i feel like im running out of time

prhmq

prhmq

Gold
Joined
Apr 17, 2025
Posts
958
Reputation
1,019
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
 
Orka

Orka

Hydreigon
Joined
Sep 8, 2024
Posts
11,049
Reputation
35,972
Start saving money.
^^

oof

already too late BUDDY BOYOOOOOOOOOOO

should have blasted ai and hgh at 14
^^

peptides arent cope
they are for anything bone related

so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
just start saving for surgery, 16.5 is way too late for anything to change bone-wise
 
valentine

valentine

-
Joined
Sep 8, 2024
Posts
27,578
Reputation
49,733
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
wageslave for surgery
 
D

Deleted member 229496

Silver
Joined
Sep 16, 2025
Posts
697
Reputation
787
just start saving for surgery, 16.5 is way too late for anything to change bone-wise
Not for some specific bones like Browridge tho, but %90 of bone development is gone obv and peptides etc won't do anything; hope he is geomaxxed and can moneymaxx jfl
 
Vascul

Vascul

Bronze
Joined
Oct 16, 2025
Posts
271
Reputation
238
if u want to take the risk then go for it, i put on a post earlier about cjc-1295 and i dont know if its cope but it seems pretty good, try that first, it doesnt have too many risks
 
IdkManav_

IdkManav_

Iron
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Posts
58
Reputation
33
so i am 16 and a half, and ive known about bp for like 2 or so years, but ive never pulled the trigger and done anything serious, only softmaxxes, which have helped a little bit. Im usually rated lmtn on here, i lack bonemass, and have a sub5 side profile. Do i start taking peptides, or is that cope, and i should just wait til im 18 for surgery?
hurry up and take the peptides before its over :33333
 
User28823

User28823

do not go gentle into that good night
Joined
Aug 7, 2022
Posts
28,021
Reputation
48,610
Prove it then

Height gain [mean (SE)] at 24 months was: AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006, analysis of covariance). Height SDS was: AI, −1.73 (0.12); GH, −1.43 (0.14); AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) (P < .0012). Those treated through 36 months grew more. Regardless of treatment duration, height SDS at near-final height [n = 71; age, 17.4 (0.2) years; bone age, 15.3 (0.1) years; height achieved, ∼97.6%] was: AI, −1.4 (0.1); GH, −1.4 (0.2); AI/GH, −1.0 (0.1) (P = .06). Absolute height change was: AI, +18.2 (1.6) cm; GH, +20.6 (1.5) cm; AI/GH, +22.5 (1.4) cm (P = .01) (expected height gain at −2.0 height SDS, +13.0 cm). AI/GH had higher fat free mass accrual. Measures of bone health, safety labs, and adverse events were similar in all groups. Letrozole caused higher T and lower estradiol than anastrozole.
 
ikramy

ikramy

Luminary
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Posts
5,707
Reputation
9,070

Height gain [mean (SE)] at 24 months was: AI, +14.0 (0.8) cm; GH, +17.1 (0.9) cm; AI/GH, +18.9 (0.8) cm (P < .0006, analysis of covariance). Height SDS was: AI, −1.73 (0.12); GH, −1.43 (0.14); AI/GH, −1.25 (0.12) (P < .0012). Those treated through 36 months grew more. Regardless of treatment duration, height SDS at near-final height [n = 71; age, 17.4 (0.2) years; bone age, 15.3 (0.1) years; height achieved, ∼97.6%] was: AI, −1.4 (0.1); GH, −1.4 (0.2); AI/GH, −1.0 (0.1) (P = .06). Absolute height change was: AI, +18.2 (1.6) cm; GH, +20.6 (1.5) cm; AI/GH, +22.5 (1.4) cm (P = .01) (expected height gain at −2.0 height SDS, +13.0 cm). AI/GH had higher fat free mass accrual. Measures of bone health, safety labs, and adverse events were similar in all groups. Letrozole caused higher T and lower estradiol than anastrozole.
The boys in these trials had a specific condition while having the genes to allow them to grow what they did was to make them reach their potential adult height cause they had a condition, normal 14 yo with let’s say 170cm final adult height genetics won’t have the same results maybe he would be 172 cm which is barely anything.
 
User28823

User28823

do not go gentle into that good night
Joined
Aug 7, 2022
Posts
28,021
Reputation
48,610
The boys in these trials had a specific condition while having the genes to allow them to grow what they did was to make them reach their potential adult height cause they had a condition, normal 14 yo with let’s say 170cm final adult height genetics won’t have the same results maybe he would be 172 cm which is barely anything.
the only people not growing from hgh + ai are those with polymorphisms affecting their igf-1 receptors
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
5
Views
348
Loukas7
Loukas7
Recession.
Replies
12
Views
496
Lisdex
Lisdex
S
Replies
51
Views
1K
emeraldglass
emeraldglass
Y
Replies
11
Views
357
iblamemycuriousity
iblamemycuriousity

Users who are viewing this thread

Top