D
Deleted member 8706
A la orden del señor
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2020
- Posts
- 5,033
- Reputation
- 9,840
i mean dude, if you woke up today as a 6.5psl chad ( same SMV as a deccent woman ) you wouldnt date 3psl women jfl
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
cope just listen to this overnight and your good to goJUST WAKE UP ONE DAY AS CHAD THEORY
That's called eugenics and it ruins societies. Also any "natural" argument is automatically a logical fallacy. And in order to "secure the possible genetics" for the future of humanity, hypergamy would be based off IQ and conscientiousness. Every human achievement was made by an exceptional high IQ male and none of them were chads save for conquerors.Hypergamy in general is natural and should be seen as good for the future of humanity in order to secure the
best possible genetics.Modern feminist driven hyergamy however,is quite disastrous and is proving to be so each
day.In this regard,I can at least understand why most Incels and Blackpillers complain about it.
My argument was meant to argue against modern Hypergamy,where men's looks are playing the biggest decidingThat's called eugenics and it ruins societies. Also any "natural" argument is automatically a logical fallacy. And in order to "secure the possible genetics" for the future of humanity, hypergamy would be based off IQ and conscientiousness. Every human achievement was made by an exceptional high IQ male and none of them were chads save for conquerors.
I think we're talking about two different things jflMy argument was meant to argue against modern Hypergamy,where men's looks are playing the biggest deciding
factor in whether or not he gets to procreate.Women now are out-earning men in case you've forgotten.What other
incentive then is there for them to chose a man other than his looks.Women dgaf about "muh IQ"
We are still programmed as if we are caveman looking for best possible genetics for survival in the wildThat's called eugenics and it ruins societies. Also any "natural" argument is automatically a logical fallacy. And in order to "secure the possible genetics" for the future of humanity, hypergamy would be based off IQ and conscientiousness. Every human achievement was made by an exceptional high IQ male and none of them were chads save for conquerors.
yes I would?i mean dude, if you woke up today as a 6.5psl chad ( same SMV as a deccent woman ) you wouldnt date 3psl women jfl