I notice a current thread titled “Barely legal,” I won’t click it though

BigJimsWornOutTires

BigJimsWornOutTires

Emerald
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Posts
35,086
Reputation
47,318
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Finnishmogger, ghenghis, looks>books and 21 others
Tick tock
 
  • +1
Reactions: Finnishmogger, BigBallsLarry, jrown and 1 other person
@comingthrough
 
  • +1
Reactions: Finnishmogger, jrown, grav and 1 other person
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
Damn:FLUSH:
 
  • +1
Reactions: davidlaidisme67, grav and BigJimsWornOutTires
Yes I’m a teenager and I’ve always thought the “barely legal” allure is very predatorial
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: BigBallsLarry, GoErOnFoids, unstable and 5 others
  • +1
Reactions: davidlaidisme67, BigJimsWornOutTires and Divineincel
Yes. Mature women clear anyways why would you want to look at that bullshit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and Divineincel
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
That’s why we should ban porn here. Too many pedos around here and we certainly don’t want any legal repercussions
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: KidFlash, GoErOnFoids, unstable and 4 others
so right
 
  • +1
Reactions: grav and BigJimsWornOutTires
interesting
Facts

Yes. Mature women clear anyways why would you want to look at that bullshit.
Pedophiles were taught that they are sick. We allowed legislators to give them justification, the same as we did with drunks and drug addicts. "Muh, it's a disease!" Bull fucking shit it is. Arrogance, greed, perversion, and criminal behavior are what it is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jrown and Ascensionsoon
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
Cry about it fag
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: lenvoalt, jrown and Divineincel
It's because I was finding a picture comparison for @shedontluv-U
And here we go. I bet that you had this "excuse" prethought before posting that garbage. That's called premeditated.

That’s why we should ban porn here. Too many pedos around here and we certainly don’t want any legal repercussions
Yet, Reddit, funded by the Democratic Party, distributes the most porn online.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jrown and Divineincel
And here we go. I bet that you had this "excuse" prethought before posting that garbage. That's called premeditated.


Yet, Reddit, funded by the Democratic Party, distributes the most porn online.
Master isn’t backed by anything in contrast to reddit. It’s pretty easy to get this forum down if feds just wanted to do it
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Pedophiles were taught that they are sick. We allowed legislators to give them justification, the same as we did with drunks and drug addicts. "Muh, it's a disease!" Bull fucking shit it is. Arrogance, greed, perversion, and criminal behavior are what it is.
Indeed, leniency has gone too far. For people to even consider justifying pedophilia as a sickness or ailment is gross.

It's a crime, a choice and is far beyond disgusting.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and Divineincel
And here we go. I bet that you had this "excuse" prethought before posting that garbage. That's called premeditated.


Yet, Reddit, funded by the Democratic Party, distributes the most porn online.
Nope time scale litrally aligns up you fucking retard stop speaking like you're smart you nothing in comparison to me you're probably some dumb cunt that thinks you know shit but know nothing trust my knowledge expans way further than your faggy descriptions of onlyfans

Go sip your tea and say mlady even more fag


Screenshot 20260319 155347 Chrome


Talking all philosophical when you're a retard with a gay little rainbow font
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Why do you want this forum shut down, Mr. Comingthrough?
Barely legal Is the allure but the threads are all legal girls if you're gonna go all woke and cry about titles maybe understand that if intelligence agencies
Are watching these threads then if they wanted to shut down this forum they wouldve done it when pedos come on here and post daisy destruction so don't act like you know shit when you know nothing
 
  • Woah
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
You’re un unresponsible moron without zero awareness. You can get us all down by that
I'm not the one that posts daisy's destruction

Screenshot 20260319 160002 Chrome
Screenshot 20260319 160017 Chrome


Cry about it fag
 
great take, almost all the posts I've seen by you have been high iq:AYAYALove: dunno why u hate trannies tho
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: MrMaxwell, astatin, unstable and 1 other person
great take, almost all the posts I've seen by you have been high iq:AYAYALove: dunno why u hate trannies tho
Because trannies are obnoxious, are ruining every fandom they touch and they are mentally ill
 
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and jrown
Because trannies are obnoxious, are ruining every fandom they touch and they are mentally ill
I can agree w the obnoxious part but ion know if they rlly affect most shit. disagree w the mentally ill part too:confused:
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: MrMaxwell, astatin, BigJimsWornOutTires and 1 other person
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and jrown
And here we go. I bet that you had this "excuse" prethought before posting that garbage. That's called premeditated.


Yet, Reddit, funded by the Democratic Party, distributes the most porn online.
Fucking retard

Screenshot 20260319 160205 Chrome
Screenshot 20260319 160355 Chrome
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ToDelirium and Divineincel
Nope time scale litrally aligns up you fucking retard stop speaking like you're smart you nothing in comparison to me you're probably some dumb cunt that thinks you know shit but know nothing trust my knowledge expans way further than your faggy descriptions of onlyfans

Go sip your tea and say mlady even more fag


View attachment 4787531

Talking all philosophical when you're a retard with a gay little rainbow font
Keep my tea out of your fucking mouth!

Speaking of gay little rainbow faggots, talking ill about your organization can lead to expulsion and public humiliation. If those faggots at the LGBT HQ find out that their prize tranny is talking shit about them, they can get pretty nasty, regardless of your Canadian status.

