How do ratings work?

[jien]

A lot of people on this site seem to just spout bs, there isn't even a standardized rating scale. I was under the assumption that a regular person was most likely ltn (yes I know technically low tier means below average making mid tier average)
and why do we use the term sub-5 if most of the time that just means ltn on other chart. I understand why people scale down but on a chart there wont be that many below 3 anyways and we have to account for outliers. Therefore shouldn't the chart be like this:

sub-5: 5>
ltn: 5 - 6
mtn 6 - 7
htn 7- 8
chadlite 8 - 9
"chad" 9 - 10

Additionally aren't most ratings in comparison to yourself. Like its easiest to identify if someone outclasses you or if you outclass someone. IF this is the case do we account for preferences? People have preferences in real life but we don't apply them to this chart at all.

Basically my point is how do you know where you lay on this chart? isn't it best to determine where you land based on social interactions? like how if I found a mtn/mtb good looking they would most likely have to be within my prefered phenotype. On the contrary someone who is htn/htb would probably catch my eye regardless of phenotype. Also how do we account for phenotypes you would never consider at all?

 

[geminer]

what about true adam and adamlite? are they just tiktok slop?

 

[P.Siddy]

A lot of people on this site seem to just spout bs, there isn't even a standardized rating scale. I was under the assumption that a regular person was most likely ltn (yes I know technically low tier means below average making mid tier average)
and why do we use the term sub-5 if most of the time that just means ltn on other chart. I understand why people scale down but on a chart there wont be that many below 3 anyways and we have to account for outliers. Therefore shouldn't the chart be like this:

sub-5: 5>
ltn: 5 - 6
mtn 6 - 7
htn 7- 8
chadlite 8 - 9
"chad" 9 - 10

Additionally aren't most ratings in comparison to yourself. Like its easiest to identify if someone outclasses you or if you outclass someone. IF this is the case do we account for preferences? People have preferences in real life but we don't apply them to this chart at all.

Basically my point is how do you know where you lay on this chart? isn't it best to determine where you land based on social interactions? like how if I found a mtn/mtb good looking they would most likely have to be within my prefered phenotype. On the contrary someone who is htn/htb would probably catch my eye regardless of phenotype. Also how do we account for phenotypes you would never consider at all?

DNR, low ltn

 

[jien]

DNR, low ltn

folk what are you saying

 

[halftime]

Don’t take the rating system so seriously. Most people here treat any phenotype other than white or white-looking as a subhuman even if they have good potential. And as you said, the rating system is not very consistent

 

[TrueGuerilla]

Don’t take the rating system so seriously. Most people here treat any phenotype other than white or white-looking as a subhuman even if they have good potential. And as you said, the rating system is not very consistent

Modern beauty standards revolve around white people

 

[halftime]

Modern beauty standards revolve around white people

It do be that way. But what I mean is that most people here pretend you can’t be good looking unless you’re white and that’s not true, there are still ways to ascend while being from another race

 

[gynogod]

no faggot i will explain it to you if u rep me

 

[Ggnih]

A lot of people on this site seem to just spout bs, there isn't even a standardized rating scale. I was under the assumption that a regular person was most likely ltn (yes I know technically low tier means below average making mid tier average)
and why do we use the term sub-5 if most of the time that just means ltn on other chart. I understand why people scale down but on a chart there wont be that many below 3 anyways and we have to account for outliers. Therefore shouldn't the chart be like this:

sub-5: 5>
ltn: 5 - 6
mtn 6 - 7
htn 7- 8
chadlite 8 - 9
"chad" 9 - 10

Additionally aren't most ratings in comparison to yourself. Like its easiest to identify if someone outclasses you or if you outclass someone. IF this is the case do we account for preferences? People have preferences in real life but we don't apply them to this chart at all.

Basically my point is how do you know where you lay on this chart? isn't it best to determine where you land based on social interactions? like how if I found a mtn/mtb good looking they would most likely have to be within my prefered phenotype. On the contrary someone who is htn/htb would probably catch my eye regardless of phenotype. Also how do we account for phenotypes you would never consider at all?

Retigga

 

[jien]

Retigga

iq mog

 

[soucy77]

A lot of people on this site seem to just spout bs, there isn't even a standardized rating scale. I was under the assumption that a regular person was most likely ltn (yes I know technically low tier means below average making mid tier average)
and why do we use the term sub-5 if most of the time that just means ltn on other chart. I understand why people scale down but on a chart there wont be that many below 3 anyways and we have to account for outliers. Therefore shouldn't the chart be like this:

sub-5: 5>
ltn: 5 - 6
mtn 6 - 7
htn 7- 8
chadlite 8 - 9
"chad" 9 - 10

Additionally aren't most ratings in comparison to yourself. Like its easiest to identify if someone outclasses you or if you outclass someone. IF this is the case do we account for preferences? People have preferences in real life but we don't apply them to this chart at all.

Basically my point is how do you know where you lay on this chart? isn't it best to determine where you land based on social interactions? like how if I found a mtn/mtb good looking they would most likely have to be within my prefered phenotype. On the contrary someone who is htn/htb would probably catch my eye regardless of phenotype. Also how do we account for phenotypes you would never consider at all?

mf seems like a reporter making a documentary

 

[johndoe_]

A lot of people on this site seem to just spout bs, there isn't even a standardized rating scale. I was under the assumption that a regular person was most likely ltn (yes I know technically low tier means below average making mid tier average)
and why do we use the term sub-5 if most of the time that just means ltn on other chart. I understand why people scale down but on a chart there wont be that many below 3 anyways and we have to account for outliers. Therefore shouldn't the chart be like this:

sub-5: 5>
ltn: 5 - 6
mtn 6 - 7
htn 7- 8
chadlite 8 - 9
"chad" 9 - 10

Additionally aren't most ratings in comparison to yourself. Like its easiest to identify if someone outclasses you or if you outclass someone. IF this is the case do we account for preferences? People have preferences in real life but we don't apply them to this chart at all.

Basically my point is how do you know where you lay on this chart? isn't it best to determine where you land based on social interactions? like how if I found a mtn/mtb good looking they would most likely have to be within my prefered phenotype. On the contrary someone who is htn/htb would probably catch my eye regardless of phenotype. Also how do we account for phenotypes you would never consider at all?

The ltn-chad ratings are pretty diverse depending on who you ask. Most people dont know the numbers or what makes someone their rating, they just go off of their opinion. The PSL scale goes from 1-8, with 8 being the „perfect“ face (its impossible to reach, nobody is perfect.) that being said i wouldnt focus too much on ratings, or at least not from random people as its very arbitrary and deviates from person to person.

 

[secretAscendAnon]

It do be that way. But what I mean is that most people here pretend you can’t be good looking unless you’re white and that’s not true, there are still ways to ascend while being from another race

No such thing as race mate