I highly doubt a guy like Ghengis Khan or a soldier in the Japanese Imperial Army who SACKED Nanking had the body of an 12 year old boy that modern asians do today.

-What happened?

Its sad. That some K-pop twink is a (literal) descendant of Ghengis Khan. Its almost like rice became victims of their own success?

Is it un ironically oofy doofy theory? Ie asian women DELIBERATELY SELECT for beta traits and (un-ironically leave the changs to dry)? Like maybe due to brutality asians got SO SUCCESSFUL that they ended up not needing to be high T? (like High T people come from harsh environments but when you win a ton of wars/make a thriving civilization your T drops? or women even select weak beta providers over high T men one a high T culture wins wars/creates civilization?)

-discuss

 

[GrowthReaper]

Yes we all know niggers are dum dums does not take a fucking rocket scientist to figure that out. But that still didnt answer the question. Group A. Is agrarian and urban and all the men look like 12 year old boys. Group B is urban and agrarian as well however all the men look like hercules.

-why?

Because these changes take hundreds if not thousands of years to take shape. East Asians have been farmers since at least 6000 BC, and urban since 1500 BC. Africans were airdropped straight from tribal hunter-gatherer life into the urban system of Europeans, but even then they didn't partake in the abundance of our society, as they were literally slaves doing manual labor.

150 years ago they became normal citizens for the first time, and yet still did not participate in the excesses. They were and still are poor due to multiple genetic factors. Not only that, but their culture is still primal, even in an urban system. They murder each other and have multiple children. The most aggressive and violent men are filtered for reproduction, as they will be the only ones to prosper in this environment.

 

[banjojones]

Because these changes take hundreds if not thousands of years to take shape. East Asians have been farmers since at least 6000 BC, and urban since 1500 BC. Africans were airdropped straight from tribal hunter-gatherer life into the urban system of Europeans, but even then they didn't partake in the abundance of our society, as they were literally slaves doing manual labor.

150 years ago they became normal citizens for the first time, and yet still did not participate in the excesses. They were and still are poor due to multiple genetic factors. Not only that, but their culture is still primal, even in an urban system. They murder each other and have multiple children. The most aggressive and violent men are filtered for reproduction, as they will be the only ones to prosper in this environment.

West africans were agrarian in africa despite being primative (that is one reason they were used for slaves their bodies were strong enough to farm in the hot humid climate in the southern u.s.a without getting malaria/yellow fever. Parts of the southern u.s.a were sub-tropical). West Africans cultivated rice and down south their descendants cultivate rice today etc. many southern foods in the u.s.a are rice based like Gumbo, Jumbalaya, cajun dirty rice, Alabama Red Beans n' Rice etc. Granted they were not urban but west africans were in fairness NOT spearing zebras (you are thinking of Massai/Koi San who spear zebras) but cultivating (rather primatively) rice, yam, peanuts, melons, okra, and black eyed peas back in west africa etc.

Odd how one agrarian population is twinkish while another agrarian population looked roided up etc

-why?

 

[GrowthReaper]

West africans were agrarian (that is one reason they were used for slaves). West Africans cultivated rice and down south their descendants cultivate rice etc. many southern foods in the u.s.a are rice based like Gumbo, Jumbalaya, cajun dirty rice, Alabama Red Beans n' Rice etc. Granted they were not urban but west africans were in fairness NOT spearing zebras but cultivating (rather primatively) rice, yam, okra, and black eyed peas back in africa etc.

Odd how one agrarian population is twinkish while another agrarian population looked roided up etc

-why?

The population that fell to slavery and were traded to the Europeans usually came from small villages, which in West Africa at the time (15th and 16th Centuries) had only seen agriculture for 1500 years, without even fully embracing it. They still had strong elements of hunting and pastoralism, unlike the fully agrarian East Asians and Neolithic Europeans.

Africa also has a much richer variety of animals and fruits which meant the physical degradation never happened to them in the same degree as it did to the malnourished NAF and East Asians who relied almost solely on wheat and rice, respectively.

