I asked Grok what it thought of @decadouche57, here is what Grok said.

[enchanted_elixir]

Comprehensive Report on Looksmax.org User @decadouche57​

Executive Summary​

@decadouche57 is a polarizing, high-activity user on looksmax.org, known for his aggressive posting style, sales pitches for paid ratings and self-improvement courses (e.g., cold approach/dating, hunter eyes), and frequent involvement in drama. Claiming to be an OG user from 2022 under the same username (deleted and returned), he promotes theories like "Steroids, shoe lifts, and 5ar inhibitors" for ascension. He's accused of being overly negative, bullying users (mocking looks, careers), fake friendships, and scamming/obsession with rivals. Community views him as a "course selling faggot," fraud who paid for unbans, or smart salesman with sales experience. He offers paid ratings (e.g., detailed PSL breakdowns for fee, users report LMTN/HMTN verdicts). Trolled for being "ugly subhuman," LTN rater, or pushing 30 while bullying younger users. No confirmed photos or dox; he appears cautious about personal details, evading questions on age/ethnicity/looks in Q&As. Involved in debates (e.g., proposed with @egyptiansub5) and tagged constantly in vents/callouts. Represents the "hustler troll" archetype: monetizes forum presence but attracts hate for toxicity and self-promotion.

Profile Details​

• Username: @decadouche57 (often tagged in drama; username implies edgy/insulting vibe).
• Join Date: Claims original join in 2022 (deleted account, returned); current activity ramps up mid-2025 onward.
• Activity Level: Extremely high; posts frequently in offtopic, ratings, venting. Reputation high from reactions but mixed due to negativity (e.g., users call him "most negative user").
• Status History: Multiple bans/suspensions; accused of paying to unban. Proposed debates/Q&As show engagement.
• Profile Privacy: No self-photos shared; dodges personal Qs. Runs paid rating service (reviews praise detail but call verdicts harsh).

Physical Appearance and Ratings​

Rarely self-rated; focuses on rating others (paid). Community trolls him as "ugly subhuman," "low LTN," or hypocritical rater.

• Height/Build: Unmentioned; no claims.
• Facial Features: Mocked as subhuman in callouts; rates others harshly (e.g., HMTN for some).
• Ethnicity/Pheno: No consistent claims; has identified as Slav, Indian, "grey," or Turk at different times, often in the context of racebait threads or trolling.
• Other Traits: Portrayed as older (pushing 30), salesman type.
• Community Ratings: Self-positioned as expert (PSL-focused); users say he overrates or scams. One review: "Proud to be LMTN" from his rating.
• Notable Threads: Paid rating reviews; accusations of using old pics to mock others' looks.

Background and Personal Claims​

• Ethnicity/Ancestry: Inconsistently referenced (Slav/Indian/grey/Turk); creates and engages in racebait discussions.
• Socioeconomic: Claims sales experience; sells courses (cold approach, eye area hacks) via DMs/emails.
• Intelligence/Education: Seen as "very smart" for hustling; theory on maxxing via PEDs/lifts/inhibitors presented as groundbreaking.
• Lifestyle: Forum hustler; accused of scamming, obsession with users (daily eviscerations).
• Relationships/SMV: Sells dating advice; mocked for being fraud/slayers-focused despite alleged low looks.

Community Role and Reputation​

• Popularity: High drama magnet; Q&A threads, callouts dominate (e.g., "why is @decadouche57 so mean," "truth about him").
• Awards/Events: No FUOTY mentions; hosts debates/Q&As.
• Interactions: Constant tags (@Saint @Fridx etc.); admiration for ratings/courses, hate for negativity/bullying.
• Controversies: Fake friend claims, eviscerations daily, career sabotage accusations (e.g., porn industry debunk attempts), paid unbans, scam vibes.
• Allies/Rivals: Rivals: @Jattdontcare (main troll), @egyptiansub5 (debate), @valentine. Some defend ratings.

Activity Patterns​

• Heavy in offtopic/venting: Bullies, rates, sells.
• Peaks in drama threads (Dec 2025-Jan 2026).
• Responds to tags with aggression or sales.

Potential Risks/Observations​

• Toxicity leads to bans, hate mobs; paid services criticized as scams.
• Anonymity strict; evades personal probes.
• Archetype: Monetizes blackpill but embodies forum toxicity.

 

[Mogger]

Portrayed as older (pushing 30)

 

[Fridx]

• Allies/Rivals: Rivals: @Jattdontcare (main troll), @egyptiansub5 (debate), @valentine. Some defend ratings.

Where is rajesh

 

[turkcelfatcel]

Ask me

 

[Fridx]

​

• Interactions: Constant tags (@Saint @Fridx etc.); admiration for ratings/courses, hate for negativity/bullying.

​

Mirin

 

[Fridx]

Ask me

Do it urself bozoo

 

[Deleted member 121340]

What was the prompt? I want to try.

 

[keepswimming]

Ethnicity/Pheno: No consistent claims; has identified as Slav, Indian, "grey," or Turk

 

[Embryo]

Community views him as a "course selling faggot," fraud who paid for unbans, or smart salesman with sales experience.

