How does religion explain this?

[Deleted member 7580]

Why? no shit evolution is true and some concepts tie in with religion. But the fact the distant ancestors of land Vertebrates evolved from water creatures is farfetched.

Well seems real if you study it in depth

 

[Deleted member 9072]

Well seems real if you study it in depth

 

[Warlow]

View attachment 744971

very little about evolution is "far fetched" you are the wrong person to argue for religion in this thread, leave it to me and @Blackout.xl

 

[Deleted member 9072]

very little about evolution is "far fetched" you are the wrong person to argue for religion in this thread, leave it to me and @Blackout.xl

BELIEVE IN RELIGION AS IS STATED IN YOUR HOLY BOOK AND LAW/RULES. DON'T BE AN APOLOGIST TO FIT NARRATIVES

 

[Warlow]

dawg, you called evolution a theory earlier on in the thread, my dad is hyper-religous and even he acknowledges that evolution occurred.

 

[Deleted member 9072]

dawg, you called evolution a theory earlier on in the thread, my dad is hyper-religous and even he acknowledges that evolution occurred.

My wording was off. Yes evolution is true and concepts tie in with religion. What I meant is no way you can be religious and believe the distant ancestors of land vertebrates including us were evolved from water creatures. That now is farfetched imo

 

[Deleted member 10125]

The thing is, the existence of god doesn’t have to contradict evolution. It’s just that religion is man made, and all religions that are practiced on a large scale were written much before the theory of evolution came to fruition.

Those who wrote these scriptures had no basis on what is now considered basic scientific truths, which is why it has aged so poorly to anyone not blinded by their dogma.

 

[oatmeal]

lul what if karma is real and you were made ugly cuz u didn't stick to your social class and dignity of life. hindus might have a point here

 

[Deleted member 3526]

yeet i guess i was late to the party

gonna tag relevant user so they can hear my words of wisdom

@apollothegun @curryslayerordeath @brbbrah @Salludon @Sikkunt23 @Baldingman1998 @SubhumanCurrycel @sytyl @Mateusz74 @Blackout.xl @XANTARES

Evolutionary biologists generally agree that humans and other living species are descended from bacterialike ancestors.

My question is this

Why did these asexually reproducing bacteria evolved into humans who requires a female companion and sex to reproduce and other complicated things

That's doesnt seem like an advantage ? xd

Also

 

[curryslayerordeath]

yeet i guess i was late to the party

gonna tag relevant user so they can hear my words of wisdom

@apollothegun @curryslayerordeath @brbbrah @Salludon @Sikkunt23 @Baldingman1998 @SubhumanCurrycel @sytyl @Mateusz74 @Blackout.xl @XANTARES





My question is this

Why did these asexually reproducing bacteria evolved into humans who requires a female companion and sex to reproduce and other complicated things

That's doesnt seem like an advantage ? xd

Also

View attachment 745020

when assexually reproducing, the same traits get passed on from generation to generation. so if theres a trait that hurts survival chances, it continues to be propagated to every descendant, which doesnt help the species' survival chances at all.

when sexually reproducing, traits from both the male and female combine together in randomly selected ways, so the descendants arent copies of anything but rather completely new organisms. this means that traits that are helpful for surviving can be made more common as generations go on, helping the species' become more successful. for example, higher complexity organisms have varying roles among their populations (bc of the genetic diversity) so they can complete more involved tasks compared to bacteria.

its prob the most significant advantage, allowing life to explode in diversity like it has

 

[Deleted member 3526]

when assexually reproducing, the same traits get passed on from generation to generation. so if theres a trait that hurts survival chances, it continues to be propagated to every descendant, which doesnt help the species' survival chances at all.

when sexually reproducing, traits from both the male and female combine together in randomly selected ways, so the descendants arent copies of anything but rather completely new organisms. this means that traits that are helpful for surviving can be made more common as generations go on, helping the species' become more successful. for example, higher complexity organisms have varying roles among their populations (bc of the genetic diversity) so they can complete more involved tasks compared to bacteria.

its prob the most significant advantage, allowing life to explode in diversity like it has

bacteria can’t reproduce sexually, but they can exchange genetic information with each other. Using a pilus, two bacteria make contact with each other and exchange genetic material. This is called conjugation. Some bacteria simply take up DNA which is floating around in their environment. The exchangie and uptake of genetic material allows bacteria develop new characteristics. That way, they can adapt and survive in new environments.

 

[Baldingman1998]

yeet i guess i was late to the party

gonna tag relevant user so they can hear my words of wisdom

@apollothegun @curryslayerordeath @brbbrah @Salludon @Sikkunt23 @Baldingman1998 @SubhumanCurrycel @sytyl @Mateusz74 @Blackout.xl @XANTARES





My question is this

Why did these asexually reproducing bacteria evolved into humans who requires a female companion and sex to reproduce and other complicated things

That's doesnt seem like an advantage ? xd

Also

View attachment 745020

Easy as fuck do disprove. Asexual reproduction is for unicellular organisms (simple). Sexual reproduction is needed for more complex animals that have trillions of cells. The other reason is that sexual reproduction makes species have more genetic diversity Wich is good because that will make them more likely to survive an extinction event (environmental, diseases,etcetc)

 

[curryslayerordeath]

View attachment 745040

insanely dark triad micrometer slayers been killing billions of subhumans since the beginning of humanity, u mirin?