East Asians also hadn't seen a warlike culture ever in their history. China (and by consequence Korea and Japan, save for military elites which comprised a small percentage) had always been bureaucratic and urban. The filter for reproductive success was intelligence and work ethic (imperial exam defining your life since before Christ), unlike even the Europeans. The Africans even now filter for strength.

 

[banjojones]

The population that fell to slavery and were traded to the Europeans usually came from small villages, which in West Africa at the time (15th and 16th Centuries) had only seen agriculture for 1500 years, without even fully embracing it. They still had strong elements of hunting and pastoralism, unlike the fully agrarian East Asians and Neolithic Europeans.

Africa also has a much richer variety of animals and fruits which meant the physical degradation never happened to them in the same degree as it did to the malnourished NAF and East Asians who relied almost solely on wheat and rice, respectively.

East Asians also hadn't seen a warlike culture ever in their history. China (and by consequence Korea and Japan, save for military elites which comprised a small percentage) had always been bureaucratic and urban. The filter for reproductive success was intelligence and work ethic (imperial exam defining your life since before Christ), unlike even the Europeans. The Africans even now filter for strength.

if west africans were hunters. why did slaves bring a lot of rice/okra based dishes in southern u.s cuisine? rice/okra is indigenous to west africa. jollof rice and okra in west african cuisine is VERY similar to gumbo/jumbalaya in the deep south in the u.s.a. Sure nigger tribes are morons (even the agricultural tribes) however planting seeds is a pretty low iq relatively low strength activity. when you were in kindergarden didn't they have you plant seeds? it was REALLY fucking easy.

it is even easier/low iq to farm in a tropical climate etc the only reason farming is "hard" is if you farm in a cold climate. But in a hot year round climate farming is RETARDEDLY easy etc. So why would nature select niggers who are low iq and pretty lazy to be strong? Hunting is a HIGH ENERGY activity especially in a tropical climate. Just digging a ditch, throwing some okra seeds, and growing a crop of rice year round seems much easier in that environment.

(I would actually argue europeans became successful NOT via agriculture but via our paleolithic hunting ancestors. Even "hunting" tribes in africa just scavenge or hunt slow animals like eggs, grubs, small fish etc) point is niggers are REALLY fucking lazy I just don't see them going on a high energy/hunt that requires lots of planning

 

[banjojones]

The population that fell to slavery and were traded to the Europeans usually came from small villages, which in West Africa at the time (15th and 16th Centuries) had only seen agriculture for 1500 years, without even fully embracing it. They still had strong elements of hunting and pastoralism, unlike the fully agrarian East Asians and Neolithic Europeans.

Africa also has a much richer variety of animals and fruits which meant the physical degradation never happened to them in the same degree as it did to the malnourished NAF and East Asians who relied almost solely on wheat and rice, respectively.

East Asians also hadn't seen a warlike culture ever in their history. China (and by consequence Korea and Japan, save for military elites which comprised a small percentage) had always been bureaucratic and urban. The filter for reproductive success was intelligence and work ethic (imperial exam defining your life since before Christ), unlike even the Europeans. The Africans even now filter for strength.

sure but east asians and mongolians as well are descended from siberians. flat wide noses, dark skin, jet black hair are all arctic/asiatic traits. Plus wouldn't east asian Y chromosome change via grape? Ghengis Khan graped a lot of china. wouldn't han chinese women breed with/(be graped) by Mongolian warrior men and then the weak farmer males would die off? plus keep in mind much of china/korea is FREEZING cold (can get cold as moscow) only southern china/okinawa gets tolerable. So why would an arctic adapted people in a relatively cold country go out of their way to cultivate a mal-adapted sub-tropical crop (rice) when they could farm cattle/sheep/goats instead? Eskimos (racially asians) don't consume rice rather they eat a higher meat diet. (more adaptable)

-part of me thinks oofy doofy theory is law in china (oofy doofy theory is where women DELIBERATELY breed with beta males in order to maintain control in the relationship etc) while in west africa black women i guess like a more masculine aesthetic so select based on raw size/strength (thus polygamy being more common in west africa. tyrones are rather rare and not enough to go around so all the women in the village gather around and fuck that 1 tyrone etc)

