How many people actually hate me

All humans are with sin so either God in Christianity is not human or is with sin
The consequence of sin is death which,

resurrection means he overcome death which shows he is God.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aypo129 and JeanneDArcAlter
The consequence of sin is death which,

resurrection means he overcome death which shows he is God.
So he was with sin before dying?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
So he was with sin before dying?
He wasn't with sin but he carried humanity's sin in him and killed the sin through his sacrifice of his blood in the cross.

So our sins are dead in the cross and his resurrection also shows our resurrection.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
He wasn't with sin but he carried humanity's sin in him and killed the sin through his sacrifice of his blood in the cross.

So our sins are dead in the cross and his resurrection also shows our resurrection
But tell me did his human part have sin or not? Every human after Adam and Eve was with sin. Your avoiding the question
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
@Aypo129

Look at this hopeless Christian believing that Jesus is "the son of God" lolololol. While we believe that the incarnations of Vishnu are Brahman Himself.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Aypo129
Sins corely come from the unclean spirit since he is God, spiritual being but wore flesh he ain't a sinner.
So your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being human
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
So he is God that humbled himself with flesh

God cannot "humble" Himself. He is Most Majestic and the King of all.

@Aypo129 @Jatt @Mosh12 look at this ramblings of this retarded Christy-cuck ricecel.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Jatt and Aypo129
So your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being human
Wait wait so im reading this website and it says that humans inherit sin from their father and since Jesuss dad wasnt human he was without sin
I feel like its sort of broken logic to bring up a paternally inherited sin system when it was never stated in the bible
Actual human is a sinner so no

it's more accurate to say he wore a flesh
 
God cannot "humble" Himself. He is Most Majestic and the King of all.

@Aypo129 @Jatt @Mosh12 look at this ramblings of this retarded Christy-cuck ricecel.
That shows the true love unlike other fake gods

he is a God that even do something for humanity not just sitting around and I give you wishes.

Like parents who are willing to do anything for their childs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Wait wait so im reading this website and it says that humans inherit sin from their father and since Jesuss dad wasnt human he was without sin
I feel like its sort of broken logic to bring up a paternally inherited sin system when it was never stated in the bible
So would that mean a baby born through bone marrow is without sin?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129 and HostSamurai
So your saying he was just god wearing a human costume rather than actually being human

We Hindus believe that God is Unlimited, Unbound and all His incarnations are real and not something He "wears". Even though He appeared in forms, He is and was still Formless.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: Aypo129, HostSamurai and JeanneDArcAlter
Actual human is a sinner so no

it's more accurate to say he wore a flesh
"The Greek word translated as “became” is ginomai, meaning “to become.” God did not merely “indwell” the body of a man, but He became a man. This is the powerful revelation of the incarnation and also something that remains mind-numbingly difficult to comprehend, though powerfully true."
Referring to John 1:14 btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
So would that mean a baby born through bone marrow is without sin?
So baby who died we suspect they are likely in God's kingdom

because God mentions he will not blame of sins that one didn't know.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aypo129 and JeanneDArcAlter
We Hindus believe that God is Unlimited, Unbound and all His incarnations are real and not something He "wears". Even though He appeared in forms, He is and was still Formless.

When humans and other creatures incarnate, they are bound and limited finite creatures.

Jesus spoke to the Father. Which means God talked to Himself. Which is nonsense because God is Omniscient and therefore doesn't need to talk to Himself.

This ricecel is hopeless.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
When humans and other creatures incarnate, they are bound and limited finite creatures.

Jesus spoke to the Father. Which means God talked to Himself. Which is nonsense because God is Omniscient and therefore doesn't need to talk to Himself.

This ricecel is hopeless.
While calling cow "sacred"
Main qimg afb78681ce0abc9fb499e0ce1b6e3ff2 lq
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Aypo129
So baby who died we suspect they are likely in God's kingdom

because God mentions he will not blame of sins that that one didn't know
No no, what im saying is you could technically create a child without a father through bone marrow
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
"The Greek word translated as “became” is ginomai, meaning “to become.” God did not merely “indwell” the body of a man, but He became a man. This is the powerful revelation of the incarnation and also something that remains mind-numbingly difficult to comprehend, though powerfully true."
Referring to John 1:14 btw

Totally contradicts Hinduism. God can never be anything other than Himself as He is Unchanging, therefore Eternal.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aypo129 and JeanneDArcAlter
Totally contradicts Hinduism. God can never be anything other than Himself as He is Unchanging, therefore Eternal.
No no, what im saying is you could technically create a child without a father through bone marrow
You are contradicting yourself hindu indian because if God can do anything he can be human and a spiritual being at a same time.

Saying God can't have human form is calling your god not omnipotent.

