I’d rather kill a human than an animal

Soy_Beta_Cuckold228

Soy_Beta_Cuckold228

Silver
Joined
May 30, 2026
Posts
685
Reputation
695
Human is the wildest animal
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • Hmm...
Reactions: mltnisme124, niggaboy0321, Aox Ofwar and 4 others
Why?
 
  • +1
Reactions: slaviccartfiend, j1gga and Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
agreed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Soy_Beta_Cuckold228 and ndshinigami
i could never kill an animal thats just cruel tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
Human is the wildest animal
Animals are way less important than people. I'd let any entire species of animal go extinct in a split second to save the lowest human being on the planet.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Ugh..
Reactions: _Zygomatic_, Algernon, niggaboy0321 and 2 others
  • Ugh..
  • Woah
Reactions: _Zygomatic_, Algernon and Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
kys then
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: _Zygomatic_, Algernon and Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
Animals are way less important than people. I'd let any entire species of animal go extinct in a split second to save the lowest human being on the planet.
All animals other than humans exist for our sake, this planet is our birth right simply for existing and being the dominant species.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Algernon, Lefty Rankin and Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefty Rankin
Op's name is Accurate, doesn't have a single fucking argument for his premise, purely emotional take this faggot might as well be a foid with the amount of fucking estrogen running through his vains, kill yourself
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Algernon and Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
wow this guy is seriously sinister

sorry for underestimating you looksmax.org users you guys are real tough
I've strangled one cat. Clawed it's fur out of it's own chin trying to get my hands from around it's neck. Another cat I crushed it's head with my foot. Now that's tough.

Girls love it.
 
«We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals»
No we cannot. That's just a bunch of useless propaganda/conditioning. Human beings are way too complex to get a grip on by judging solely how they treat animals. You are a low IQ npc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon
yeah tbh saw a cat getting killed on tiktok by some uttp kid and it was brutal
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
No we cannot. That's just a bunch of useless propaganda/conditioning. Human beings are way too complex to get a grip on by judging solely how they treat animals. You are a low IQ npc.
Thats just a quote man
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Algernon
elaborate
i don't like violence for the sake of it, but if i have to choose, i'd pick a human any day

humans have more sentience, they are the ones responsible for most causation in this world, whether negative or positive, a human will always be more important then an animal by default (can be bad or good importance)

beyond that, humans have more attachment to the world, while i don't wish for an animal to die unnecessarily, they do not have family and friends who will deeply reflect their passing who they are tied to unlike a human, even then humans have more potential to cause, whether good or bad, even a person entirely alone has more value then any animal, maybe even species, even if they cause a bad event

obviously animal abuse is bad, since they can still cause a net positive, but any time where its the death of any amount of animals to save one human, i'd choose a human to be saved
 
i don't like violence for the sake of it, but if i have to choose, i'd pick a human any day

humans have more sentience, they are the ones responsible for most causation in this world, whether negative or positive, a human will always be more important then an animal by default (can be bad or good importance)

beyond that, humans have more attachment to the world, while i don't wish for an animal to die unnecessarily, they do not have family and friends who will deeply reflect their passing who they are tied to unlike a human, even then humans have more potential to cause, whether good or bad, even a person entirely alone has more value then any animal, maybe even species, even if they cause a bad event

obviously animal abuse is bad, since they can still cause a net positive, but any time where its the death of any amount of animals to save one human, i'd choose a human to be saved
u have a great point but from a logical standpoint all lives are equally meaningless and valueless. There is no inherent meaning in life. So i cant really choose
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Algernon
There is no inherent meaning in life. So i cant really choose
i am religious so i'd partially disagree

either way i'm sure some secular meaning of life could be defined, for example, inventors, scientists, mathematicians, and important politicians will be remembered, typically because they are responsible for a significant cause

value bc increasing the quality of life for others (refridgeration, internet, transporation for example), at a large scale, remembrance of their existence passes down their philosophy, in a way their conscious still is within our lives

not entirely sure tbh, i don't think too much of value for non-religious people, but i'm sure a secularist version of meaning and value in life could be created
 
either way i'm sure some secular meaning of life could be defined, for example, inventors, scientists, mathematicians, and important politicians will be remembered, typically because they are responsible for a significant cause
tbh i dont find being "remembered" or "appreciated" valuable cuz when i am dead i wont have an ability to care.
value bc increasing the quality of life for others (refridgeration, internet, transporation for example), at a large scale, remembrance of their existence passes down their philosophy, in a way their conscious still is within our lives
im probably not a great person but i totally dont wish anything good for the humanity

talking about value, i believe animals have the same value bc they can also " increase the quality of life for others".
have no rep rn:feelscry:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon
tbh i dont find being "remembered" or "appreciated" valuable cuz when i will be dead i wont have an ability to care.

im probably not a great person but i totally dont wish anything good for the humanity

talking about value, i believe animals have the same value bc they can also " increase the quality of life for others".
have no rep rn:feelscry:
about the rep thing, idrc about rep i js like talking about my beliefs

but yeah ik alot of people dont care too much about being remembered, but for me, i like the idea of being remembered because then my philosophy can reach people after death, kind of like my consciousness still existing and arguing

even in an atheists world, i'd still engage myself the same way i think, because my faith is stronger then my logic

idk, while being in an atheists world and just being a hedonist sounds nice, it is not in my nature i think, so I must have some form of faith or value, otherwise why live
 

Similar threads

YaroslavWillAscend
Replies
44
Views
228
johnnyjones
J
WonkyChin186
Replies
16
Views
90
DarkAscender
DarkAscender
P
Replies
3
Views
35
Chadeep
Chadeep
SmallEggplantFailer
Replies
0
Views
23
SmallEggplantFailer
SmallEggplantFailer

Users who are viewing this thread

  • bumhash
  • _Zygomatic_
  • Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
Back
Top