 

[GrowthReaper]

if west africans were hunters. why did slaves bring a lot of rice/okra based dishes in southern u.s cuisine? rice/okra is indigenous to west africa. jollof rice and okra in west african cuisine is VERY similar to gumbo/jumbalaya in the deep south in the u.s.a. Sure nigger tribes are morons (even the agricultural tribes) however planting seeds is a pretty low iq relatively low strength activity. when you were in kindergarden didn't they have you plant seeds? it was REALLY fucking easy.

it is even easier/low iq to farm in a tropical climate etc the only reason farming is "hard" is if you farm in a cold climate. But in a hot year round climate farming is RETARDEDLY easy etc. So why would nature select niggers who are low iq and pretty lazy to be strong? Hunting is a HIGH ENERGY activity especially in a tropical climate. Just digging a ditch, throwing some okra seeds, and growing a crop of rice year round seems much easier in that environment.

(I would actually argue europeans became successful NOT via agriculture but via our paleolithic hunting ancestors. Even "hunting" tribes in africa just scavenge or hunt slow animals like eggs, grubs, small fish etc) point is niggers are REALLY fucking lazy I just don't see them going on a high energy/hunt that requires lots of planning

That's not what I said. They were farmers, yes, but only partially. They still retained most of the hunting and pastoral traditions. Not only that, but unlike the 10,000 year period of European/East Asian physical degradation, the Africans only had 1500 years to experience it.

The Neolithic Anatolian Farmers (occupants of Europe for most of the Agricultural Revolution) were not the reason for Europe's success, much the contrary. They were conquered and either raped or outright exterminated by the Aryan Pastorals, depending on the region. Some Hunter-Gatherer groups survived in modern European genetics but only around 5-10% in some specific populations, the rest comes from the Aryan conquerors, especially Y-Chromosomes. The haplo-groups R1b and R1a dominate, and are the actual Caucasian genome.

Also, you underestimate just how undeveloped West Africa was. You're using slave dishes from 19th Century America as proof for their agricultural tradition but if you go to West Africa today they have a diet worthy of being thrown in the garbage. It's just grain mush with whatever disgusting meat they find.

 

[GrowthReaper]

sure but east asians and mongolians as well are descended from siberians. flat wide noses, dark skin, jet black hair are all arctic/asiatic traits. Plus wouldn't east asian Y chromosome change via grape? Ghengis Khan graped a lot of china. wouldn't han chinese women breed with/(be graped) by Mongolian warrior men and then the weak farmer males would die off? plus keep in mind much of china/korea is FREEZING cold (can get cold as moscow) only southern china/okinawa gets tolerable. So why would an arctic adapted people in a relatively cold country go out of their way to cultivate a mal-adapted sub-tropical crop (rice) when they could farm cattle/sheep/goats instead? Eskimos (racially asians) don't consume rice rather they eat a higher meat diet. (more adaptable)

-part of me thinks oofy doofy theory is law in china (oofy doofy theory is where women DELIBERATELY breed with beta males in order to maintain control in the relationship etc) while in west africa black women i guess like a more masculine aesthetic so select based on raw size/strength (thus polygamy being more common in west africa. tyrones are rather rare and not enough to go around so all the women in the village gather around and fuck that 1 tyrone etc)

First of all, saying 'grape' is cringe as fuck.

Like I said before, the Mongols were not demographically significant in China as a whole. They had an impact on Northern Han genetics, especially Manchuria and the Hebei area, but not much else. Again, they were outnumbered 100:1 by the Han and the Yuan dynasty only lasted for 80 years.

Also, China is not in fact freezing cold. Beijing is equivalent in latitude to Madrid, while regions in the center are already equivalent to Texas or Crete. I'm not saying they will be inherently equal in weather but saying China is an arctic climate is ridiculous.

And like I said, China already had a culture of intelligence being the main reproductive selector since before the birth of Christ. The Imperial Exam was a national tradition and defined your entire life. Just like today.