Jesus sure was human but he ain't human like in our terms

because his spirit is God, but we aren't but a mere sinful being
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Aypo129
You are condracting yourself because if God can do anything he can be human and a spiritual being at a same time
Wait so you went from saying he is God wearing flesh to avoid contradictions to just saying he is God and human as well and sinless and he can do that because hes God?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Wait so you went from saying he is God wearing flesh to avoid contradictions to just saying he is God and human as well and sinless and he can do that because hes God?
What I said is
Jesus sure was human but he ain't human like in our terms

because we can't miracles or not sin at all

because his spirit is God, he came as human but not concept of human like us
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Aypo129 and JeanneDArcAlter
What I said is
Jesus sure was human but he ain't human like in our terms

because his spirit is God, but we aren't but a mere sinful being
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
You are conracting yourself hindu indian because if God can do anything he can be human and a spiritual being at a same time.

Saying God can't have human form is calling your god not omnipotent

Yeah that's what we Hindus also believe in. Vishnu/the Sustainer attribute of God "assumed" forms while still being Formless, All-Pervading.

That's why He is at all places, at all times. Because He has complete access to all of His creation because He is Unbound, Infinite and Formless.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Wait so you went from saying he is God wearing flesh to avoid contradictions to just saying he is God and human as well and sinless and he can do that because hes God?
"For in Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form," this is what it exactly says
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Yeah that's what we Hindus also believe in. Vishnu/the Sustainer attribute of God "assumed" forms while still being Formless, All-Pervading.

That's why He is at all places, at all times. Because He has complete access to all of His creation because He is Unbound, Infinite and Formless.
Yeah it surely contradicting the term "omnipotent" because our God can be human and God at the same time but your god can't.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Jesus did not say I am the father are same but I am the father are one,

which means shows he can be God as well as being a human.
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129 and JeanneDArcAlter
Jesus did not say I am the father are same but I am the father are one,

which means shows he can be God as well as being a human
So he is human right and therefore sinful but your going to bring him up being God so he can be fully human and sinless at the same time
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
So he is human right and therefore sinful but your going to bring him up being God so he can be fully human and sinless at the same time

No he ain't sinful because his spirit is the holy spirit, God's spirit but our spirit ain't sinless.

It is our spirit and soul that makes us evil and do sinful things.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Hey Ricecel, how can you believe that God the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are 3 separate and distinct entities? That's Polytheism and therefore heresy. You believe in a "Trinity" while we believe that Vishnu, God the Sustainer = Brahman/God = fully His incarnations. There is no distinction or seperateness because God is Absolute Oneness.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
No he ain't sinful because his spirit is the holy spirit, God's spirit but our spirit ain't sinless
But i sent you that link debunking the claim Jesus is God wearing flesh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
But i sent you that link debunking the claim Jesus is God wearing flesh
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 1:14


The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is the proper wording not wearing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is more proper wording not wearing
Well you know we're referring to the same thing
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Yeah it surely contradicting the term "omnipotent" because our God can be human and God at the same time but your god can't.

God simply cannot be human and God at the same time. God is Unchanging. 😂

He cannot be two different entities at the same time. God is just God.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth. John 1:14


The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is the proper wording not wearing

"Came from the Father" So that means the source of Jesus is God the Creator? What heresy is this shit? Filthy Polytheist. Kuffar. Goyim dog.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
God simply cannot be human and God at the same time. God is Unchanging. 😂

He cannot be two different entities at the same time. God is just God.
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God"
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is more proper wording not wearing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Well you know we're referring to the same thing
Then that guy is not teaching a proper thing because in the bible it literally says through God's word world is created and God's word is God and God's word became flesh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God"
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

The bible literally says the God's Word became flesh so then became flesh is more proper wording not wearing.

We believe in the same thing as Hindus. That God can incarnate. But you believe that God the Father and the Son are seperate, distinct Trinitarian bullshit. Which is Polytheism.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
Then that guy is not teaching a proper thing because in the bible it literally says through God's word world is created and God's word is God and God's word became flesh
Hes not saying that God is robed as flesh hes actually claiming the opposite saying that God became fully human in Jesus
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
We believe in the same thing as Hindus. That God can incarnate. But you believe that God the Father and the Son are seperate, distinct Trinitarian bullshit. Which is Polytheism.
Light can be a particle and wave at a same time. If light can be then why creator of light God can't?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129

Similar threads

Volksstaffel
Replies
2
Views
21
xombie
xombie
urrate
Replies
4
Views
59
Skara
Skara
wastedspermcel
Replies
9
Views
95
wastedspermcel
wastedspermcel
Dutchcel01
Replies
0
Views
21
Dutchcel01
Dutchcel01

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top