I measured my facial ratios

JustCallMeKash

JustCallMeKash

Solstice
Joined
Mar 30, 2024
Posts
2,487
Reputation
2,502

Your measurements vs stated ideals​

Measurement
Yours​
Ideal​
FWHR
1.84
1.80+
Lower face / Full face ratio
0.64
0.62+
Midface ratio
1.08
1.00–1.10
Mouth / Nose ratio
1.33
1.50–1.62
Lower / Upper lip ratio
1.04
1.62
Chin / Philtrum ratio
1.61
2.00–2.25
Bizygomatic / Bigonial width
1.13
1.35
ESR
0.47
0.45–0.47
EME
46.6°
47–50°
Positive canthal tilt (PCT)
8.4°
4–6°
PFL
3
3–3.4
Forehead height
2.75 fingers
3 fingers
Upper facial third
0.76
Equal to other thirds
Middle facial third
0.79
Equal to other thirds
Lower facial third
0.92
Equal to other thirds
1st facial fifth
0.43
Equal to other fifths
2nd facial fifth
0.49
Equal to other fifths
3rd facial fifth (nose)
0.64
Equal to other fifths
4th facial fifth
0.49
Equal to other fifths
5th facial fifth
0.41
Equal to other fifths

I got these numbers from an old 2019 thread all the new ones had way too many shit to measure and im lazy I jst want a general outline of my rating and what specifically on my face needs to be fixed

Btw I dont know how to get my rating out of this the guide didnt mention it I have the measurements now what
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rc3jtree
Btw I dont know how to get my rating out of this the guide
these ratios only tell you abit of your front harmony. A full rating encompasses side harmony via ratios along with full front harmony via ratios + dimorphism + misc + angularity
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustCallMeKash
these ratios only tell you abit of your front harmony. A full rating encompasses side harmony via ratios along with full front harmony via ratios + dimorphism + misc + angularity
My dimo is good, misc is shit I have a better side profile than front so im too lazy to measure it and ppl only care about front regardless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Knight
0.95 is horse tier. 0.98-1.10 is acceptable and above 1.0 is ideal.
0.95 is not horse tier by any means, fuck are you talking about :feelskek: anything even higher than 1.03 would be classed as too compact and a feminised midface, infact for females too a midface of 1.1 would be unideal
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustCallMeKash
Still too long.

Yeah, that’s why 1.0-1.03 is ideal. Long midface is less ideal than compact midface however, and I said the range 0.98-1.10 is acceptable.
0.95-1.03 is the ideal t1 range buddy go check again, 1.1 is deffo not acceptable, only person to still look good with a 1.03+ kind of a midface is barrett and he has everything else
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustCallMeKash
0.95-1.03 is the ideal t1 range buddy go check again, 1.1 is deffo not acceptable, only person to still look good with a 1.03+ kind of a midface is barrett and he has everything else
Ngl amma ascend again n get deep into the facial ratios shit tf yall tlking about t1 like yall r rating shows 😭
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Knight
Ngl amma ascend again n get deep into the facial ratios shit tf yall tlking about t1 like yall r rating shows 😭
t1 is the ideal, it goes from tier 1 to 7, 7 being the worst 0/10
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustCallMeKash
t1 is the ideal, it goes from tier 1 to 7, 7 being the worst 0/10
I have a question how come my lowerthird is the longest part of my facial third even tho my mandible is recessed lile that makes no sense to me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Knight
I have a question how come my lowerthird is the longest part of my facial third even tho my mandible is recessed lile that makes no sense to me
My chin to philtrum ratio is shit too so hpw ia it longer than the other areas
 
  • +1
Reactions: Knight
I have a question how come my lowerthird is the longest part of my facial third even tho my mandible is recessed lile that makes no sense to me
your mandible being recessed slightly doesnt effect your facial height, facial thirds and jaw projection are two completely different things

one is vertical height one is horizontal projection
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustCallMeKash
ugly ass nigga:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Face Shape​


