SkiSquadJPG
True Lech descendant 🇵🇱🦅
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2025
- Posts
- 1,224
- Reputation
- 1,381
A retard is anyone with an iq below 70 (mild retardation) to below 20 (profound retardation).
But how does one recogognize a retard?
One way is to inspect their posts and find common logical failures or inconsistencies, here's an example:
As we see this individual (@fwhr glazer ) saw a post stating that race is not the main factor for facial beauty, height, iq, frame or penile length.
The person in question then claimed that this statement is equal to saying an average asian looks the same as an average european.
Why is this claim not true? Simply put, the original post (by @SkiSquadJPG ) did not claim that race doesnt affect appearance but merely that PSL in regards to the different "pills" discussed in the same thread is not mainly affected by race. (But that rather other genetic factors greater contribute to it)
This is a perfect example of mild retardation, however this posting alone is a relatively small sample size and further study of specimen should be conducted.
Another example:
The individual (@zyzz007 returns ) made a posting and thread where he (although I have my suspiciouns it's a she) claimed to have found an indian stacy.
That would be a clear logical fallacy as Indians are excempt from achieving stacy status and one can as such not be both indian and stacy.
To further negate the individual's claim I am providing an image of this suppsed stacy:
Clearly and example of severe mental retardation (20-40 iq)
@hopecel @arbiter891 @AverageTevvezFan
But how does one recogognize a retard?
One way is to inspect their posts and find common logical failures or inconsistencies, here's an example:
As we see this individual (@fwhr glazer ) saw a post stating that race is not the main factor for facial beauty, height, iq, frame or penile length.
The person in question then claimed that this statement is equal to saying an average asian looks the same as an average european.
Why is this claim not true? Simply put, the original post (by @SkiSquadJPG ) did not claim that race doesnt affect appearance but merely that PSL in regards to the different "pills" discussed in the same thread is not mainly affected by race. (But that rather other genetic factors greater contribute to it)
This is a perfect example of mild retardation, however this posting alone is a relatively small sample size and further study of specimen should be conducted.
Another example:
The individual (@zyzz007 returns ) made a posting and thread where he (although I have my suspiciouns it's a she) claimed to have found an indian stacy.
That would be a clear logical fallacy as Indians are excempt from achieving stacy status and one can as such not be both indian and stacy.
To further negate the individual's claim I am providing an image of this suppsed stacy:
Clearly and example of severe mental retardation (20-40 iq)
Some of you may have me, @SkiSquadJPG, (who is indeed a shizophrenic) to be a profound retard since I in this very post describe how race doesnt matter to SMV while also claiming indians cant be stacies.
This claim would be extraordinarily unconsidering considering this posting, that you are reading, is not a statement of its own but rather a study of contradictory statements and how it could be linked to differing degrees of mental retardation. Furthermore it is common knowledge in this forum that indian 'foids' are not of genus "homo sapiens" and that their SMVs are therefore not applicable to any normal scale.
This claim would be extraordinarily unconsidering considering this posting, that you are reading, is not a statement of its own but rather a study of contradictory statements and how it could be linked to differing degrees of mental retardation. Furthermore it is common knowledge in this forum that indian 'foids' are not of genus "homo sapiens" and that their SMVs are therefore not applicable to any normal scale.
@hopecel @arbiter891 @AverageTevvezFan
