How much does your face change from 16-20

[User_1293]

.

 

[formidable]

depends

 

[Vireon]

significantly, your cranium bones are basically complete and buccal fat dies down

 

[81xa]

significantly, your cranium bones are basically complete and buccal fat dies down

what about 18-20

 

[ICL]

I have a good example

 

[Vireon]

what about 18-20

Not by much

Maybe the bones just stronger.

Frame is the only real difference.

 

[sokco_gray_slayer]

.

 

[ICL]

TikTok - Make Your Day

 

[ICL]

what about 18-20

I'd say changes to the chin and mandible would only be present. Besides, that's when the mandible stops growing.

Although your facial muscles may get bigger which is an illusion for "bigger bones" in reality the bones dont have size

 

[Dizzle]

significantly, your cranium bones are basically complete and buccal fat dies down

mark as solution ^

I'd say changes to the chin and mandible would only be present. Besides, that's when the mandible stops growing.

Although your facial muscles may get bigger which is an illusion for "bigger bones" in reality the bones dont have size

 

[ICL]

mark as solution ^


View attachment 4948634

Wow, surely the greys are gonna feel how unappealing my slightly incorrect response was. They will repulse against me... As if I said something stupid in this reply section specifically.

 

[ICL]

mark as solution ^


View attachment 4948634

You're acting like I'm some kind of enemy to you? Why are you so triggered

 

[Dizzle]

Wow, surely the greys are gonna feel how unappealing my slightly incorrect response was. They will repulse against me... As if I said something stupid in this reply section specifically.

Its just the fact that you were specifically wrong about that effect. That basically shows where you fall on the graph you used, even though the graph itself is false lol. So everyone should take what you say with a few grains of salt.

 

[Dizzle]

You're acting like I'm some kind of enemy to you? Why are you so triggered

because your are blissfully ignorant

 

[ICL]

Its just the fact that you were specifically wrong about that effect. That basically shows where you fall on the graph you used, even though the graph itself is false lol. So everyone should take what you say with a few grains of salt.

Erm... I didn't use the graph.

I made a clearly satire statement with "endogenous insulin" which I didn't think too much of.

Then I just slid in a google definition because I couldn't care less about a subtle mistake I made. Then you replied something which I repped, but, tiger mogger told you're the dunning kruger effect, NOT ME.

Then apparently everyone has to take what I say unseriously, even though I actually presented something useful in a new thread.

 

[ICL]

because your are blissfully ignorant

For some minor endogenous insulin joke? Get a grip, these are big conclusions for small actions... Now apparently I'm such a bad person you have to mention this on unrelated threads even though I provided something beneficial?

 

[Dizzle]

Erm... I didn't use the graph.

I made a clearly satire statement with "endogenous insulin" which I didn't think too much of.


For some minor endogenous insulin joke? Get a grip, these are big conclusions for small actions... Now apparently I'm such a bad person you have to mention this on unrelated threads even though I provided something beneficial?

Its fine if you make a mistake and own up to it but trying to defend it with such a braindead excuse just puts you in a worse
position

tiger mogger told you're the dunning kruger effect, NOT ME.

THATS THE THING LMFAOO you took liberty to reply on his behalf when the question was cleary directed towards him and you STILL got it wrong

Then apparently everyone has to take what I say unseriously, even though I actually presented something useful in a new thread.

i never said to take you unseriously, but to take what you say with a grain of salt because you are ignorant. Im not saying you are straight up lying but that you might simply lack the knowledge on a certain topic, yet you will still awnser with confidence, which could mislead people.

 

[ICL]

Its fine if you make a mistake and own up to it but trying to defend it with sucha braindead excuse just puts you in a worse position

What excuse nigga, you flamed me once I send you the dunning kruger "graph", thats the mistake. Yet you're saying something without explaining and calling it an "excuse"

HATS THE THING LMFAOO you took liberty to reply on his behalf when the question was cleary directed towards him and you STILL got it wrong

Unfortunately because I made a very subtle mistake with a "graph" ?
I sent what you asked for and made a mistake

Even if I searched dunning kruger graph picture I wouldn't find a dunning kruger graph because i'd instinctively use the first picture i see

i never said to take you unseriosly, but to take what you say with a grain of salt because you are ignorant. Im not saying you are straight up lying but that you might simply lack the knowledge on a certain topic, but still awnser with confidence which could mislead people.

If I lack knowledge on one sphere of a topic, why mention it on another sphere? Clearly my answer here, in this thread, was and is rational and you're just harassing me

 

[ICL]

because you are ignorant.

Well, you're yet to tell me why I'm exactly ignorant.

A mistake isn't ignorance, your question was unnecessarily nuanced... Tiger mogger didnt even say dunning kruger graph, why did you mention graph? It seems like you're just trying to test us for... i dont know... you'd know

 

[Dizzle]

Unfortunately because I made a very subtle mistake with a "graph" ?
I sent what you asked for and made a mistake
View attachment 4948687

Even if I searched dunning kruger graph picture I wouldn't find a dunning kruger graph because i'd instinctively use the first picture i see

If I lack know

Well, you're yet to tell me why I'm exactly ignorant.

