I can objectively prove the existence of God

provide evidence for the premise. also what law of logic have i disregarded in my argument? did i commit any fallacies, if yes name them
What religion are you before i debate
 
they arenโ€™t though. you are just saying they are, but not giving a reason, or an argument for why that is the case
your human brain interface (what you perceive as reality) is your reality so all attempts at conceptualising base layer ontological reality (god) or quite literally any reality besides your own, are completely self contradictory ie human constructs

the input is irrational/incomplete therefore no rational output or assertions about the truth can be made
 
Last edited:
You haven't given an argument as to why it's not a human construct
Only idiots argue about this stuff. It would be like arguing about whether there are invisible people around us
1. no defeaters presented and appears to be the case
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JasGews69x and optimisticzoomer
That is a metaphysical assumption. You are asserting not demonstrating the premise. Platonism can very well explain the nature of logic without a higher entity to produce it
I 100% agree. if you are a platonist i would simply deconstruct the platonistic paradigm and show its incoherency. are you a platonist?
 
  • +1
Reactions: JasGews69x
I 100% agree. if you are a platonist i would simply deconstruct the platonistic paradigm and show its incoherency. are you a platonist?
No, I am merely stating a view.
 
okay, then do you agree with my metaphysical assumption or not
I would have to read up more on it. Cant say I have read more than intro Phil
 
  • JFL
Reactions: JasGews69x and loyolaxavvierretard
Religious debates in 2025
 
Add me on discord: jongeman__
God is a necessary precondition for a universal truth, universal truths exist, therefore God exists
Your argument is fallible, dm me for further info, I refuse to say it here because I'm also a Muslim.
 
Ontological
BABAHAHAH, so you believe there is an ontological concrete entity called the law of non contradiction floating around in the universe. ad absurdityโ€”> defeater to your position jfl
 
BABAHAHAH, so you believe there is an ontological concrete entity called the law of non contradiction floating around in the universe. ad absurdityโ€”> defeater to your position jfl
ontological just means its part of realitys structure like math isnt floating around but still holds universally
 
Add me on discord: jongeman__
God is a necessary precondition for a universal truth, universal truths exist, therefore God exists
goede middag jongeman.
 
ontological just means its part of realitys structure like math isnt floating around but still holds universally
no, math doesnโ€™t have any ontological grounding. it exists only conceptually
 
im sorry for my ignorance, but 2 things:

1. This only proves the existence of a non-interventionist God. Then why are you muslim?
2. Im gonna assume youre an investor from your pfp. Do you acknowledge the fact that statistics has debunked the posibility of "beating the market", so proving is basically gambling?
 
im sorry for my ignorance, but 2 things:

1. This only proves the existence of a non-interventionist God. Then why are you muslim?
2. Im gonna assume youre an investor from your pfp. Do you acknowledge the fact that statistics has debunked the posibility of "beating the market", so proving is basically gambling?
Yes, the argument is designed to prove a necesary intelect, we would call that God. Also, its partial gambling if you dont know what you are doing
 

Similar threads

Basedman420
Replies
22
Views
187
Bars
Bars
D
2 3 4
Replies
182
Views
2K
bluntmullet
bluntmullet
Changmentum
Replies
3
Views
135
nazareth016
nazareth016
ascensionneeeded
Replies
14
Views
307
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
Changmentum
Replies
20
Views
322
BigJimsWornOutTires
BigJimsWornOutTires

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top