.*my*.
Kess mah ess
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2020
- Posts
- 22,193
- Reputation
- 22,299
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
feminine emotion and makes you irrationaljust aggression
What's masculine about a man who has anger? How can anyone trust an angry man?A man should have every one except anxiety.
What's masculine about anger? Even science proves that when you get angry the rational part of the brain stops working.Love
Anger
Sadness
Joy
aggression aka low agreeability is a sign of high tWhat's masculine about anger? Even science proves that when you get angry the rational part of the brain stops working.
Sometimes you NEED that Anger/HungrynessWhat's masculine about anger? Even science proves that when you get angry the rational part of the brain stops working.
yeah it's really wonderful because you die early from it tooaggression aka low agreeability is a sign of high t
Low agreability yesaggression aka low agreeability is a sign of high t
Aka a burning desire to do what's right, not angerSometimes you NEED that Anger/Hungryness
isnt it the same? roid rage is a thing tooLow agreability yes
Agression depends
Not the sameisnt it the same? roid rage is a thing too
copeNot the same
Women can be very agressive too but they cant do shit and would bend in the end
Low agreability mean you never "kneel" and dont take shit from anyone
you’re talking about passive-agressivenessfeminine emotion and makes you irrational
all of them but a man should be able to take action despite of his emotions
Copecope
high agreability (female trait) just means that they will backstab you without letting you know before, contrary to men that will make it clear. Aggression is the same.
no I'm not. Aggression comes from anger, anger comes from hate. Doing what's right and having a burning desire to do that is love.you’re talking about passive-agressiveness
all of them but a man should be able to take action despite of his emotions
it’s masculine because he’s dominant and dangerousWhat's masculine about a man who has anger? How can anyone trust an angry man?
no I'm not. Aggression comes from anger, anger comes from hate. Doing what's right and having a burning desire to do that is love.
There's a difference there.
nigga you just described a pathetic ass “man” of inactionCalmness at all points. Not being aggressive, narcy or assertive
Right so it comes from love and it's the desire to do what's right, not aggression.
autism
i can be agressive without being angry or feeling hatred
i’m aggressive because i want to achieve a goal
don't listen to @6’1cel he's a clownCalmness at all points. Not being aggressive, narcy or assertive
not what’s morally right, i’m no cuckto do what's right
I’ve read enough research papers and journals jfl. I know my stuff better than most people here, I’m not debating someone who read meme threads on .me and comes to incorrect conclusionsdon't listen to @6’1cel he's a clown
yeah well i can be agressive without feeling angryAggression is any behavior that results in physical or emotional injury to a person or animal, or one that leads to property damage or destruction. Aggression can be verbal or physical.
if you hate your mom and dad you're angryyeah well i can be agressive without feeling angry
research papers jflI’ve read enough research papers and journals jfl. I know my stuff better than most people here, I’m not debating someone who read meme threads on .me and comes to incorrect conclusions
well I can tell you that every single serial killer that ever existed had anger. you see where I'm going with this?research papers jfl
send me a clinical article that is focussed around finding out what feelings are masculine
Lol look around and see how females act. They’re always narcy, overly aggressive and try to be ‘bad bitches’.research papers jfl
send me a clinical article that is focussed around finding out what feelings are masculine
Every person in the world with normal neuron expression in the amygdala have experienced angerwell I can tell you that every single serial killer that ever existed had anger. you see where I'm going with this?
against subhuman guys maybeLol look around and see how females act. They’re always narcy, overly aggressive and try to be ‘bad bitches’.
In contrast being ‘stoic’ (not related to the philosophy) is a masculine virtue
Right that happens to everyone until they go from the world of their mother (which is fearful, doubtful, angry, confused and hating) to the world of their fathers (which is stoic, calm, rational and loving). If that shift doesn't happen then children remain angry forever.Every person in the world with normal neuron expression in the amygdala have experienced anger
I can tell you that when i’m agressive, i’m doing it solely to dominate a person or situation, in most cases it’s mostly not because i feel anger at anyone or anything
the fuck are you talking about schizoRight that happens to everyone until they go from the world of their mother (which is fearful, doubtful, angry, confused and hating) to the world of their fathers (which is stoic, calm, rational and loving). If that shift doesn't happen then children remain angry forever.
