I am returned in serene indignation.

[Сигма Бой]

That dysfunctional & imperious overlady titled as @highinhibcel spuriously executed an unreasonable 30% warning upon oneself of which engendered Our paschal triduum crucifixion.

As of Thursday, 17. April 2025, Our total warning percentage composes of an exceedingly inflated 80% warning.

That aforementioned Jewess inappropriately banned Ourself for assumedly mass-tagging, which is evidently counterfactual insomuch as the mass-tagging law pertains not until there exist more than one million mentions within one thread. Whereupon that aforementioned sheboon insisted that 28 mentions is mass-tagging, wherefore We hath inferred that it would solely certify as mass-tagging when one is exceeding one million mentions within one thread via educating xir anent the formal definition of the word massive. Thereafter xe closed Our private conversation in ireful ignorance, which is apparent TFB. Therefore myself requests one gender inspection towards that beforenamed pseudomale.

Moreover, @emeraldglass pronounced that if one user mentions more than 5 users within one thread, one is infringing the unformulated 5 mentions rule given by him.

5 mentions per thread is the law not per post.

Thereby justifying executing one honorable 30% warning upon xir for unlawfully mentioning 7 users within one post.

@halfbloodaryanmaxxe @Numb The Pain @NumbThePain @Orc @Ron.Belgrade @JohnBaza @RealFunkyFlamingo

Sauce: https://looksmax.org/threads/doutze...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/
Webpage archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20250417...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/

#investigatehighinhibcel

@TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan

 

[Loruki]

Not a molecule

 

[Surfsup]

 

[Arthur the Egyptian]

 

[emeraldglass]

Let me provide a succinct elucidation of the narrative recently recounted by my esteemed correspondent. The individual in question suffered a temporary suspension for violating regulations regarding mentions. Upon being approached to serve as an adjudicator, I concurred with the imposed penalty after a thorough and incontrovertible presentation of evidence. I maintained that five mentions represent the requisite threshold for tagging within a discussion thread. My friend, however, dismissed this standard as preposterous, arguing that only an exorbitant number, say, one million mentions, could justify the term “massive.” In response, I contended that the term “massive” is intrinsically contextual. Thus, in a scenario where five mentions constitute the norm, a count of six indeed qualifies as massive. Because by definition, what exceeds the norm in a given system may rightly be called massive.

 

[brownmutt42]

Did you clap babushka cheeks?

 

[Сигма Бой]

Let me provide a succinct elucidation of the narrative recently recounted by my esteemed correspondent. The individual in question suffered a temporary suspension for violating regulations regarding mentions. Upon being approached to serve as an adjudicator, I concurred with the imposed penalty after a thorough and incontrovertible presentation of evidence. I maintained that five mentions represent the requisite threshold for tagging within a discussion thread. My friend, however, dismissed this standard as preposterous, arguing that only an exorbitant number, say, one million mentions, could justify the term “massive.” In response, I contended that the term “massive” is intrinsically contextual. Thus, in a scenario where five mentions constitute the norm, a count of six indeed qualifies as massive. Because by definition, what exceeds the norm in a given system may rightly be called massive.

That is inaccurate, 1,000,000 is not massive by the definition. It is massive once it exceeds the numeral value of 1,000,000. However, We adhere to the additional 5 mentions law given by thyself, your lordness.

 

[Сигма Бой]

Not a molecule

Read through Our thread, yer beslothed nigger!

 

[emeraldglass]

That is inaccurate, 1,000,000 is not massive by the definition. It is massive once it exceeds the numeral value of 1,000,000. However, We adhere to the additional 5 mentions law given by thyself, your lordness.

We humbly recognize your deferential adherence to the rules, dear friend.

 

[Сигма Бой]

We humbly recognize your deferential adherence to the rules, dear friend.

That is excellent! Therefore, promptly perform one 30% warning unto highinhibcel, your uprightness.

 

[widehipcel]

Sigma boy has Returned from Exile!!

Mossadic moderation Cannot repress the Truth

@loyolaxavvierretard

 

[Сигма Бой]

We humbly recognize your deferential adherence to the rules, dear friend.

Softly, divulge highinhibcel's total warning percentage, your revealingness.

 

[ToryToad]

That dysfunctional & imperious overlady titled as @highinhibcel spuriously executed an unreasonable 30% warning upon oneself of which engendered Our paschal triduum crucifixion.

As of Thursday, 17. April 2025, Our total warning percentage composes of an exceedingly inflated 80% warning.

