I still don't get what a MTN looks like

[goo25]

Like sometimes on here i see decent looking guys getting rated MTN, while some others ugly guy being rated the same. Can someone post a pic of a textbook mtn or explain it

 

[goo25]

bump

 

[Deleted member 31562]

Didn’t fuck your therapist op?

 

[goo25]

Didn’t fuck your therapist op?

no im sorry if i failed u

 

[Kamui]

MTN is literally just a normie 5/10

 

[goo25]

MTN is literally just a normie 5/10

ok i know this
but i can't figure It out when i look at someone Who gets rated mtn 90% of times

 

[sub5outsider]

this hes now with Stacie enjoying life

 

[goo25]

View attachment 2343932this hes now with Stacie enjoying life

i think this would look ok if leanmaxxed

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

View attachment 2343932this hes now with Stacie enjoying life

This guy is attractive, HTN at worst
Having an average looking face in terms of ratios with decent pheno is ideal
MTN is just bland looks, no appeal and nothing catches the eye that's good or bad

 

[goo25]

This guy is attractive, HTN at worst
Having an average looking face in terms of ratios with decent pheno is ideal
MTN is just bland looks, no appeal and nothing catches the eye that's good or bad

I think i literally have what u said, I have good ratios, med-hispanic pheno, but average facial features apart from the lips

 

[NateJacobs]

This guy is attractive, HTN at worst
Having an average looking face in terms of ratios with decent pheno is ideal
MTN is just bland looks, no appeal and nothing catches the eye that's good or bad

In no world is that a htn he’s a turbo normie

 

[ItsOver999]

High Mtns have nothing hot about them but arent totally deformed

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

In no world is that a htn he’s a turbo normie

Go outside and see how much he mogs the average person between 18-30
"Average" ratios aren't common, most people deviate from the norm for their phenotype

 

[Deleted member 32826]

ltn here is MTN while MTN here is a chadlite.

An actual MTN is someone who's has no jawline barely any hair basic features etc.

 

[goo25]

ltn here is MTN while MTN here is a chadlite.

An actual MTN is someone who's has no jawline barely any hair basic features etc.

what?

 

[damiki]

Like sometimes on here i see decent looking guys getting rated MTN, while some others ugly guy being rated the same. Can someone post a pic of a textbook mtn or explain it

mtn is dead average so somebody who has no signs of recession but not any striking features just bland

 

[goo25]

mtn is dead average so somebody who has no signs of recession but not any striking features just bland

i am recessed (only visible from side) and have no striking features but got rated strong mtn frontally

 

[HitAndRun]

Like me even tho I have striking features but pretty bad ones too

 

[Blackgymmax]

I think i literally have what u said, I have good ratios, med-hispanic pheno, but average facial features apart from the lips

Good ratios kek did you measure them with an app

 

[Deleted member 18582]

website ratings is so fucked up. They think htn is mtn

 

[Blackgymmax]

mtn is dead average so somebody who has no signs of recession but not any striking features just bland

Cope

 

[goo25]

Good ratios kek did you measure them with an app

people told me idk

 

[Blackgymmax]

people told me idk

You should measure yourself

 

[goo25]

You should measure yourself

im not an Expert about these things i don't know which are the Ideal ratios etc

 

[Deleted member 18582]

This is literally a MTN and the only reason someone disagrees is because their stunted frontal lobe brains can't but take the opportunity to make some seething cringe joke about how he is sub chadlite for reps

Users metrics are their TikTok algorithm feed which is already selecting for better looking people. You can tell who goes outside and who doesn't by their rating

 

[Blackgymmax]

im not an Expert about these things i don't know which are the Ideal ratios etc

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

 

[goo25]

This is literally a MTN and the only reason someone disagrees is because their stunted frontal lobe brains can't but take the opportunity to make some seething cringe joke about how he is sub chadlite for reps

Users metrics are their TikTok algorithm feed which is already selecting for better looking people. You can tell who goes outside and who doesn't by their rating

but this Is ugly i've seen much Better looking people getting rated mtn

 

[NateJacobs]

Go outside and see how much he mogs the average person between 18-30
"Average" ratios aren't common, most people deviate from the norm for their phenotype

He gets mogged by most people I see irl having average ratios doesn’t automatically make you a htn especially this guy

 

[Deleted member 18582]

but this Is ugly i've seen much Better looking people getting rated mtn

Because they're wrong?
Is it not clear?


It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8

These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:

Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie

This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance

 

[damiki]

Cope

explain

i am recessed (only visible from side) and have no striking features but got rated strong mtn frontally

maybe good harmony or something I havent seen your face idk.

Every face is different incredible harmony on a recessed face with no striking features can maybe reach htn and a face with chad face structure and bad harmony can be mtn or lower

 

[SidharthTheSlayer]

He gets mogged by most people I see irl having average ratios doesn’t automatically make you a htn especially this guy

Where do you live brother? Is the average income of your neighborhood over 6 figures? No way the average person mogs that face
This is just more proof that org users don't go outside tbh
There are more people that would be considered ugly LTNs here than the distribution would actually imply

 

[Blackgymmax]

Because they're wrong?
Is it not clear?


It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8

These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:

Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie

This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance

Your rates are unrealistic

 

[Deleted member 18582]

No. Mine are realistic. Your rates are unrealistic.

 

[goo25]

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

I measured
midface 1.06 i think it's good
fhwr 1.60 it's probably not good but expected cause im high trust
eyes spacing Is one eye apart so It should be good

 

[goo25]

I measured
midface 1.06 i think it's good
fhwr 1.60 it's probably not good but expected cause im high trust
eyes spacing Is one eye apart so It should be good

also gonial angle Is pretty High around 128°

 

[NateJacobs]

Where do you live brother? Is the average income of your neighborhood over 6 figures? No way the average person mogs that face
This is just more proof that org users don't go outside tbh
There are more people that would be considered ugly LTNs here than the distribution would actually imply

Went out with my friends almost every night this month and have done multiple 2 mans aswell u can cope but ratios ≠ automatic gl + plus I’m an actual HTN this guy is def below me by at least a point

 

[Deleted member 53983]

Because they're wrong?
Is it not clear?


It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8

These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:

Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie

This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance

I agree with ur point, but ur ratings seem sarcastic. You can get a good and honest psl rating but not from forum autist with brain damage (at least 50% of forum). There’s a lot of nice people who can rate you and give advices, listen only what they say and forget about anything else

 

[Deleted member 53983]

Because they're wrong?
Is it not clear?


It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8

These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:

Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie

This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance

Some people can call you ugly for having a different pheno, or some people with let’s say mtn rating wouldn’t rate anyone higher than this cuz they’re jealous and coping