A mistake isn't ignorance, your question was unnecessarily nuanced...

Youre right that a mistake isnt ignorance, but the fact that you have literally sent a screenshot of your mouse hovering over a picture that explains that what you sent is false, and the right graph on the right, gives me a good reason to call you ignorant.

What excuse nigga, you flamed me once I send you the dunning kruger "graph", thats the mistake. Yet you're saying something without explaining and calling it an "excuse"

You never made a ''joke'' about the definition of endogenous or exogenous you were dead serious and wrong. thats the excuse i mentioned.

Tiger mogger didnt even say dunning kruger graph, why did you mention graph? It seems like you're just trying to test us for... i dont know... you'd know

is this suppossed to be a joke aswell, or are you truly this retarded? Exactly following your own logic, which is ''sending the first picture on google'' you literally see the definition of dunning kruger linked to a certain graph when searching it up. I was trying to ''test'' if tiger knew the context of dunning kruger or was using it ignorantly. I never wanted to ''test'' you as you never mentioned dunning kruger however, you replied for some reason. He called me a ''iqlet'' because he was wrong and his feelings got hurt

 

[ICL]

Youre right that a mistake isnt ignorance, but the fact that you have literally sent a screenshot of your mouse hovering over a picture that explains that what you sent is false, and the right graph on the right, gives me a good reason to call you ignorant.

Yea because i've obviously understood what the graph was now, do I have to mention that as well? what the discussion is about now is you calling me ignorant over something so miniscule.

You never made a ''joke'' about the definition of endogenous or exogenous you were dead serious and wrong. thats the excuse i mentioned.

Injecting endogenous slin is obviously a joke. Maybe not the facts around if slin can be injected and still be endogenous. But it's clear that taking someones bodily slin and injecting it to yourself is 100% comical and satire

is this suppossed to be a joke aswell, or are you truly this retarded? Exactly following your own logic, which is ''sending the first picture on google'' you literally see the definition of dunning kruger linked to a certain graph when searching it up. I was trying to ''test'' if tiger knew the context of dunning kruger or was using it ignorantly. I never wanted to ''test'' you as you never mentioned dunning kruger however, you replied for some reason. He called me a ''iqlet'' because he was wrong and his feelings got hurt

I'd believe something that was shown overwhelmingly more than the thing presented. That's what I saw most, and, the search engine should direct me properly, not my fault it didn't give me the perfect example. I wasn't even thinking of this chain reaction happening after I sent the image, just felt like sending dunning kruger effect. I don't know why, because i didn't care enough

 

[Genio]

Wow, surely the greys are gonna feel how unappealing my slightly incorrect response was. They will repulse against me... As if I said something stupid in this reply section specifically.

Chad's just DNR their hating peasants

 

[Dizzle]

Yea because i've obviously understood what the graph was now, do I have to mention that as well? what the discussion is about now is you calling me ignorant over something so miniscule.

Injecting endogenous slin is obviously a joke. Maybe not the facts around if slin can be injected and still be endogenous. But it's clear that taking someones bodily slin and injecting it to yourself is 100% comical and satire

I'd believe something that was shown overwhelmingly more than the thing presented. That's what I saw most, and, the search engine should direct me properly, not my fault it didn't give me the perfect example. I wasn't even thinking of this chain reaction happening after I sent the image, just felt like sending dunning kruger effect. I don't know why, because i didn't care enough

im ending the discussion because arguing with you serves 0 purpose as you can not see your own faults and admit when you are wrong.

 

[ICL]

Youre right that a mistake isnt ignorance, but the fact that you have literally sent a screenshot of your mouse hovering over a picture that explains that what you sent is false, and the right graph on the right, gives me a good reason to call you ignorant.

You never made a ''joke'' about the definition of endogenous or exogenous you were dead serious and wrong. thats the excuse i mentioned.


is this suppossed to be a joke aswell, or are you truly this retarded? Exactly following your own logic, which is ''sending the first picture on google'' you literally see the definition of dunning kruger linked to a certain graph when searching it up. I was trying to ''test'' if tiger knew the context of dunning kruger or was using it ignorantly. I never wanted to ''test'' you as you never mentioned dunning kruger however, you replied for some reason. He called me a ''iqlet'' because he was wrong and his feelings got hurt

You seem to not respond to every point I make. Am I still the ignorant person here?

Inb4 you create yet another segment for this useless argument, this isn't even about looksmax anymore. Nobody cares about a mistake I did... you're ROI here is 0

 

[ICL]

im ending the discussion because arguing with you has 0 purpose as you can not see your own faults and admit when you are wrong.

Okay. That's fine, be ignorant yourself, instead of explaining anything you say you just make statements.

Rq save this and come back 2-3 years and realize how cocky this interraction was

 

[ropemaxxer00]

Alot

 

[160cmcurry]

depends on your genetics

 

[asdvek]

Zero. Doesn't change at all other than some buccal fat. Your cranial bones are done developing at 6.