Deleted member 11074
Silver
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Posts
- 621
- Reputation
- 1,472
I’m better looking, taller, and they have a girlfriend..
Just be NT theory
Just be NT theory
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
they are betabuxx
so what retardThis was in high school nigga
IDK they might have wider, better social circle, or they are more socially popular?This was in high school nigga
men overrate themselves and underrate other men... just saying
Looks isn't only about height.I’m better looking, taller, and they have a girlfriend..
Just be NT theory
Bruh it's crazyLooks isn't only about height.
You might think you are better looking but women have chosen them as better looking.
It's also possible that these are beta orbiters used for resources but not given sex, but I think more than likely you might just not know what is physically attractive.
If you know they are in a relationship and you feel comfortable posting the pictures here, those outlier cases that challenge our current looks theories might be useful for improving our knowledge and understanding of what is physically attractive to women.
Because at the end of the day, it's all just theories and useful models. Some models are useful but all are wrong. Only women can know what's physically attractive to them and they are incapable speaking honestly about it, therefore we can only know by who they choose to sleep with.
Michael Jordan is a super interesting example. He's obviously healthy and strong but doesn't fit into most of the checkboxes we've figured out.Bruh it's crazy
Women think Michael B Jordan is GL but his chin is recessed as fuck and he doesn't really have "hunter eyes" and niggas on here would say he's 3.5 PSL if he posted his picture here like a regular guy would.
There's something to women's physical preferences that PSL just doesn't get.
There are dudes that women just like the look of for whatever fucking reason
ftfyaverage or slightly above Looks are worthless if you are not NT
Rating men based off PSL will give you an accurate correlation to their SMV 80-90% of the timeMichael Jordan is a super interesting example. He's obviously healthy and strong but doesn't fit into most of the checkboxes we've figured out.
I think it might be far more complicated than we think, with different features having both positive and negative effects depending on what other facial features they are combined with, as well as the genes and features of the woman who's viewing him.
But I do think the features that we have figured out here, square jaw, muscle, etc. are generally good overall and far better than trying to looks max blindly from our completely wrong male intuition, or even worse trying to looks max based on what women say rather the patterns we're able to find in their hookup and dating behaviors.