"I saw a Stacy with a subhuman!"

ascension

ascension

‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎‎
Joined
Mar 4, 2019
Posts
15,860
Reputation
52,124
I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Fq8_AC9XoAEUzeC.jpg
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: DeadTrees, Xangsane, Gargantuan and 38 others
1684008550378

1684008586660
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Ascеnd, DeadTrees, Xangsane and 27 others
You probably think the MTB in your avi is a stacy...
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23114, PURE ARYAN GENETICS, thecel and 2 others
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DeadTrees, cytoplasm, looksmac and 23 others
I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Fq8_AC9XoAEUzeC.jpg
They just rate them in terms of how attracted they are to them not objectively smh.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Xangsane, Deleted member 23114, Deleted member 27836 and 2 others
this forum rates my itis ugly lol
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Chadeep, Deleted member 65576, Deleted member 27987 and 1 other person
It depends on the location..like the best looking girls in your school are Stacie's, on average they can be 6.5 or 7/10 and where I live it's not a rare sight to see a 6/10 or 7/10 girl with a 4/10 cool personality guy..I don't know about the west and I'm not going believe blackpillers who says White Girls are Chad only until I see it with my eyes irl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Deleted member 2100, thecel and 1 other person
They just rate them in terms of how attracted they are to them not objectively smh.

It’s close to objective if the average man finds them just as attractive as they find them attractive.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AspiringMogger
I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Fq8_AC9XoAEUzeC.jpg
Im a pretty harsh rater tbnh if i sayit you shopuld believe me
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascension
This is Stacy
1684014353723
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: TARAN, Xangsane, 2023cel and 3 others
It’s close to objective if the average man finds them just as attractive as they find them attractive.
I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

IMG 4791


Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
IMG 4804

It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29078 and thecel
I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

View attachment 2202067

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
View attachment 2202091
It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.

So the average man would find the above woman attractive to a degree between how attractive you find her and how attractive the robust-preferring retard finds her.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AspiringMogger
I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

View attachment 2202067

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
View attachment 2202091
It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.

It’s close to objective if the average man finds them just as attractive as they find them attractive.

All I’m saying here is that rating according to your personal tastes doesn’t mean your ratings are biased/skewed/unobjective, as long as your taste is conventional.
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AspiringMogger and St.TikTokcel
I don’t agree, most men are naturally attracted to neoteny and they have certain features that they value higher than others. I find this woman incredibly attractive

View attachment 2202067

Whereas some other users would prefer something like this
View attachment 2202091
It’s all preference and some retard would rate the former HTB because he like more robust builds.
I like robust women. The one at the bottom is attractive
 
  • +1
Reactions: 2023cel, thecel and AspiringMogger
So the average man would find the above woman attractive to a degree between how attractive you find her and how attractive the robust-preferring retard finds her.
Yea looks past a certain point is all subjective. Same for men tbh.

 
  • WTF
Reactions: thecel
All I’m saying here is that rating according to your personal tastes doesn’t mean your ratings are biased/skewed/unobjective, as long as your taste is conventional.
Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

IMG 4506
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS, thecel and ascension
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and Bushman
Yea looks past a certain point is all subjective. Same for men tbh.


Attractiveness is always objective. Subjectiveness isn’t about the variance in opinions. Objective vs subjective is all about the source of truth.

Attractiveness to an individual is objective because person A finds person B attractive to a certain amount that is the truth.

Attractiveness to a population is objective, just obviously. Bob is more attractive than Joe on the population scale if we demonstrate that Bob evokes a greater reaction of attraction from other people than Joe does.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: 2023cel and AspiringMogger
foids shouldnt be rated by psl and bones tbh, that shit is more for men. Women are feminine, hence why feminine features are mire attractive rather than these trannymaxxed «stacies» alot of niggas would consider to call. I agree with @AspiringMogger
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 2023cel, AspiringMogger and thecel
Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

View attachment 2202115

We don’t rate men based on their measured ratios JFL. Maybe you do, but keep being a PSL fuck then.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: AspiringMogger
foids shouldnt be rated by psl and bones tbh, that shit is more for men. Women are feminine, hence why feminine features are mire attractive rather than these trannymaxxed «stacies» alot of niggas would consider to call. I agree with @AspiringMogger

Just rate by look bro it’s that simple. The rationale behind some users choosing to rate by analysis is beyond me.
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: AspiringMogger and thecel
I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Fq8_AC9XoAEUzeC.jpg
Usually the Stacy is a MTB and the subhuman is MTN.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77134 and ascension
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77134, St.TikTokcel and thecel
Exactly. Users here underrate men and overrate women.

or it’s a natural consequence of the fact that women are on average just better-looking than men are.

 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: St.TikTokcel and ascension
We don’t rate men based on their measured ratios JFL. Maybe you do, but keep being a PSL fuck then.
What do you rate based on then?
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
What do you rate based on then?