  • Upper Third: 33.4% (30.0-32.0%)
  • Middle Third: 32.7% (31.4-33.4%)
  • Lower Third: 33.9% (33.9-37.0%)
  • TFWHR: 1.36x (1.33-1.37x)
  • Bitemporal Width: 79.1% (86.5-92.5%)
  • FWHR: 1.87x (1.95-2.05x)
  • Midface: 1.01x (0.98-1.02x)
  • Cheekbone Height: 83.3% (83.0%-100.0%)

Eyes​


  • Brow Length: 77.0% (70.0-80.0%)
  • Eyebrow Low Setedness: 92.7% (0.0-50.0%) (mid-set)
  • Eyebrow Tilt: 8.5º (6.5-11.0º)
  • Canthal Tilt: 7.5º (6.0-7.7º)
  • ESR: 46.0% (45.7-46.8%)
  • Eye Aspect: 3.19x (3.00-3.70x)
  • Intercanthal Distance: 1.08x (0.90-1.00x)

Nose​


  • Nose Bridge to Nose Width: 2.01x (2.05-2.15x)
  • Intercanthal-Nasal Width: 0.95x (1.00-1.20x)
  • Ipsilateral Alar Angle: 88.9º (86.5-92.5º)
  • Deviation of IAA and JFA: 1.2º (0.0-2.5º)

Jaw​


  • Jaw Frontal Angle: 87.7º (86.5-92.5º)
  • Jaw Slope: 145.9º (140.0-142.5º)
  • Bigonial Width: 85.4% (87.5-91.5%)
  • Chin to Philtrum: 2.54x (2.10-2.50x)
  • Lower Third Proportion: 33.1% (31.0-33.5%)

Mouth​


  • Interpupillary-Mouth Width: 0.74x (0.80-0.90x)
  • Mouth to Nose Width: 1.41x (1.40-1.50x)
  • Lower to Upper Lip: 1.50x (1.60-1.90x)

Other​


  • Ear Protrusion: 13.2% (8.0-12.0%)
  • Neck Width: 95.2% (92.0-98.0%)
 
your mandible being recessed slightly doesnt effect your facial height, facial thirds and jaw projection are two completely different things

one is vertical height one is horizontal projection
Mmmmmmmmmm so my chin to philtrum can increase dramitcally if I project my chin forqard without it changing my lower third height?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Knight
Mmmmmmmmmm so my chin to philtrum can increase dramitcally if I project my chin forqard without it changing my lower third height?
brotha :ICANT: what are you smoking, chin to philtrum ratio is taken from the front so its based on your face height, you projecting your chin forward changes nothing when it comes to that ratio
 
  • +1
Reactions: JustCallMeKash
brotha :ICANT: what are you smoking, chin to philtrum ratio is taken from the front so its based on your face height, you projecting your chin forward changes nothing when it comes to that ratio
What if i smash tf out of my chin from underneath
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Knight
@Rc3jtree just gonna leave it at this, ideal range for mfr is 0.95-1.03 yes the range can exceed this but it will reduce in tiers, the above stated range i mentioned is T1
 
brotha :ICANT: what are you smoking, chin to philtrum ratio is taken from the front so its based on your face height, you projecting your chin forward changes nothing when it comes to that ratio
So Ive been brutalizing my chin for the past 2 weeks for nothing 🫩
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Knight
@Rc3jtree just gonna leave it at this, ideal range for mfr is 0.95-1.03 yes the range can exceed this but it will reduce in tiers, the above stated range i mentioned is T1
Law
 
  • +1
Reactions: Knight
What if i smash tf out of my chin from underneath
1789361511882

207/97=2.134
im guessing you want a taller chin to philtrum ratio
 
This measurmenrs are false or am i tripping
 
  • +1
Reactions: Knight
Im deadahh running on 1 hour of sleep have work n skl tmr stayed up jst so I could measure my shi feelling like einstein n its fucking wack 😂
 

Similar threads

Raf_slv10
Replies
0
Views
35
Raf_slv10
Raf_slv10
Raf_slv10
Replies
2
Views
49
gayincel_foidkiller
gayincel_foidkiller
ClavGlazer
Replies
5
Views
78
oblivionorb
oblivionorb
truefoidslayerpqoqo
Replies
20
Views
171
Turkic Albanian
Turkic Albanian
Pedro.ascend
Replies
5
Views
70
Pedro.ascend
Pedro.ascend

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top