I want all languages except english to disappear

False
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Spike2010
From "tourism is necessarily" to "some countries csn depend on tourism". What's ur point?

Historical documents can be translated in advance
In all fairness i do get your point yes having one language would be better, but on a wider level and also because i like debating im just saying why this wouldnt be realistic
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Spike2010
And for historical documents, im saying that if you thinking that everyone should speak english, other languages will be lost IF these languages arent still praticed
Do u mean modern languages that r related to the extinct languages in which the documents were written? These languages will still be preserved on paper but even without this link historical documents can be deciphered. How do u think astronomers send encrypted signals to aliens
 
  • +1
Reactions: zumechi
Do u mean modern languages that r related to the extinct languages in which the documents were written? These languages will still be preserved on paper but even without this link historical documents can be deciphered. How do u think astronomers send encrypted signals to aliens
Yeah fair point but its quite unfair if you basicly wiped years of languages mainly from tribes if you were to get EVERYONE. Yeah you could just decipher them but this just wouldnt be neccesery if you didnt do it in the first place
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Spike2010
I have a theory that a lot of the people in northern/northwestern europe speak english better than they speak their native language. These people have accents but so do some of my turkish friends who grew up in the USA and can't speak turkish for shit
I don’t know if I speak better than my native language but I sure as hell mogg most americans who don’t even know the difference between their and there. So do most people I know that are bilingual.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MongolTurk
I mean, obvs anyone who doesnt have deathnic tier IQ speaks English in 2026, it’s the easiest thing in the world to learn.
But I don’t think it should be the universal global language cause American English is basically an african language now, who has not only been hijcked by niggers, but also by marxists.

In most European countries “transphobia” “homophobia” and all, are barely even recognized as concepts because those retarded words came from American language, they don’t exist in ours.
They only managed to sucessfully export “racism”. Which is still shit, and made up fairytale concept that doesnt make sense but anyway. :lul:
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Spike2010
why would any one ruin their culture lmao

none english people probably want the same thing
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Spike2010
I don’t know if I speak better than my native language but I sure as hell mogg most americans who don’t even know the difference between their and there. So do most people I know that are bilingual.
no american will percieve you to mog the average american since you have an accent, you're vocabulary could definetely be superior to a large percentage of the american population though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Spike2010
I mean, obvs anyone who doesnt have deathnic tier IQ speaks English in 2026, it’s the easiest thing in the world to learn.
But I don’t think it should be the universal global language cause American English is basically an african language now, who has not only been hijcked by niggers, but also by marxists.

In most European countries “transphobia” “homophobia” and all, are barely even recognized as concepts because those retarded words came from American language, they don’t exist in ours.
They only managed to sucessfully export “racism”. Which is still shit, and made up fairytale concept that doesnt make sense but anyway. :lul:
Jesus christ man
 
  • +1
Reactions: Spike2010
I mean I don’t think the religion part is necessary, spiritual aspects should always remain completely optional. It shouldn’t be any influence on fucking government though.

The other things I mean, USA basically already tells the world wtf to do and clearly if they don’t they get smoke and it’s not good for them
Still, it's not like there is a one world leader (although, it is beginning to get closer and closer, I'd say in 30 years probably there will be a one world king for life)

It is definitely more risk to have a one world king
 
  • +1
Reactions: Spike2010

Similar threads

bddcoper
Replies
11
Views
54
tansel
tansel
Notcel
Replies
16
Views
60
DildoFaggins
DildoFaggins
isis_Bleach
Replies
1
Views
24
Chazza.cl
Chazza.cl
nolonger_human
Replies
2
Views
16
nolonger_human
nolonger_human
KG4
Replies
33
Views
193
Banned User
Banned User

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top