i feel like im running out of time

D

Deleted member 142348

Platinum
Joined
Apr 17, 2025
Posts
1,006
Reputation
1,105
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
 
oof

already too late BUDDY BOYOOOOOOOOOOO

should have blasted ai and hgh at 14
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: MaracasMogs, Deleted member 133415, Aryan Incel and 3 others
Start saving money.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 142348 and Orka
Start saving money.
^^

oof

already too late BUDDY BOYOOOOOOOOOOO

should have blasted ai and hgh at 14
^^

peptides arent cope
they are for anything bone related

so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
just start saving for surgery, 16.5 is way too late for anything to change bone-wise
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 229496 and User28823
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
wageslave for surgery
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 142348
just start saving for surgery, 16.5 is way too late for anything to change bone-wise
Not for some specific bones like Browridge tho, but %90 of bone development is gone obv and peptides etc won't do anything; hope he is geomaxxed and can moneymaxx jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi and Orka
if u want to take the risk then go for it, i put on a post earlier about cjc-1295 and i dont know if its cope but it seems pretty good, try that first, it doesnt have too many risks
 
Peptides will obviously turn you into chad within 6 months
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MaracasMogs, Frogooboi and Deleted member 133415
if u want to take the risk then go for it, i put on a post earlier about cjc-1295 and i dont know if its cope but it seems pretty good, try that first, it doesnt have too many risks
@the next o'pry 's avi

holy goated :owo:
 
  • +1
Reactions: the next o'pry
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
hurry up and take the peptides before its over :33333
 
Prove it then

Height gain [mean (SE)] at 24 months was: AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006, analysis of covariance). Height SDS was: AI, −1.73 (0.12); GH, −1.43 (0.14); AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) (P < .0012). Those treated through 36 months grew more. Regardless of treatment duration, height SDS at near-final height [n = 71; age, 17.4 (0.2) years; bone age, 15.3 (0.1) years; height achieved, ∼97.6%] was: AI, −1.4 (0.1); GH, −1.4 (0.2); AI/GH, −1.0 (0.1) (P = .06). Absolute height change was: AI, +18.2 (1.6) cm; GH, +20.6 (1.5) cm; AI/GH, +22.5 (1.4) cm (P = .01) (expected height gain at −2.0 height SDS, +13.0 cm). AI/GH had higher fat free mass accrual. Measures of bone health, safety labs, and adverse events were similar in all groups. Letrozole caused higher T and lower estradiol than anastrozole.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 133415

Height gain [mean (SE)] at 24 months was: AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006, analysis of covariance). Height SDS was: AI, −1.73 (0.12); GH, −1.43 (0.14); AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) (P < .0012). Those treated through 36 months grew more. Regardless of treatment duration, height SDS at near-final height [n = 71; age, 17.4 (0.2) years; bone age, 15.3 (0.1) years; height achieved, ∼97.6%] was: AI, −1.4 (0.1); GH, −1.4 (0.2); AI/GH, −1.0 (0.1) (P = .06). Absolute height change was: AI, +18.2 (1.6) cm; GH, +20.6 (1.5) cm; AI/GH, +22.5 (1.4) cm (P = .01) (expected height gain at −2.0 height SDS, +13.0 cm). AI/GH had higher fat free mass accrual. Measures of bone health, safety labs, and adverse events were similar in all groups. Letrozole caused higher T and lower estradiol than anastrozole.
The boys in these trials had a specific condition while having the genes to allow them to grow what they did was to make them reach their potential adult height cause they had a condition, normal 14 yo with let’s say 170cm final adult height genetics won’t have the same results maybe he would be 172 cm which is barely anything.
 
The boys in these trials had a specific condition while having the genes to allow them to grow what they did was to make them reach their potential adult height cause they had a condition, normal 14 yo with let’s say 170cm final adult height genetics won’t have the same results maybe he would be 172 cm which is barely anything.
the only people not growing from hgh + ai are those with polymorphisms affecting their igf-1 receptors
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 133415

Similar threads

lilcrodyshe
Replies
21
Views
58
lilcrodyshe
lilcrodyshe
09075865idk
Replies
3
Views
34
nature
nature
Flare1753
Replies
6
Views
39
nwed
nwed
bddcoper
Replies
4
Views
77
infrainfra
infrainfra
zekeyzee
Replies
3
Views
46
zekeyzee
zekeyzee

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top