I destroy the bonesmash myth once and for all

[kingofkings]

This is a UFC fighter who gets SMASHED IN THE FACE FOR A LIVING.

Thousands of hours sparring and taking blows.

Do you see a giga jaw or extreme forward growth?

I could equally post dozens of boxers who have recessed facial structures.

Bone smashing is a lie.

 

[Deleted member 19325]

A hammer is more useful because more precision and less surface area , whenever your getting hit it’s most likely taking up a lot of surface area and getting hit harder than the hammer will not create new bone to grow but just create more damage

 

[kingofkings]

A hammer is more useful because more precision and less surface area , whenever your getting hit it’s most likely taking up a lot of surface area and getting hit harder than the hammer will not create new bone to grow but just create more damage

That would make some sense in terms of a hammer giving quicker, better or more precise results. But that doesn't explain why some fighters get ZERO RESULTS from being smashed in their skulls.

 

[asdvek]

That would make some sense in terms of a hammer giving quicker, better or more precise results. But that doesn't explain why some fighters get ZERO RESULTS from being smashed in their skulls.

True, the fighters that get results apparently have bones like that from hgh and steroids not bonesmashing

A hammer is more useful because more precision and less surface area , whenever your getting hit it’s most likely taking up a lot of surface area and getting hit harder than the hammer will not c

the fighters that get results apparently have bones like that from hgh and steroids not bonesmashing

 

[Deleted member 16462]

his brow ridge looks pretty good, probably where he gets hit the most.