 

[Deleted member 3526]

Sexual reproduction is needed for more complex animals that have trillions of cells.

there is no reason for trillions of cells to evolve into species that would just die and fade into nothing-ness
no reason for bacteria's to evolve into species which would go through multiple phases of life i.e kid, adulthood, old age then death

Staying as bacteria is way better

Bacteria don't have a fixed lifespan because they don't grow old. ... You could say that so long as a single one of its descendants survives, the original bacterium does too.

meanwhile in case of humans "The one from whom from lineage starts from" is no more

Spoiler

 

[Baldingman1998]

there is no reason for trillions of cells to evolve into species that would just die and fade into nothing-ness
no reason for bacteria's to evolve into species which would go through multiple phases of life i.e kid, adulthood, old age then death

Staying as bacteria is way better



meanwhile in case of humans real beginner of lineage is no more

Spoiler

View attachment 745047

What do you mean there is no reason?
Being a unicellular organisms is like being a worthless microscopic spec of dust with no free will or anything. The advantages of being a mammal are : insert 10 million words. The reason we age is because the environment as well as dna damage over time. If there was a way to reverse dna damage we would all be immoral,(new research looks promising but Jews will control this tech and only elites will get it)

 

[Deleted member 3526]

Being a unicellular organisms is like being a worthless microscopic spec of dust with no free will

Even though logically it is better for them to stay as bacteria and live on forever rather than becoming something whose consciousness fade away once the body has expired
but for argument sake let's assume they evolve into something such things as "humans" = they are still tiny insignificant particles of dust in the grand scheme of things who still have to " no real purpose" in life.
And it has been established/known truth that we and bacteria both possess consciousness so are we like a body for them that they are controlling if so then why do we possess our own consciousness and have different goals inlife while the organism focus on the internal survival of the body ? so many questions and so little answers

 

[Baldingman1998]

Even though logically it is better for them to stay as bacteria and live on forever rather than becoming something whose consciousness fade away once the body has expired
but for argument sake let's assume they evolve into something such things as "humans" = they are still tiny insignificant particles of dust in the grand scheme of things who still have to " no real purpose" in life.
And it has been established/known truth that we and bacteria both possess consciousness so are we like a body for them that they are controlling if so then why do we possess our own consciousness and have different goals inlife while the organism focus on the internal survival of the body ? so many questions and so little answers

Cooperation. Cells benefit more if they work together as it ensures their survival for a long time

Also your thinking life as an individual. So human a dies but you think bacteria are immortal because they have asexual reproduction. Infact humans have kids so humans are immortal. Same logic. The difference is that asexual reproduction is basically cloning and it's less likely to survive because of limited genetic variance. While sexual reproduction can adapt more easily etc. Life in nature is about reproduction not the individual. Basically we need to keep reproducing to adapt and become better at whatever we need for survival

 

[Baldingman1998]

Even though logically it is better for them to stay as bacteria and live on forever rather than becoming something whose consciousness fade away once the body has expired
but for argument sake let's assume they evolve into something such things as "humans" = they are still tiny insignificant particles of dust in the grand scheme of things who still have to " no real purpose" in life.
And it has been established/known truth that we and bacteria both possess consciousness so are we like a body for them that they are controlling if so then why do we possess our own consciousness and have different goals inlife while the organism focus on the internal survival of the body ? so many questions and so little answers

Wait what? Bacteria literally have no brains how are they conscious? Nucleas isn't brain btw not the same thing

 

[Deleted member 3526]

Wait what? Bacteria literally have no brains how are they conscious? Nucleas isn't brain btw not the same thing

they possess consciousness
i didnt say anything about brain

 

[Deleted member 756]

 

[Baldingman1998]

Cope

 

[Deleted member 756]

Cope

 

[Sikkunt23]

OVER FOR ISLAM COPERS HINDU DINDU GANG OUT

5.6” wrist currycel #ICANTBREED Disciple of ST. ER

 

[Baldingman1998]

they possess consciousness
i didnt say anything about brain

Depends how you define consciousness. I consider humans only to be conscious because we have the ability of abstract thought. We can think of things that aren't there and actually plan things. Predict events etc and our perception of the natural world. We are unique in this and we can have different morals and judgement based on individual values. I still think free will doesn't fully exist for us(simply because we have Biological needs and limitations which we have to abide by/fulfill).

 

[Baldingman1998]

Chad can be whatever he wants and still get women

 

[Deleted member 756]

Chad can be whatever he wants and still get women

 

[Baldingman1998]

 

[Sikkunt23]

Get a hair transplant stop coping with atheism tbh . No atheism for ur hair .

