CFW432
ABOS. MUST. LIVE.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
- Posts
- 14,981
- Reputation
- 21,295
And it simply comes down to this. Most human ancestry (around 80%) is derived from females while a minority (around only 40%) comes from men.
qz.com
If you had to ask yourself, in which gender group could ugly genes have a higher chance of surviving and reproducing in, which one do you think they would?
This actually can be seen in certain modern day populations by haplogroups, such as south asians (indians, Pakistani,bengladeshis). A majority of the Y dna haplogroups (y- dna is paternally derived) found in south asia, are of western Asian, central Asian and eastern European origin (Iranian plateau, the Arabian states, the Caucasus, southern Russia and ukraine), with only a minority Y-dna haplogroups being native. Meanwhile the mtdna haplogroups are of native origin and are a vast majority if not ubiquitous of the south Asian mtdna pool.
This shows that a vast majority of south Asians are west Eurasian paternally mixed with native southern Eurasians maternally.
You might be asking yourselves, how does this make south Asians ugly? Well it's quite simple. The native southern eurasians who first migrated to the Indian subcontinent 60,000+ years ago are also the ancestors of melanesians, papuans, and AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINALS. Everyone knows how ugly asf these populations are lmao. Is it any wonder than, why your average south Asian isn't as good looking compared to your average west Asian, Central Asian, and eastern European?
Once again, ugly asf women, ruining an entire race of people.
The science of sex differences is nothing for feminists to be afraid of
The feminist project has been worn down by the anti-scientific attempt to sweep sex differences under the rug.
qz.com
If you had to ask yourself, in which gender group could ugly genes have a higher chance of surviving and reproducing in, which one do you think they would?
This actually can be seen in certain modern day populations by haplogroups, such as south asians (indians, Pakistani,bengladeshis). A majority of the Y dna haplogroups (y- dna is paternally derived) found in south asia, are of western Asian, central Asian and eastern European origin (Iranian plateau, the Arabian states, the Caucasus, southern Russia and ukraine), with only a minority Y-dna haplogroups being native. Meanwhile the mtdna haplogroups are of native origin and are a vast majority if not ubiquitous of the south Asian mtdna pool.
This shows that a vast majority of south Asians are west Eurasian paternally mixed with native southern Eurasians maternally.
You might be asking yourselves, how does this make south Asians ugly? Well it's quite simple. The native southern eurasians who first migrated to the Indian subcontinent 60,000+ years ago are also the ancestors of melanesians, papuans, and AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINALS. Everyone knows how ugly asf these populations are lmao. Is it any wonder than, why your average south Asian isn't as good looking compared to your average west Asian, Central Asian, and eastern European?
Once again, ugly asf women, ruining an entire race of people.