My scale is like rating from –5 to +5, where the midpoint is neither repulsive nor attractive. The neutral point (5/10) doesn’t necessarily need to match the population mean. 5/10 happens to be the male average only by coincidence.

When rating other men to give them looksmaxing advice, I aim to estimate how the female population on average would perceive him. I do this through intuition and compensation. I rate a man “by feel”, but I make sure to compensate for the ways that my preferences deviate from the norm (so far I haven’t found any significant deviations when it comes to the male gender).

When rating other women, the purpose is to express how I personally feel about them, so I rate by my own preferences with zero consideration for matching the rating to the tastes of the male population. This leads to me “overrating” overweight women. It’s not truly overrating, because my ratings of women aren’t intended to represent the taste of the average man, and rather are intended to express the attraction that I feel.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: AspiringMogger
My scale is like rating from –5 to +5, where the midpoint is neither repulsive nor attractive. The neutral point (5/10) doesn’t necessarily need to match the population mean. 5/10 happens to be the male average only by coincidence.

When rating other men to give them looksmaxing advice, I aim to estimate how the female population on average would perceive him. I do this through intuition and compensation. I rate a man “by feel”, but I make sure to compensate for the ways that my preferences deviate from the norm (so far I haven’t found any significant deviations when it comes to the male gender).

When rating other women, the purpose is to express how I personally feel about them, so I rate by my own preferences with zero consideration for matching the rating to the tastes of the male population. This leads to me “overrating” overweight women. It’s not truly overrating, because my ratings of women aren’t intended to represent the taste of the average man, and rather are intended to express the attraction that I feel.
seems legit. You offer rates in pm?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: St.TikTokcel, thecel and ascension
or it’s a natural consequence of the fact that women are on average just better-looking than men are.

Just look at some of my threads in ratings. Different users rate different women differently
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Just look at some of my threads in ratings. Different users rate different women differently

yes and that’s ok cus men usually rate women to express how they feel about their looks
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 27836
It took you 4 years to figure out that some posters on this site are idiots and/or trolls?
 
Okay so for men, we measure their midface, chin to philtrum etc. but for women we go on whatever we feel? Nah be fr.

Plenty of women I find ugly I’d rate highly like this foid, because she is aesthetic.

View attachment 2202115
that bitch only needs 2x lips to be omega fogger :feelshmm:
 
  • Woah
Reactions: AspiringMogger
stacy is a blonde 170-175cm girl with big tits and nice ass, most likely cheerleader and good education
 
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS
I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Fq8_AC9XoAEUzeC.jpg
Any creature with white skin and a hole = Stacy
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascension and Deleted member 21716
bro this forum calls any woman Stacy tbh

Just be Woman theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 77134
stacy is a blonde 170-175cm girl with big tits and nice ass, most likely cheerleader and good education
cheerleader and good education don’t go in the same sentence
 
  • Woah
Reactions: ascension
I don't believe a single one of these threads because guys here have no idea how to rate. The amount of LTB's and landwhales who get called Stacies on this site is unbelievable. There was a thread yesterday about a girl who literally looked like Jonah Hill, being called a Stacy.

Fq8_AC9XoAEUzeC.jpg

Actual Stacies are very rare. Among women in the 18-35 age group, Stacies are 1 in 1000(0.1%) if not rarer. In the 36+ age group, they are much more rare due to the deterioration of physical attractiveness. Anyone claiming he sees a lot of Stacies is lying. Anyone that says he sees a lot of Stacies with subhumans/normies is gigalying. Stacylites are significantly more common. In the 18-35 age group, probably 1-2%, while HTBs are 10%. Most people see a dolled up skinny/gymmaxxed HTB and they call her Stacy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascension
Actual Stacies are very rare. Among women in the 18-35 age group, Stacies are 1 in 1000(0.1%) if not rarer. In the 36+ age group, they are much more rare due to the deterioration of physical attractiveness. Anyone claiming he sees a lot of Stacies is lying. Anyone that says he sees a lot of Stacies with subhumans/normies is gigalying. Stacylites are significantly more common. In the 18-35 age group, probably 1-2%, while HTBs are 10%. Most people see a dolled up skinny/gymmaxxed HTB and they call her Stacy.
honestly depends on location and what you mean by stacy, some users on this site think a starved skeleton woman with manly lean face is a “stacy”, all the models posted here prove that
 

Similar threads

_MVP_
Replies
2
Views
27
_MVP_
_MVP_
Azi.org
Replies
4
Views
54
Revent
Revent
veppandi guhan
Replies
0
Views
25
veppandi guhan
veppandi guhan
monk321
Replies
24
Views
152
monk321
monk321
YoloHatesFoids666
Replies
11
Views
136
YoloHatesFoids666
YoloHatesFoids666

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top