 

[Baldingman1998]

Chad can be whatever he wants and still get women

 

[Deleted member 3526]

Cooperation. Cells benefit more if they work together as it ensures their survival for a long time

you are right about Multicellular Organisms having more of a physical advantage when it comes too survival
bacteria usually have short life span and a minor Injury does lead to it's death

So human a dies but you think bacteria are immortal because they have asexual reproduction. Infact humans have kids so humans are immortal. Same logic. The difference is that asexual reproduction is basically cloning and it's less likely to survive because of limited genetic variance. While sexual reproduction can adapt more easily etc.

sexual reproduction is nothing more than exchange of genetic information on larger microorganic levels

bacteria can’t reproduce sexually, but they can exchange genetic information with each other. Using a pilus, two bacteria make contact with each other and exchange genetic material. This is called conjugation. Some bacteria simply take up DNA which is floating around in their environment

You still havent answered the question, of all the things organism could've evolved into why did they evolve into emotional beings such as human who are not sure of their purpose ?
All the fuckery aside imma be honest i am not really a religious person and i dont care much however i do believe in evolution but evolution doesnt make sense without presence of a will ? either these organic beings possess free will to do whatever they want or either there is an outside source and if that is true then God exist

Evolution doesnt disprove God anyway btw ion know why u trippin

 

[Deleted member 3526]

Depends how you define consciousness. I consider humans only to be conscious because we have the ability of abstract thought. We can think of things that aren't there and actually plan things. Predict events etc and our perception of the natural world. We are unique in this and we can have different morals and judgement based on individual values. I still think free will doesn't fully exist for us(simply because we have Biological needs and limitations which we have to abide by/fulfill).

so are u implying that these "organic beings" not having a free will ?

 

[Baldingman1998]

you are right about Multicellular Organisms having more of a physical advantage when it comes too survival
bacteria usually have short life span and a minor Injury does lead to it's death




sexual reproduction is nothing more than exchange of genetic information on larger microorganic levels



You still havent answered the as to all the things organism could've evolved into why did they evolve into emotional beings such as human who are not sure of their purpose ?
All the fuckery aside imma be honest i am not really a religious person and i dont care much however i do believe in evolution but evolution doesnt make sense without presence of a will ? either these organic beings possess free will to do whatever they want or either there is an outside source and if that is true then God is exist

Evolution doesnt disprove God anyway btw ion know why u trippin

I actually believe in God or a creator or the natural will of the collective consciousness. Whatever it's called. I just think all religion is man made. And no one knows why we evolved this way we can only theorize. Il say what I think which might be completely wrong. We lost physical strength(compared to primates we are very weak) while gaining higher iq, creativity, and memory. We build weapons (stone age) and we use allies from our tribe to hunt together. So cooperation as well as tools was our way of slowly becoming smarter. Mastering the environment by sharpening our fangs(weapons, traps and problem-solving skills/building) while being highly social creatures (empathy and emotional intelligence)

 

[Baldingman1998]

so are u implying that these "organic beings" not having a free will ?

Yes.

 

[Deleted member 9072]

WHOLE THREAD GOT ME LIKE

 

[Baldingman1998]

WHOLE THREAD GOT ME LIKE

 

[Deleted member 9072]

 

[Deleted member 9072]

 

[Deleted member 9003]

 

[Deleted member 3526]

Whatever it's called. I just think all religion is man

death is the only way to know for sure

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

death is the only way to know for sure

That's what's scary, u won't know by that time

 

[Baldingman1998]

That's what's scary, u won't know by that time

 

[Baldingman1998]

Bum

 

[Baldingman1998]

Good night everyone

 

[Arkantos]

I love these bait threads

 

[Baldingman1998]

I love these bait threads

Me 2

 

[redhandsbluehands]

 

[Baldingman1998]

Bum cuz bored

 

[AbandonShip]

Hinduism is the only true religion. Jfl at fuckeer naik copers.

@Blackout.xl @curryslayerordeath @St. Wristcel @Biggdink @Toodlydood @BigBiceps @TsarTsar444

 

[Lolcel]

when assexually reproducing, the same traits get passed on from generation to generation. so if theres a trait that hurts survival chances, it continues to be propagated to every descendant, which doesnt help the species' survival chances at all.

when sexually reproducing, traits from both the male and female combine together in randomly selected ways, so the descendants arent copies of anything but rather completely new organisms. this means that traits that are helpful for surviving can be made more common as generations go on, helping the species' become more successful. for example, higher complexity organisms have varying roles among their populations (bc of the genetic diversity) so they can complete more involved tasks compared to bacteria.

its prob the most significant advantage, allowing life to explode in diversity like it has

But how did bacteria-like ancestors evolved into later organisms if they were the exact copies of their own ancestors? ( As the only way to reproduce was asexual ) from where did the genetic variation came in the earliest organisms?

 

[Lolcel]

Hinduism is the only true religion. Jfl at fuckeer naik copers.

@Blackout.xl @curryslayerordeath @St. Wristcel @Biggdink @Toodlydood @BigBiceps @TsarTsar444

Yes bro
Just cut off an elephant head and put it on human to ascend theory