I believe that features matter more than ratios and here's why.

nihilist l-mtn

nihilist l-mtn

Iron
Joined
Oct 26, 2025
Posts
142
Reputation
76
Check out this morph I made of thecel,I only changed the features and hair while keeping their ratios(The eyes look more open because of the eyelashes)

1000357583
1000357584

I'd like to know what you guys think and if I'm wrong about any point
 
  • +1
Reactions: acm and 2s2f
of course
 
  • +1
Reactions: nihilist l-mtn
I think "features" is a bit vague, isn't it? Like giving him a beard will change his ratios and angles around his jaw slightly. And also even with the changes you made he's still not particularly attractive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: brootaldude, nihilist l-mtn and OldSpice
features are more important than ratios but if you have a long philtrum then it really does mess you up.
 
I agree
 
  • +1
Reactions: nihilist l-mtn
what matters most is a developed wide face with prominent cheekbones, good looking eyes and a good jawline
 
  • +1
Reactions: nihilist l-mtn
I think "features" is a bit vague, isn't it? Like giving him a beard will change his ratios and angles around his jaw slightly. And also even with the changes you made he's still not particularly attractive.
I think it can be considered gl irl, it will have quite a lot of appeal
 
  • +1
Reactions: o_Owtf
what matters most is a developed wide face with prominent cheekbones, good looking eyes and a good jawline
one of them could non exist to certain point if others are THAT good*
 
I think "features" is a bit vague, isn't it? Like giving him a beard will change his ratios and angles around his jaw slightly. And also even with the changes you made he's still not particularly attractive.
I think that just because we are giving a TEEN, CHINEESE teen a beard, it looks more weird than "attarcative", thats why, I think such morph should be done on a Caucasian in their low 20s, not on kids(I`m sure his bones will somewhat develop naturally and we are dropping beards on kids ofc that will look not that attaractive
 
Interesting premise, You should redo this morph to make it more realistic so we can genuinely compare.
 
one of them could non exist to certain point if others are THAT good*
If humans still ate their natural, species appropriate food, everyone would look good more or less, the underdeveloped faces today are a result of the junk that humans are being fed
 
If humans still ate their natural, species appropriate food, everyone would look good more or less, the underdeveloped faces today are a result of the junk that humans are being fed
Big contributor also is sedentary lifechoices and less sports in life for many of ppl
 
If humans still ate their natural, species appropriate food, everyone would look good more or less, the underdeveloped faces today are a result of the junk that humans are being fed
IMG 5015
 
  • JFL
Reactions: nihilist l-mtn
I think it can be considered gl irl, it will have quite a lot of appeal
Maybe you could try also making a morph with better/ideal ratios but the same hair/skin etc? Then just compare that edit to the one you've posted here too see what makes the biggest difference.
 

Similar threads

MediterraneanMoid
Replies
9
Views
125
MediterraneanMoid
MediterraneanMoid
93symmetrymog
Replies
14
Views
190
neo88
N
jimmymogs
Replies
12
Views
160
jimmymogs
jimmymogs
neuro.fb
Replies
4
Views
116
desperatesub5
desperatesub5

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top