Maybe you’re just not clear on what aggression means. An androgenic man will go to any lengths to protect his family and his interests. Randomly picking on someone and being an asshole for no reason is a sign of being narcy and aggressive for no reason. Estrogen increase catecholamines in the brain and that is the reason for aggressive behaviouragainst subhuman guys maybe
but i garuantee you they’re not agressive, no, rather they’re passive agressive
and what about muh research papers?
you just told me anecdotes and your own opinion
right because they want to discipline them and show them the right way. that's love.the fuck are you talking about schizo
i’m gonna attempt to respond to this schizofrenic abused dog rambling anyway:
which fucking sex do you think overrepresents child beating and abuse?
FATHERS, retard
"I've read the evidence"As for research studies you can read for yourself and if you think I’m wrong then I’d be more than willing to accept my mistake if you provide evidence contrary to what I have said
yeah, which includes picking on random people to for example benefit your interest in being more popularMaybe you’re just not clear on what aggression means. An androgenic man will go to any lengths to protect his family and his interests
Yes, but it's unreasonable to expect a man to never have any anger. Could I trust an angry man? Well, that would depend on why he's angry. There is such a thing as righteous anger.What's masculine about a man who has anger? How can anyone trust an angry man?
"I've read the evidence"
"show it"
"its there, uhh trust me, show me evidence I'm wrong"
Estrogen increases catecholamines in the brain and that is the reason for aggressive behaviour
no such thing as righteous anger. It's all evil and Satan lies to us to make us continue being angry, and anger comes from hate so when we're angry we hate. Jesus wasn't angry.Yes, but it's unreasonable to expect a man to never have any anger. Could I trust an angry man? Well, that would depend on why he's angry. There is such a thing as righteous anger.
I guess what it comes down to is people's long term actions, and if you look at their life as a whole you can make a case if they were angry or not. And Jesus as a whole wasn't an angry person.Matthew 21:12-13
"And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves."
John 2:13-16
"And the Jews' passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem, And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise."
Mark 3:5
"And when he had looked round about on them with anger, being grieved for the hardness of their hearts, he saith unto the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched it out: and his hand was restored whole as the other."
In the first two passages you could argue that he had no anger. But in the last one (Mark 3:5) it explicitly says that Jesus was angry because of the hardness of the people's hearts.
In the book of Proverbs it says that anger rests in the bosoms of fools. "Rests" is the key word. Someone who walks around angry all day, or is easily angered is a fool.I guess what it comes down to is people's long term actions, and if you look at their life as a whole you can make a case if they were angry or not. And Jesus as a whole wasn't an angry person.
Let's use Mohammed as an example. Yes he has a reputation for genocide and conquering, but if you look at when he finally got power over the people who insulted him, beat him, laughed at him, killed his relatives and friends and when he returned to his homeland (Mecca) he forgave those people and let them go. I think these are key moments where you can see if a person really had anger or not.
Just because it's mentioned somewhere that they were angry doesn't say much. We look at their actions from beginning to end and decide.
Jesus led a perfect life. The fact that he got angry shows us that anger can be righteous.I guess what it comes down to is people's long term actions, and if you look at their life as a whole you can make a case if they were angry or not. And Jesus as a whole wasn't an angry person.
Let's use Mohammed as an example. Yes he has a reputation for genocide and conquering, but if you look at when he finally got power over the people who insulted him, beat him, laughed at him, killed his relatives and friends and when he returned to his homeland (Mecca) he forgave those people and let them go. I think these are key moments where you can see if a person really had anger or not.
Just because it's mentioned somewhere that they were angry doesn't say much. We look at their actions from beginning to end and decide.