That aforementioned Jewess inappropriately banned Ourself for assumedly mass-tagging, which is evidently counterfactual insomuch as the mass-tagging law pertains not until there exist more than one million mentions within one thread. Whereupon that aforementioned sheboon insisted that 28 mentions is mass-tagging, wherefore We hath inferred that it would solely certify as mass-tagging when one is exceeding one million mentions within one thread via educating xir anent the formal definition of the word massive. Thereafter xe closed Our private conversation in ireful ignorance, which is apparent TFB. Therefore myself requests one gender inspection towards that beforenamed pseudomale.

Moreover, @emeraldglass pronounced that if one user mentions more than 5 users within one thread, one is infringing the unformulated 5 mentions rule given by him.

Thereby justifying executing one honorable 30% warning upon xir for unlawfully mentioning 7 users within one post.

Sauce: https://looksmax.org/threads/doutze...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/
Webpage archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20250417...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/

#investigatehighinhibcel

@TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan

mogs

 

[Сигма Бой]

Sigma boy has Returned from Exile!!

Mossadic moderation Cannot repress the Truth

@loyolaxavvierretard

Сигма Бой has risen.

 

[widehipcel]

Сигма Бой has risen.

The children rejoice and the Streets are once again filled with rivers of Gold

PTC is as always at yer behest, great Foreman

 

[Сигма Бой]

The children rejoice and the Streets are once again filled with rivers of Gold

PTC is as always at yer behest, great Foreman

We art delighted anent hearing that, your meekness.

 

[Сигма Бой]

 

[Ogionth]

That dysfunctional & imperious overlady titled as @highinhibcel spuriously executed an unreasonable 30% warning upon oneself of which engendered Our paschal triduum crucifixion.

As of Thursday, 17. April 2025, Our total warning percentage composes of an exceedingly inflated 80% warning.

That aforementioned Jewess inappropriately banned Ourself for assumedly mass-tagging, which is evidently counterfactual insomuch as the mass-tagging law pertains not until there exist more than one million mentions within one thread. Whereupon that aforementioned sheboon insisted that 28 mentions is mass-tagging, wherefore We hath inferred that it would solely certify as mass-tagging when one is exceeding one million mentions within one thread via educating xir anent the formal definition of the word massive. Thereafter xe closed Our private conversation in ireful ignorance, which is apparent TFB. Therefore myself requests one gender inspection towards that beforenamed pseudomale.

Moreover, @emeraldglass pronounced that if one user mentions more than 5 users within one thread, one is infringing the unformulated 5 mentions rule given by him.

Thereby justifying executing one honorable 30% warning upon xir for unlawfully mentioning 7 users within one post.

Sauce: https://looksmax.org/threads/doutze...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/
Webpage archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20250417...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/

#investigatehighinhibcel

@TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan

EXECUTE HIM-!

 

[short ginger ugly]

DNRD moderators are always right

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

Sigma boy has Returned from Exile!!

Mossadic moderation Cannot repress the Truth

@loyolaxavvierretard

Now the two sigmas will run riot on this forum. Or

 

[Сигма Бой]

EXECUTE HIM-!

Righteous opinion!

 

[Сигма Бой]

DNRD moderators are always right

Read that post, you ZOGbot!

 

[Healthymaxxer]

they gonna ban you again for that jfl

 

[Сигма Бой]

Now the two sigmas will run riot on this forum. Or

There are many sigmas within this internet forum, such as myself (the Most Sigma).

 

[Healthymaxxer]

Let me provide a succinct elucidation of the narrative recently recounted by my esteemed correspondent. The individual in question suffered a temporary suspension for violating regulations regarding mentions. Upon being approached to serve as an adjudicator, I concurred with the imposed penalty after a thorough and incontrovertible presentation of evidence. I maintained that five mentions represent the requisite threshold for tagging within a discussion thread. My friend, however, dismissed this standard as preposterous, arguing that only an exorbitant number, say, one million mentions, could justify the term “massive.” In response, I contended that the term “massive” is intrinsically contextual. Thus, in a scenario where five mentions constitute the norm, a count of six indeed qualifies as massive. Because by definition, what exceeds the norm in a given system may rightly be called massive.

fuck norms, love philosophical arguments

 

[Сигма Бой]

they gonna ban you again for that jfl

Whyfor?

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

There are many sigmas within this internet forum, such as myself (the Most Sigma).

Okay widehipcel

 

[Healthymaxxer]

Whyfor?

 

[Сигма Бой]

Okay widehipcel

I and Our only begotten son are one.

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

I and Our only begotten son are one.