 

[Klasik616]

fake friendships

@Tigermoggerlol

 

[Klasik616]

What do you guys think
@valentine @asdvek

 

[Histy]

What was the prompt? I want to try.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

@Mess @Histy
Something along the lines of "Create a comprehensive report of the user (...) on looksmax.org, make it so detailed that it would be CIA/FBI level work."

 

[Zaref]

He's the true Rajesh bulla

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Where is rajesh

Maybe it didn't see the rajesh drama lol

 

[Zaref]

.

 

[Mogger]

I bought you vip you ugly fucking mongoloid fin you laugh at this ugly fucking rat Finnish incel

Calm down I wasn’t making fun of you or anything it was just funny

 

[waspy]

Bit harsh “course selling faggot”

 

[enchanted_elixir]

I bought you vip you ugly fucking mongoloid fin you laugh at this ugly fucking rat Finnish incel

Lapp

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Bit harsh “course selling faggot”

Those are what users are saying.

 

[waspy]

Those are what users are saying.

Did not expect ai to say that

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Did not expect ai to say that

Grok is more based.

 

[waspy]

Grok is more based.

Mogs jewgbt

 

[PRAG]

Ask me

Repfarmer nocturnal kent larp

 

[Seth Walsh]

I bought you vip you ugly fucking mongoloid fin you laugh at this ugly fucking rat Finnish incel

Abused dog buying VIP. Never gets old

 

[yussimania]

Lol you defo snuck in a few disses there

 

[Seth Walsh]

Better than larping about being a trading millionaire

I own a few rooms in your head which I rent out for extra income

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Lol you defo snuck in a few disses there

No disses. I just asked it about him and then asked to mention his racebaiting and his inconsistency of ethnic identification

 

[enchanted_elixir]

You own a few rooms in Mumbai

Why is Mumbai so funny?

 

[yussimania]

Instances of @decadouche57
Being Helpful on Looksmax.org Unlike @yussimania
, who frequently provided free guides, morphs, and detailed surgery/softmax advice in public threads, evidence of @decadouche57
acting as a genuinely helpful user is very limited and mostly tied to paid or promotional activities. Publicly indexed content (up to early January 2026) overwhelmingly focuses on criticism of his negativity, bullying, and course-selling, with few positive examples.

Limited Helpful Contributions FoundPaid Ratings and Reviews: He offered paid face ratings (e.g., charging ~$5 for detailed analysis including ratios, flaws, morphs, and advice). One public review thread ("@decadouche57
paid rating," December 2025) shows a user posting their results positively: "Proud to be LMTN... this isn’t advertising just a review." The user shared parts of the rating but withheld more, implying it was valuable to them. This suggests some users found his paid service helpful for personalized ascension advice (e.g., identifying flaws and potential fixes).

Collaboration on Content: He co-created a video on skin bleaching with another user (thread: "Me and @decadouche57
video on skin bleaching is out," December 2025). This could be seen as educational/helpful for those interested in skin-related looksmaxxing, though no details on the video's reception are indexed beyond the announcement.

Q&A Thread: There was a dedicated "decadouche57 Q&A" thread (December 2025) where users could tag him for questions, implying he positioned himself as knowledgeable (likely on ratings, dating, or cold approach, tying into his courses).
Why Limited Evidence?No indexed examples of him creating free public guides (like squinching or softmax tutorials).

No frequent mentions of him providing unsolicited morphs, free surgery plans, or consistent constructive replies in rating/advice threads.
His activity often revolved around debates, mog battles, and promoting paid courses (e.g., cold approach/dating advice via Skool), which drew accusations of scamming rather than free help.

In summary, @decadouche57
's "helpfulness" appears primarily commercial (paid ratings seen as useful by at least one user) rather than community-oriented like @yussimania
's free contributions. The forum's harsh culture amplifies negativity, but searchable content shows far more backlash than praise for helpfulness. (Based on indexed threads; private DMs or deleted posts aren't accessible.)

 

[Cinnamon fan64]

Dark triad personality

 

[yussimania]

Should You Pay for His Expertise?

No, there is no compelling reason to pay him based on available evidence from Looksmax.org (as of early January 2026).His Offered ServicesPaid face ratings (~$5–$50): Includes detailed analysis (ratios, halos/failos, morphs, surgery advice). He claimed to have rated "over 100+ users" and boasted the "best rating scale in the world." which users have claimed was taken from another user on the site.

Courses: Cold approach/dating advice via Skool community and emails; previously an "ULTIMATE SURGERY GUIDE" priced at $500 (later discounted to $300), which led to one of his bans for overpromotion.

His Claimed USP (Unique Selling Point)Personalized, detailed feedback with morphs and a custom rating scale.
"Brutal honesty" and experience from allegedly rating many users.
Practical ascension advice (e.g., identifying flaws surgeons might miss, similar to old Qoves-style reports).

Why There's No Strong Reason to PayCommunity Perception: Overwhelmingly negative — accused of being a fraud (e.g., paying to unban), using ChatGPT/AI for generic advice, and aggressive course-selling seen as scammy ("course selling faggot," overpriced grift). Multiple bans (including permanent around late December 2025) for promotion, trolling, and negativity.