You are a fraud!
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Ascensionsoon, Divineincel and jrown
I can agree w the obnoxious part but ion know if they rlly affect most shit. disagree w the mentally ill part too:confused:
Being transsexual is in the definition a mental illness because you don’t feel who you are in your body. Only in may 2019 WHO stopped classifying it as a mental illness (I wonder why🤔). If you’re trans, better be discreet about it because it is against the rules
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and jrown
niggas be scared ass pedos 😭 borderline
 
  • +1
Reactions: thekidd8 and BigJimsWornOutTires
Keep my tea out of your fucking mouth!

Speaking of gay little rainbow faggots, talking ill about your organization can lead to expulsion and public humiliation. If those faggots at the LGBT HQ find out that their prize tranny is talking shit about them, they can get pretty nasty, regardless of your Canadian status.

You are a fraud!
Yea Canadian I'm english you mong

And I see the sperg come out just because you're fuck ugly Autist dont mean shit I'm a Chad in the making that means I'm smarter than you
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Being transsexual is in the definition a mental illness because you don’t feel who you are in your body. Only in may 2019 WHO stopped classifying it as a mental illness (I wonder why🤔). If you’re trans, better be discreet about it because it is against the rules
I'm not trans:lul:, I could see how u believe its a mental illness tho:unsure: idk I still think they aren't that bad tho cus the few I've met have been nice, if a little annoying and weird.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MrMaxwell, astatin, BigJimsWornOutTires and 1 other person
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
Good choice don't do it or he will ping next time he make a treads like this :feelswah:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
I can agree w the obnoxious part but ion know if they rlly affect most shit. disagree w the mentally ill part too:confused:
Happy Chicago Fire GIF by NBC
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: MrMaxwell and jrown
AI is created and managed by the trannies and faggots, everybody knows this!
You got all these retards here on strings acting like you know more than you do then when questioned with logic you sperge out hope the retards that liked this thread know they're x2 retarded as you
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
I'm not trans:lul:, I could see how u believe its a mental illness tho:unsure: idk I still think they aren't that bad tho cus the few I've met have been nice, if a little annoying and weird.
My main problem is that it shouldn’t be in the mainstream. It can create collective munchausen syndrome
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and jrown
My main problem is that it shouldn’t be in the mainstream. It can create collective munchausen syndrome
yeah I could agree with that. ion rlly think it'd happen though cus of how different family's raise their children and how much effort being trans prolly is (surgery's, dressing up, makeup and shit.)
 
  • +1
Reactions: MrMaxwell, astatin, BigJimsWornOutTires and 1 other person
I'm not trans:lul:, I could see how u believe its a mental illness tho:unsure: idk I still think they aren't that bad tho cus the few I've met have been nice, if a little annoying and weird.
1773936785809


Shouldnt it be the opposite
Absolutely not. The wording is clever and was created by a pedophile who manipulated the system and was later paralyzed for life because he pissed off the wrong motherfucker:


Larry took advantage of teenagers and whored them out for his own greedy pleasure. He was absolutely intelligent; this is why something else had to get involved when that bullet traveled to his chest and was detoured.
 
  • +1
Reactions: jrown
You got all these retards here on strings acting like you know more than you do then when questioned with logic you sperge out hope the retards that liked this thread know they're x2 retarded as you
How dare you accuse me of repfarming this!

Lose Willy Wonka GIF
 
Yea Canadian I'm english you mong

And I see the sperg come out just because you're fuck ugly Autist dont mean shit I'm a Chad in the making that means I'm smarter than you
You're a fat pig who doesn't take daily showers, and you abuse your grandmother because you're also a fat pussy!
 
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
I opened and said that's it's a usless thread for the forum, I'm not a pred I swear
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
niggas be scared to be a real pedophile
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
brother
 
  • Woah
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.

Pornhub and similar networks had been playing this loop for decades. They would use clickbait titles that include "teen" or "teenager". Of course, 18 and 19 meet the definition. But through the perspective of common sense, it's CP.

Banning those pornsites weren’t only about doxxing everybody online, but yanking the ballsacks off of dipshits who thought they were clever.

If you clicked a website or blog that suggested a child uncensored and it showed an adult woman, that’s CP. Because you believed it was a child. And that’s what matters. Your thoughts can be a crime. This happens a lot with pedofishermen posing as children. Doesn’t matter if he is an adult; the predator believed he was a child. And the courts usually view this in the same way.

Therefore, everybody who clicked the mentioned thread is now a suspect for crimes against children.
you made me want to search for it after making this thread
 
  • Woah
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
View attachment 4787622


Absolutely not. The wording is clever and was created by a pedophile who manipulated the system and was later paralyzed for life because he pissed off the wrong motherfucker:


Larry took advantage of teenagers and whored them out for his own greedy pleasure. He was absolutely intelligent; this is why something else had to get involved when that bullet traveled to his chest and was detoured.
bro what does this mean:lul:
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: MrMaxwell, astatin and BigJimsWornOutTires
It's actually pretty crazy that cp bait is practically the biggest category on every platform:unsure:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Barely illegal suggests the person is a day or so over 18. Barely legal suggests the subject is under the age of consent. However, both terms are viewed as CP. And it doesn’t matter if the person is of age; it indirectly suggests a child.
It is legal if shes above aoc
Even AOC is cucked since it benefits foids more than men
Foids slut around ever since they are 14 with older chad
Meanwhile their agematches are still doing kid stuff
(Im minor for glowies)
 

Similar threads

Sloppyseconds
Replies
145
Views
15K
Matthew24
Matthew24
got.daim
Replies
45
Views
5K
bobstuckatmtn
bobstuckatmtn
Elegant
Replies
66
Views
5K
Regular guy ltn
Regular guy ltn
turneywest
Replies
276
Views
15K
turneywest
turneywest
Y
Replies
12
Views
1K
romanstock
romanstock

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top