Excellent user

 

[Healthymaxxer]

Excellent user

@loyolaxavvierretard :s gayness test:
First you need to pass the twerking test.
Then you need to pass the naked test.
Finally you need to take @loyolaxavvierretard :s cock to pass the bottom test. After that the results will determine whether you are gay or no.
What will he do in the last test?:
He will kiss you softly and stroke your anus to turn you on and relax. He will hold your hands as he inserts into you. And holds you after the deed is done. After that he kisses your neck and slowly strokes your cock to turn you on. Making you slurp on his dick. He will bend you on all fours and take you as if you were his.

 

[loyolaxavvierretard]

@loyolaxavvierretard :s gayness test:
First you need to pass the twerking test.
Then you need to pass the naked test.
Finally you need to take @loyolaxavvierretard :s cock to pass the bottom test. After that the results will determine whether you are gay or no.
What will he do in the last test?:
He will kiss you softly and stroke your anus to turn you on and relax. He will hold your hands as he inserts into you. And holds you after the deed is done. After that he kisses your neck and slowly strokes your cock to turn you on. Making you slurp on his dick. He will bend you on all fours and take you as if you were his.

, This seems familiar

 

[Сигма Бой]

View attachment 3656335

Does the 5 mentions law apply to profile posts?

I don’t think so

 

[rrm_ss2]

That dysfunctional & imperious overlady titled as @highinhibcel spuriously executed an unreasonable 30% warning upon oneself of which engendered Our paschal triduum crucifixion.

As of Thursday, 17. April 2025, Our total warning percentage composes of an exceedingly inflated 80% warning.

That aforementioned Jewess inappropriately banned Ourself for assumedly mass-tagging, which is evidently counterfactual insomuch as the mass-tagging law pertains not until there exist more than one million mentions within one thread. Whereupon that aforementioned sheboon insisted that 28 mentions is mass-tagging, wherefore We hath inferred that it would solely certify as mass-tagging when one is exceeding one million mentions within one thread via educating xir anent the formal definition of the word massive. Thereafter xe closed Our private conversation in ireful ignorance, which is apparent TFB. Therefore myself requests one gender inspection towards that beforenamed pseudomale.

Moreover, @emeraldglass pronounced that if one user mentions more than 5 users within one thread, one is infringing the unformulated 5 mentions rule given by him.

Thereby justifying executing one honorable 30% warning upon xir for unlawfully mentioning 7 users within one post.

Sauce: https://looksmax.org/threads/doutze...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/
Webpage archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20250417...oks-and-modelling-nederlanders-gtfih.1366392/

#investigatehighinhibcel

@TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan

i didnt even know you could be banned for mass tagging people

 

[Healthymaxxer]

 

[Healthymaxxer]

i didnt even know you could be banned for mass tagging people

i have a challenge: mass tag all the mods and admins of .org. NOW!

 

[Сигма Бой]

i didnt even know you could be banned for mass tagging people

1,000,000 is the threshold for mass-tagging. However, the 5 mentions rule hitherto applies, except within profile posts.

 

[rrm_ss2]

1,000,000 is the threshold for mass-tagging. However, the 5 mentions rule hitherto applies, except within profile posts.

tag another mod to ban this mod

 

[Healthymaxxer]

1,000,000 is the threshold for mass-tagging. However, the 5 mentions rule hitherto applies, except within profile posts.

what would happen if i copypasted @ highinhibcel one million times on your profile

 

[Сигма Бой]

tag another mod to ban this mod

@emeraldglass @TechnoBoss @Quncho @Gargantuan

Those are Our 5 mentions. It is your turn, bhai.

 

[Сигма Бой]

what would happen if i copypasted @ highinhibcel one million times on your profile

That.

 

[Healthymaxxer]

That.

i got the 999 999 mentions on my word document, but the org says

 

[2025cel]

Great

 

[Сигма Бой]

i got the 999 999 mentions on my word document, but the org says View attachment 3656385

Oops! We ran into some problems.
Please enter a message with no more than 420 characters.

 

[2025cel]

This is wondrous news, bump.

 

[Healthymaxxer]

Oops! We ran into some problems.
Please enter a message with no more than 420 characters.

no way its only 420 characters

 

[Сигма Бой]

no way its only 420 characters

Share the text, nigger.

 

[Сигма Бой]

This is wondrous news, bump.

That sounds ambiguous.

 

[Healthymaxxer]

Share the text, nigger.

ok, wait, ts makes everything crash

 

[Сигма Бой]

ok, wait, ts makes everything crash

That is improbable for a 420 character text.