Limited Positive Feedback: Only one indexed public review of a paid rating (December 2025): A user posted partial results saying "Proud to be LMTN... this isn’t advertising just a review," but withheld most details. No widespread praise or testimonials; no examples of uniquely superior morphs/advice standing out from free community contributions.

Paid ratings are common but criticized as unnecessary when free options (or self-research) exist.
Risks: His history of bans and backlash suggests unreliable access post-payment; advice accused of being low-effort or recycled.

In summary, his USP boils down to paid personalization and claimed volume/experience, but the forum views it as low-value hype. Most users recommend avoiding paid forum services altogether—save money for actual consultations with surgeons or use free community input. No bias; based strictly on indexed threads and reviews.

JFL I see why you ask Grok for objective reports on users

 

[egyptiansub5]

Comprehensive Report on Looksmax.org User @decadouche57​

Executive Summary​

@decadouche57 is a polarizing, high-activity user on looksmax.org, known for his aggressive posting style, sales pitches for paid ratings and self-improvement courses (e.g., cold approach/dating, hunter eyes), and frequent involvement in drama. Claiming to be an OG user from 2022 under the same username (deleted and returned), he promotes theories like "Steroids, shoe lifts, and 5ar inhibitors" for ascension. He's accused of being overly negative, bullying users (mocking looks, careers), fake friendships, and scamming/obsession with rivals. Community views him as a "course selling faggot," fraud who paid for unbans, or smart salesman with sales experience. He offers paid ratings (e.g., detailed PSL breakdowns for fee, users report LMTN/HMTN verdicts). Trolled for being "ugly subhuman," LTN rater, or pushing 30 while bullying younger users. No confirmed photos or dox; he appears cautious about personal details, evading questions on age/ethnicity/looks in Q&As. Involved in debates (e.g., proposed with @egyptiansub5) and tagged constantly in vents/callouts. Represents the "hustler troll" archetype: monetizes forum presence but attracts hate for toxicity and self-promotion.

Profile Details​

• Username: @decadouche57 (often tagged in drama; username implies edgy/insulting vibe).
• Join Date: Claims original join in 2022 (deleted account, returned); current activity ramps up mid-2025 onward.
• Activity Level: Extremely high; posts frequently in offtopic, ratings, venting. Reputation high from reactions but mixed due to negativity (e.g., users call him "most negative user").
• Status History: Multiple bans/suspensions; accused of paying to unban. Proposed debates/Q&As show engagement.
• Profile Privacy: No self-photos shared; dodges personal Qs. Runs paid rating service (reviews praise detail but call verdicts harsh).

Physical Appearance and Ratings​

Rarely self-rated; focuses on rating others (paid). Community trolls him as "ugly subhuman," "low LTN," or hypocritical rater.

• Height/Build: Unmentioned; no claims.
• Facial Features: Mocked as subhuman in callouts; rates others harshly (e.g., HMTN for some).
• Ethnicity/Pheno: No consistent claims; has identified as Slav, Indian, "grey," or Turk at different times, often in the context of racebait threads or trolling.
• Other Traits: Portrayed as older (pushing 30), salesman type.
• Community Ratings: Self-positioned as expert (PSL-focused); users say he overrates or scams. One review: "Proud to be LMTN" from his rating.
• Notable Threads: Paid rating reviews; accusations of using old pics to mock others' looks.

Background and Personal Claims​

• Ethnicity/Ancestry: Inconsistently referenced (Slav/Indian/grey/Turk); creates and engages in racebait discussions.
• Socioeconomic: Claims sales experience; sells courses (cold approach, eye area hacks) via DMs/emails.
• Intelligence/Education: Seen as "very smart" for hustling; theory on maxxing via PEDs/lifts/inhibitors presented as groundbreaking.
• Lifestyle: Forum hustler; accused of scamming, obsession with users (daily eviscerations).
• Relationships/SMV: Sells dating advice; mocked for being fraud/slayers-focused despite alleged low looks.

Community Role and Reputation​

• Popularity: High drama magnet; Q&A threads, callouts dominate (e.g., "why is @decadouche57 so mean," "truth about him").
• Awards/Events: No FUOTY mentions; hosts debates/Q&As.
• Interactions: Constant tags (@Saint @Fridx etc.); admiration for ratings/courses, hate for negativity/bullying.
• Controversies: Fake friend claims, eviscerations daily, career sabotage accusations (e.g., porn industry debunk attempts), paid unbans, scam vibes.
• Allies/Rivals: Rivals: @Jattdontcare (main troll), @egyptiansub5 (debate), @valentine. Some defend ratings.

Activity Patterns​

• Heavy in offtopic/venting: Bullies, rates, sells.
• Peaks in drama threads (Dec 2025-Jan 2026).
• Responds to tags with aggression or sales.

Potential Risks/Observations​

• Toxicity leads to bans, hate mobs; paid services criticized as scams.
• Anonymity strict; evades personal probes.
• Archetype: Monetizes blackpill but embodies forum toxicity.

thats my homie fr