data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3128/b312851d48607e34946b65d970b908e9148c8303" alt="JeanneDArcAlter"
JeanneDArcAlter
الله أكبر
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2024
- Posts
- 10,798
- Reputation
- 14,184
So your Filipino?You calling me negro JFL while I am a ricecell
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
So your Filipino?You calling me negro JFL while I am a ricecell
He resurrected plus he came as fleshGod can never die. Christianity is a retarded religion.
No ain't sea but NEASo your Filipino?
All humans are with sin so either God in Christianity is not human or is with sinGod can never die. Christianity is a retarded religion.
So do you eat cats or dogs?No ain't sea but NEA
The consequence of sin is death which,All humans are with sin so either God in Christianity is not human or is with sin
Nah dog eating is not popular anymore only to oldcels in the pastSo do you eat cats or dogs?
So he was with sin before dying?The consequence of sin is death which,
resurrection means he overcome death which shows he is God.
He wasn't with sin but he carried humanity's sin in him and killed the sin through his sacrifice of his blood in the cross.So he was with sin before dying?
But tell me did his human part have sin or not? Every human after Adam and Eve was with sin. Your avoiding the questionHe wasn't with sin but he carried humanity's sin in him and killed the sin through his sacrifice of his blood in the cross.
So our sins are dead in the cross and his resurrection also shows our resurrection
No he did not have sin.But tell me did his human part have sin or not? Every human after Adam and Eve was with sin. Your avoiding the question
So he was not humanNo he did not have sin
So he is God that humbled himself with fleshSo he was not human
So your admitting that his human part did have sinSo he is God that humbled himself with flesh
Sins corely come from the unclean spirit since he is God, spiritual being but wore flesh he ain't a sinner.So your admitting that his human part did have sin
So your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being humanSins corely come from the unclean spirit since he is God, spiritual being but wore flesh he ain't a sinner.
So he is God that humbled himself with flesh
Actual human is a sinner so noSo your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being human
Wait wait so im reading this website and it says that humans inherit sin from their father and since Jesuss dad wasnt human he was without sinSo your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being human
Actual human is a sinner so no
it's more accurate to say he wore a flesh
That shows the true love unlike other fake godsGod cannot "humble" Himself. He is Most Majestic and the King of all.
@Aypo129 @Jatt @Mosh12 look at this ramblings of this retarded Christy-cuck ricecel.
So would that mean a baby born through bone marrow is without sin?Wait wait so im reading this website and it says that humans inherit sin from their father and since Jesuss dad wasnt human he was without sin
I feel like its sort of broken logic to bring up a paternally inherited sin system when it was never stated in the bible
So your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being human
"The Greek word translated as “became” is ginomai, meaning “to become.” God did not merely “indwell” the body of a man, but He became a man. This is the powerful revelation of the incarnation and also something that remains mind-numbingly difficult to comprehend, though powerfully true."Actual human is a sinner so no
it's more accurate to say he wore a flesh
So baby who died we suspect they are likely in God's kingdomSo would that mean a baby born through bone marrow is without sin?
We Hindus believe that God is Unlimited, Unbound and all His incarnations are real and not something He "wears". Even though He appeared in forms, He is and was still Formless.
While calling cow "sacred"When humans and other creatures incarnate, they are bound and limited finite creatures.
Jesus spoke to the Father. Which means God talked to Himself. Which is nonsense because God is Omniscient and therefore doesn't need to talk to Himself.
This ricecel is hopeless.
No no, what im saying is you could technically create a child without a father through bone marrowSo baby who died we suspect they are likely in God's kingdom
because God mentions he will not blame of sins that that one didn't know
"The Greek word translated as “became” is ginomai, meaning “to become.” God did not merely “indwell” the body of a man, but He became a man. This is the powerful revelation of the incarnation and also something that remains mind-numbingly difficult to comprehend, though powerfully true."
Referring to John 1:14 btw
Totally contradicts Hinduism. God can never be anything other than Himself as He is Unchanging, therefore Eternal.
You are contradicting yourself hindu indian because if God can do anything he can be human and a spiritual being at a same time.No no, what im saying is you could technically create a child without a father through bone marrow
Wait so you went from saying he is God wearing flesh to avoid contradictions to just saying he is God and human as well and sinless and he can do that because hes God?You are condracting yourself because if God can do anything he can be human and a spiritual being at a same time
What I said isWait so you went from saying he is God wearing flesh to avoid contradictions to just saying he is God and human as well and sinless and he can do that because hes God?
What I said is
Jesus sure was human but he ain't human like in our terms
because his spirit is God, but we aren't but a mere sinful being
You are conracting yourself hindu indian because if God can do anything he can be human and a spiritual being at a same time.
Saying God can't have human form is calling your god not omnipotent
"For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form," this is what it exactly saysWait so you went from saying he is God wearing flesh to avoid contradictions to just saying he is God and human as well and sinless and he can do that because hes God?
Yeah it surely contradicting the term "omnipotent" because our God can be human and God at the same time but your god can't.Yeah that's what we Hindus also believe in. Vishnu/the Sustainer attribute of God "assumed" forms while still being Formless, All-Pervading.
That's why He is at all places, at all times. Because He has complete access to all of His creation because He is Unbound, Infinite and Formless.
Jesus did not say I am the father are same but I am the father are one,![]()
God Did Not “Robe Himself in Flesh.”
We have all heard the phrase, “God robed Himself in the flesh,” but I want to take a quick moment and explain succinctly why we should avoid this phrase and why this phrase is theologic…alphatav.net
So he is human right and therefore sinful but your going to bring him up being God so he can be fully human and sinless at the same timeJesus did not say I am the father are same but I am the father are one,
which means shows he can be God as well as being a human
So he is human right and therefore sinful but your going to bring him up being God so he can be fully human and sinless at the same time
But i sent you that link debunking the claim Jesus is God wearing fleshNo he ain't sinful because his spirit is the holy spirit, God's spirit but our spirit ain't sinless
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 1:14But i sent you that link debunking the claim Jesus is God wearing flesh
Well you know we're referring to the same thingThe Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is more proper wording not wearing
Yeah it surely contradicting the term "omnipotent" because our God can be human and God at the same time but your god can't.
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 1:14
The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is the proper wording not wearing
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God"God simply cannot be human and God at the same time. God is Unchanging.
He cannot be two different entities at the same time. God is just God.
Then that guy is not teaching a proper thing because in the bible it literally says through God's word world is created and God's word is God and God's word became fleshWell you know we're referring to the same thing
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God"
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is more proper wording not wearing.
Hes not saying that God is robed as flesh hes actually claiming the opposite saying that God became fully human in JesusThen that guy is not teaching a proper thing because in the bible it literally says through God's word world is created and God's word is God and God's word became flesh
Light can be a particle and wave at a same time. If light can be then why creator of light God can't?We believe in the same thing as Hindus. That God can incarnate. But you believe that God the Father and the Son are seperate, distinct Trinitarian bullshit. Which is Polytheism.