i feel like im running out of time

prhmq

prhmq

Banned
Joined
Apr 17, 2025
Posts
827
Reputation
874
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
 
oof

already too late BUDDY BOYOOOOOOOOOOO

should have blasted ai and hgh at 14
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: MaracasMogs, ikramy, Aryan Incel and 3 others
Start saving money.
^^

oof

already too late BUDDY BOYOOOOOOOOOOO

should have blasted ai and hgh at 14
^^

peptides arent cope
they are for anything bone related

so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
just start saving for surgery, 16.5 is way too late for anything to change bone-wise
 
  • +1
Reactions: BaranPSL and User28823
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
wageslave for surgery
 
  • +1
Reactions: prhmq
just start saving for surgery, 16.5 is way too late for anything to change bone-wise
Not for some specific bones like Browridge tho, but %90 of bone development is gone obv and peptides etc won't do anything; hope he is geomaxxed and can moneymaxx jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi and Orka
if u want to take the risk then go for it, i put on a post earlier about cjc-1295 and i dont know if its cope but it seems pretty good, try that first, it doesnt have too many risks
 
Peptides will obviously turn you into chad within 6 months
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MaracasMogs, Frogooboi and ikramy
if u want to take the risk then go for it, i put on a post earlier about cjc-1295 and i dont know if its cope but it seems pretty good, try that first, it doesnt have too many risks
@the next o'pry 's avi

holy goated :owo:
 
  • +1
Reactions: the next o'pry
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
hurry up and take the peptides before its over :33333
 
Prove it then

Height gain [mean (SE)] at 24 months was: AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006, analysis of covariance). Height SDS was: AI, −1.73 (0.12); GH, −1.43 (0.14); AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) (P < .0012). Those treated through 36 months grew more. Regardless of treatment duration, height SDS at near-final height [n = 71; age, 17.4 (0.2) years; bone age, 15.3 (0.1) years; height achieved, ∼97.6%] was: AI, −1.4 (0.1); GH, −1.4 (0.2); AI/GH, −1.0 (0.1) (P = .06). Absolute height change was: AI, +18.2 (1.6) cm; GH, +20.6 (1.5) cm; AI/GH, +22.5 (1.4) cm (P = .01) (expected height gain at −2.0 height SDS, +13.0 cm). AI/GH had higher fat free mass accrual. Measures of bone health, safety labs, and adverse events were similar in all groups. Letrozole caused higher T and lower estradiol than anastrozole.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ikramy

Height gain [mean (SE)] at 24 months was: AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006, analysis of covariance). Height SDS was: AI, −1.73 (0.12); GH, −1.43 (0.14); AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) (P < .0012). Those treated through 36 months grew more. Regardless of treatment duration, height SDS at near-final height [n = 71; age, 17.4 (0.2) years; bone age, 15.3 (0.1) years; height achieved, ∼97.6%] was: AI, −1.4 (0.1); GH, −1.4 (0.2); AI/GH, −1.0 (0.1) (P = .06). Absolute height change was: AI, +18.2 (1.6) cm; GH, +20.6 (1.5) cm; AI/GH, +22.5 (1.4) cm (P = .01) (expected height gain at −2.0 height SDS, +13.0 cm). AI/GH had higher fat free mass accrual. Measures of bone health, safety labs, and adverse events were similar in all groups. Letrozole caused higher T and lower estradiol than anastrozole.
The boys in these trials had a specific condition while having the genes to allow them to grow what they did was to make them reach their potential adult height cause they had a condition, normal 14 yo with let’s say 170cm final adult height genetics won’t have the same results maybe he would be 172 cm which is barely anything.
 
The boys in these trials had a specific condition while having the genes to allow them to grow what they did was to make them reach their potential adult height cause they had a condition, normal 14 yo with let’s say 170cm final adult height genetics won’t have the same results maybe he would be 172 cm which is barely anything.
the only people not growing from hgh + ai are those with polymorphisms affecting their igf-1 receptors
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ikramy

Similar threads

Y
Replies
11
Views
261
iblamemycuriousity
iblamemycuriousity
S
Replies
51
Views
622
emeraldglass
emeraldglass
S
Replies
0
Views
142
suub2incel
S
needlemax
Replies
4
Views
359
Brian Weber
Brian Weber

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top