goo25
side profile-cel
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2023
- Posts
- 6,298
- Reputation
- 4,831
Like sometimes on here i see decent looking guys getting rated MTN, while some others ugly guy being rated the same. Can someone post a pic of a textbook mtn or explain it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
no im sorry if i failed uDidn’t fuck your therapist op?
ok i know thisMTN is literally just a normie 5/10
i think this would look ok if leanmaxxedView attachment 2343932this hes now with Stacie enjoying life
This guy is attractive, HTN at worstView attachment 2343932this hes now with Stacie enjoying life
I think i literally have what u said, I have good ratios, med-hispanic pheno, but average facial features apart from the lipsThis guy is attractive, HTN at worst
Having an average looking face in terms of ratios with decent pheno is ideal
MTN is just bland looks, no appeal and nothing catches the eye that's good or bad
In no world is that a htn he’s a turbo normieThis guy is attractive, HTN at worst
Having an average looking face in terms of ratios with decent pheno is ideal
MTN is just bland looks, no appeal and nothing catches the eye that's good or bad
Go outside and see how much he mogs the average person between 18-30In no world is that a htn he’s a turbo normie
what?ltn here is MTN while MTN here is a chadlite.
An actual MTN is someone who's has no jawline barely any hair basic features etc.
mtn is dead average so somebody who has no signs of recession but not any striking features just blandLike sometimes on here i see decent looking guys getting rated MTN, while some others ugly guy being rated the same. Can someone post a pic of a textbook mtn or explain it
i am recessed (only visible from side) and have no striking features but got rated strong mtn frontallymtn is dead average so somebody who has no signs of recession but not any striking features just bland
Good ratios kek did you measure them with an appI think i literally have what u said, I have good ratios, med-hispanic pheno, but average facial features apart from the lips
Copemtn is dead average so somebody who has no signs of recession but not any striking features just bland
people told me idkGood ratios kek did you measure them with an app
You should measure yourselfpeople told me idk
im not an Expert about these things i don't know which are the Ideal ratios etcYou should measure yourself
im not an Expert about these things i don't know which are the Ideal ratios etc
but this Is ugly i've seen much Better looking people getting rated mtnThis is literally a MTN and the only reason someone disagrees is because their stunted frontal lobe brains can't but take the opportunity to make some seething cringe joke about how he is sub chadlite for reps
Users metrics are their TikTok algorithm feed which is already selecting for better looking people. You can tell who goes outside and who doesn't by their rating
He gets mogged by most people I see irl having average ratios doesn’t automatically make you a htn especially this guyGo outside and see how much he mogs the average person between 18-30
"Average" ratios aren't common, most people deviate from the norm for their phenotype
Because they're wrong?but this Is ugly i've seen much Better looking people getting rated mtn
explainCope
maybe good harmony or something I havent seen your face idk.i am recessed (only visible from side) and have no striking features but got rated strong mtn frontally
Where do you live brother? Is the average income of your neighborhood over 6 figures? No way the average person mogs that faceHe gets mogged by most people I see irl having average ratios doesn’t automatically make you a htn especially this guy
Your rates are unrealisticBecause they're wrong?
Is it not clear?
It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8
These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:
Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie
This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance
I measuredIdeal facial ratios and proportions
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...looksmax.org
also gonial angle Is pretty High around 128°I measured
midface 1.06 i think it's good
fhwr 1.60 it's probably not good but expected cause im high trust
eyes spacing Is one eye apart so It should be good
Went out with my friends almost every night this month and have done multiple 2 mans aswell u can cope but ratios ≠ automatic gl + plus I’m an actual HTN this guy is def below me by at least a pointWhere do you live brother? Is the average income of your neighborhood over 6 figures? No way the average person mogs that face
This is just more proof that org users don't go outside tbh
There are more people that would be considered ugly LTNs here than the distribution would actually imply
I agree with ur point, but ur ratings seem sarcastic. You can get a good and honest psl rating but not from forum autist with brain damage (at least 50% of forum). There’s a lot of nice people who can rate you and give advices, listen only what they say and forget about anything elseBecause they're wrong?
Is it not clear?
It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8
These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:
Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie
This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance
Some people can call you ugly for having a different pheno, or some people with let’s say mtn rating wouldn’t rate anyone higher than this cuz they’re jealous and copingBecause they're wrong?
Is it not clear?
It has been the classic issue of PSL ratings from the start. You saw it when at first they was like "nobody can actually be a 9." Literally the only point of doing that was an opportunity to give people a smaller number simply in order to make them feel bad. Since this rating system only exists with "normie ratings" in the background of everyone's minds anyway, and so people are unconsciously making the comparison. It wasn't even a matter of reinterpreting the 1-10 scale, it was literally removing the 10 and THEN putting on a new ratings spread across the 1-8
These days it just takes the form of local forum goblins desperately inflating lower rankings. Here, I propose a new system to help everyone get their psychological fix but still giev people accurate ratings:
Subhuman--Rock
Low Tier Normie-Ultra Low Tier Normie
Mid Tier Normie--Hyper Low Tier Normie
High Tier Normie--Low Tier Normie
Chadlite--Upper Low Tier Normie
Chad--Mid Tier Normie
This way raters get to have their neanderthalic dopamine release from uttering the word low but we can still be on the same page about objective appearance