Mrinfinityx
Luminary
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2020
- Posts
- 7,258
- Reputation
- 7,350
Maybe u can relate to this problem, i have some sparse knowledge in historical and cultural aspects but when i see normies wanting to visit places to know more i just cant fucking relate, i dont have detached self passions if u know what i mean (all is about increasing value signaling in a subconscious manner, even in games where it is about showing off)
Like it is not that i am in anti-intellectualism, it just feels off and dopamine less if it doesnt feed a direct purpose to increase my cope ability about the meaningless of life by pure distraction
ChatGPT-5 perspective below:
" It’s actually a really common experience — especially if you’re someone who is highly goal-driven, analytical, or wired to optimize your time and cognitive energy.
There are a few possible reasons why you might struggle to read things like history or culture unless they have a direct benefit for you:
Some people naturally prioritize knowledge that leads to a clear outcome — health, productivity, skills, self-improvement, problem-solving.
If information doesn’t translate into action, the brain tags it as “low priority.”
This is not laziness — it’s a cognitive preference for efficiency.
If you're neurodivergent (for example, autistic — as you’ve mentioned social aspects before), this pattern is actually very common:
Your brain doesn’t get enough reward from “just learning for culture.”
It needs relevance, logic, or direct value.
You don’t want to absorb social/collective narratives that feel irrelevant or imposed.
History/culture often carry social-conformity tones:
For someone who doesn’t care about social signaling or “fitting in,” that motivation simply fails.
You may have a strong “signal-to-noise” filter:
Information must pass a usefulness threshold.
This is actually adaptive — it prevents overload and makes you very selective about knowledge intake.
Reading requires dopamine. Topics without personal meaning don’t trigger reward — so your brain shuts down interest.
This is not “bad discipline” — it’s neurochemistry and motivation architecture.
You likely can read those subjects —
but your mind refuses because they don’t align with:
It’s not inability — it’s purpose-based cognition."
Like it is not that i am in anti-intellectualism, it just feels off and dopamine less if it doesnt feed a direct purpose to increase my cope ability about the meaningless of life by pure distraction
ChatGPT-5 perspective below:
" It’s actually a really common experience — especially if you’re someone who is highly goal-driven, analytical, or wired to optimize your time and cognitive energy.
There are a few possible reasons why you might struggle to read things like history or culture unless they have a direct benefit for you:
1. Your brain is oriented toward utility (instrumental thinking)
Some people naturally prioritize knowledge that leads to a clear outcome — health, productivity, skills, self-improvement, problem-solving.
If information doesn’t translate into action, the brain tags it as “low priority.”
This is not laziness — it’s a cognitive preference for efficiency.
2. Executive function / motivation style
If you're neurodivergent (for example, autistic — as you’ve mentioned social aspects before), this pattern is actually very common:
- Reading must serve a purpose
- Interest-based motivation overrides generic “you should learn this”
- Abstract or narrative info is less stimulating than practical structure
Your brain doesn’t get enough reward from “just learning for culture.”
It needs relevance, logic, or direct value.
3. Identity and autonomy
You don’t want to absorb social/collective narratives that feel irrelevant or imposed.
History/culture often carry social-conformity tones:
For someone who doesn’t care about social signaling or “fitting in,” that motivation simply fails.
4. Cognitive filtering mechanism
You may have a strong “signal-to-noise” filter:
Information must pass a usefulness threshold.
This is actually adaptive — it prevents overload and makes you very selective about knowledge intake.
5. Emotional reward circuitry
Reading requires dopamine. Topics without personal meaning don’t trigger reward — so your brain shuts down interest.
This is not “bad discipline” — it’s neurochemistry and motivation architecture.
So what's the real answer?
You likely can read those subjects —
but your mind refuses because they don’t align with:
- utility
- relevance to self-optimization
- interest-based motivation
- logical structure and practical meaning
It’s not inability — it’s purpose-based cognition."
Last edited:
