Humans are tropical and primarily fruitarian

[optimisticzoomer]

People like to talk nonsense about muh our ancestors

Humans ate what was available to them

Our ancestors in cold climates weren't eating a lot of fruits because they weren't available

But humans are still a tropical species. And that is where we would and should be eating large quantities of fruit. Obviously everything got fucked up by overpopulation, but eat mostly fruitarian, like chimpanzees

 

[optimisticzoomer]

0

 

[ihatereddit]

humans are opportunistic omnivores, can eat basically anything except for tree bark and literal poison
jfl at thinking primitive humans followed a "diet" they literally just ate whatever was in front of them that didnt kill them

 

[optimisticzoomer]

humans are opportunistic omnivores, can eat basically anything except for tree bark and literal poison
jfl at thinking primitive humans followed a "diet" they literally just ate whatever was in front of them that didnt kill them

That was basically my post
But humans are a tropical species and thus we should eat like one. Which means plenty of fruits

 

[Debetro]

Is africa tropical

 

[chrishell]

Is africa tropical

 

[childishkillah]

Idk man, i just get no pussy

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Is africa tropical

Yes
I used to live in the Gambia. Perhaps that's why I know how to live

 

[optimisticzoomer]

View attachment 3722110View attachment 3722111View attachment 3722112

 

[SoundnVision]

View attachment 3722110View attachment 3722111View attachment 3722112

Bergval?

 

[Sub5UglyMan]

Humans eat whatever they can catch. Only retards go on diets.

 

[Andremln]

People like to talk nonsense about muh our ancestors

Humans ate what was available to them

Our ancestors in cold climates weren't eating a lot of fruits because they weren't available

But humans are still a tropical species. And that is where we would and should be eating large quantities of fruit. Obviously everything got fucked up by overpopulation, but eat mostly fruitarian, like chimpanzees

The amount of evidence suggesting that we adapted to eat meat is too strong for this to be completely true, but yes, simple sugars are incredibly important, especially for cognition.

 

[Skull Based Sage]

The amount of evidence suggesting that we adapted to eat meat is too strong for this to be completely true, but yes, simple sugars are incredibly important, especially for cognition.

Don’t tell this to the raw carnivore diet fags

 

[Andremln]

Don’t tell this to the raw carnivore diet fags

they're too dumb to understand that being omnivore increases survival chances in nature

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Humans eat whatever they can catch. Only retards go on diets.

Obviously
But that doesn't apply to modern humans where we can buy whatever we want

 

[Skull Based Sage]

they're too dumb to understand that being omnivore increases survival chances in nature

So many unauthentic “medical doctors” and “physicists” on social media promoting these kinds of mostly meat based diets these days, as a result the average social media user gets easily influenced by these grifters and trends due to a lack of understanding of evolutionary biology and nutrition

 

[optimisticzoomer]

The amount of evidence suggesting that we adapted to eat meat is too strong for this to be completely true, but yes, simple sugars are incredibly important, especially for cognition.

Chimpanzees also eat meat
Less than 2% of their diet
Plus insects
But mostly plant foods

 

[Andremln]

Chimpanzees also eat meat
Less than 2% of their diet
Plus insects
But mostly plant foods

But we aren't chimpanzees, we just share a common ancestor with other primates

we adapted to be more omnivorish so we could eat basically anything

 

[optimisticzoomer]

But we aren't chimpanzees, we just share a common ancestor with other primates

we adapted to be more omnivorish so we could eat basically anything

A chimp could probably eat as much meat as us if it had to
It's not about what our body "needs" or is capable of eating. It's about what's available. Just because humans in high latitudes got used to eating more meat because less other stuff was available, and that has led to a cultural shift across the world, doesn't mean that's what it should be

 

[Andremln]

A chimp could probably eat as much meat as us if it had to
It's not about what our body "needs" or is capable of eating. It's about what's available. Just because humans in high latitudes got used to eating more meat because less other stuff was available, and that has led to a cultural shift across the world, doesn't mean that's what it should be

We have a different digestive system compared to the ones of other apes, ours tapers downwards signaling a smaller digestive tract and we have reduced gut volume, this anatomical adaptation supports the expensive tissue hypothesis which states that a metabolic trade-off happened in humans, the reduction in gut size compensates for the exceptionally high demand of energy that the brain has, it consumes around 20% of our resting energy despite comprising only 2% of body weight, this was possible due to eating easier to digest foods such as simple sugars found in fruits, milk and honey, meat and especially cooked meat

Brains and guts in human evolution: The Expensive Tissue Hypothesis

The brain is a very expensive organ in metabolic terms. Each unit of brain tissue requires over...

www.scielo.br

 

[chrishell]

Bergval?

Yes what do you think?

 

[SoundnVision]

Yes what do you think?

Very good looking