I see guys uglier than me with girlfriends

Deleted member 11074

Deleted member 11074

Silver
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Posts
621
Reputation
1,472
I’m better looking, taller, and they have a girlfriend..

Just be NT theory
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8318, Deleted member 6785, Stare and 1 other person
Bubblegreycel
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 1751, Deleted member 5698 and 8 others
they are betabuxx
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5698 and bonsai
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 5698, Lolcel and 2 others
Same often see it, as well as manlets with gfs. :feelsthink:
 
  • +1
Reactions: lutte
men overrate themselves and underrate other men... just saying
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 5698, Deleted member 6475 and 8 others
It's your personality bro, you have to stop giving off incel vibes. Being funny is the best way to a girl's heart.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 5698, AutismMaxing and 4 others
Looks are worthless if you are not NT
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8318, Tusseleif and coping ethnic
men overrate themselves and underrate other men... just saying

If I posted a picture of them, you would call them subhuman too
 
The foids are cheating on them
 
No pics

No care
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutismMaxing
I’m better looking, taller, and they have a girlfriend..

Just be NT theory
Looks isn't only about height.

You might think you are better looking but women have chosen them as better looking.

It's also possible that these are beta orbiters used for resources but not given sex, but I think more than likely you might just not know what is physically attractive.

If you know they are in a relationship and you feel comfortable posting the pictures here, those outlier cases that challenge our current looks theories might be useful for improving our knowledge and understanding of what is physically attractive to women.

Because at the end of the day, it's all just theories and useful models. Some models are useful but all are wrong. Only women can know what's physically attractive to them and they are incapable speaking honestly about it, therefore we can only know by who they choose to sleep with.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2100, Deleted member 1751 and Deleted member 245
Looks isn't only about height.

You might think you are better looking but women have chosen them as better looking.

It's also possible that these are beta orbiters used for resources but not given sex, but I think more than likely you might just not know what is physically attractive.

If you know they are in a relationship and you feel comfortable posting the pictures here, those outlier cases that challenge our current looks theories might be useful for improving our knowledge and understanding of what is physically attractive to women.

Because at the end of the day, it's all just theories and useful models. Some models are useful but all are wrong. Only women can know what's physically attractive to them and they are incapable speaking honestly about it, therefore we can only know by who they choose to sleep with.
Bruh it's crazy

Women think Michael B Jordan is GL but his chin is recessed as fuck and he doesn't really have "hunter eyes" and niggas on here would say he's 3.5 PSL if he posted his picture here like a regular guy would.

There's something to women's physical preferences that PSL just doesn't get.

There are dudes that women just like the look of for whatever fucking reason
 
  • Love it
Reactions: AutismMaxing
Bruh it's crazy

Women think Michael B Jordan is GL but his chin is recessed as fuck and he doesn't really have "hunter eyes" and niggas on here would say he's 3.5 PSL if he posted his picture here like a regular guy would.

There's something to women's physical preferences that PSL just doesn't get.

There are dudes that women just like the look of for whatever fucking reason
Michael Jordan is a super interesting example. He's obviously healthy and strong but doesn't fit into most of the checkboxes we've figured out.

I think it might be far more complicated than we think, with different features having both positive and negative effects depending on what other facial features they are combined with, as well as the genes and features of the woman who's viewing him.

But I do think the features that we have figured out here, square jaw, muscle, etc. are generally good overall and far better than trying to looks max blindly from our completely wrong male intuition, or even worse trying to looks max based on what women say rather the patterns we're able to find in their hookup and dating behaviors.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 245
Michael Jordan is a super interesting example. He's obviously healthy and strong but doesn't fit into most of the checkboxes we've figured out.

I think it might be far more complicated than we think, with different features having both positive and negative effects depending on what other facial features they are combined with, as well as the genes and features of the woman who's viewing him.

But I do think the features that we have figured out here, square jaw, muscle, etc. are generally good overall and far better than trying to looks max blindly from our completely wrong male intuition, or even worse trying to looks max based on what women say rather the patterns we're able to find in their hookup and dating behaviors.
Rating men based off PSL will give you an accurate correlation to their SMV 80-90% of the time

But of course there are some men we're completely wrong about. They break almost all the rules but women find them hot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1751, Deleted member 5698 and AutismMaxing

Similar threads

Sabork
Replies
20
Views
81
sub5lncel
sub5lncel
changfrommumbai
Replies
6
Views
73
chestermador
chestermador
Jatt
Replies
31
Views
123
davidlaidisme67
davidlaidisme67
sln
Replies
26
Views
106
sln
sln
Lorence
Replies
9
Views
71
fraudster#1
fraudster#1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top