kovacs
Master
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2023
- Posts
- 1,556
- Reputation
- 1,281
smv wise probably 6 foot 7 imo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
6'7 i agree. anything less gets mogged too oftensmv wise probably 6 foot 7 imo
Lmao i see dudes over 6’5 in like 5000 in one6'7 i agree. anything less gets mogged too often
Why 6’8 and not 7’8If you could snap your fingers and be any height you wanted, it would depend on what you want in life. For SMV 6'4, 6'5 if in the Netherlands. For classic roided bodybuilding 6'0 max. To have the perfect gymbro body like Thurston etc. 6'1. If you wanna be a model 6'2, etc. If you wanna mog as many men as possible without caring about potential health or practical problems, 6'8.
smv scales pretty linearly up until at-least 6 foot 3. after 6 foot 4 it start to drop of, but still increases.doesnt matter past 6'2 anyways
youre just coping6'2.5, maybe 6'2.75, in most likelyhood
6'2 6'3 same thing im going to stuff you in a locker currysmv scales pretty linearly up until at-least 6 foot 3. after 6 foot 4 it start to drop of, but still increases.
There isn't a place in the world where 6'5-6'6 gets mogged often, 6'6 is literally average NBA height.6'7 i agree. anything less gets mogged too often
Not coping, broski. 190 cm is absolute perfectionyoure just coping
6'4 always has more smv than 6'2.75
not when standing next to someone 195 cmNot coping, broski. 190 cm is absolute perfection
cope, a 195 cm guy gets mogged by a 2 meter guynot when standing next to someone 195 cm
im 6'4'' in the netherlands and i get mogged very rarelyThere isn't a place in the world where 6'5-6'6 gets mogged often.
obviously but no so much as the 195 cm mogs the 190 cm as the gains start to taper offcope, a 195 cm guy gets mogged by a 2 meter guy
sounds about right, you're taller than 96% of the male population and the heights it takes to mog you are 0th percentile.im 6'4'' in the netherlands and i get mogged very rarely
Anything above 190 is freak territory and below 190 is manletnot when standing next to someone 195 cm
coping 195 is ubermensch territory and obviously more attractive to women with the added effect of dominating other menAnything above 190 is freak territory and below 190 is manlet
such a great answer manIf you could snap your fingers and be any height you wanted, it would depend on what you want in life. For SMV 6'4, 6'5 if in the Netherlands. For classic roided bodybuilding 6'0 max. To have the perfect gymbro body like Thurston etc. max 6'1. If you wanna be a model 6'2. If you wanna mog as many men as possible without having too many health or practical problems, 6'8. And so on. Personally my ideal height for the aesthetics and look I'd want to have is 6'3, I want to be noticeably and firmly tall and mog most men but still be capable of blending with a crowd and not be a giant who people point to when outside, like the male equivalent of a woman with enormous boobs. Plus proportions start to look bad after 6'3 according to modeling agencies and I agree. Anything close to the average NBA height (6'6) is too much for me.
If it wasn't for retarded female standards and the Netherlands 6'2 would be the best tradeoff between SMV and aesthetics/proportions.
Copecoping 195 is ubermensch territory and obviously more attractive to women with the added effect of dominating other men
Bluepilled cope, there is a 0.0001% chance that you could meet Sultan Kösen, the tallest man in the world who's 8'3, Yao Ming (7'6), Shaquile O'Neal wearing lifts (he has to cause he's only 7'1, so he'd be 7'3 to you) or other super tall NBA players and get mogged to oblivion and cucked by your gf as a result. You'd have to be at least 8'5 so that even Kösen theoretically wearing lifts couldn't mog you.if you are not at least 7 foot you will be mogged on a daily basis
HEIGHTmaxx ASAP
what height are youCope
190 cmwhat height are you

yeah there's a reason why you almost never see handsome Hollywood stars or models above 6'2-6'3. Even 6'3 is considered too tall by modeling agencies, they only make exceptions for top-tier guys like Chico.such a great answer man
and definitely agreed on the 6'2 or 6'3 being the best height ofc not considering the "mog" effect
This study agrees, SMV declines a lot after 6'4, at least in the US. Though tbf guys who place so much emphasis on height are probably thinking more in terms of mogging men rather than SMV specifically.6'3 is ideal. More than 6'5 is not cool, convenient or attractive. Incels often hypercompensate be it jaw or height
did that study just ask what height theyd find tolerable? that suggests women to take into account factors other than raw attractionThis study agrees, SMV declines a lot after 6'4, at least in the US. Though tbf guys who place so much emphasis on height are probably thinking more in terms of mogging men rather than SMV specifically.
They looked at the number of women who gave a "yes" answer to the men when it came to accepting them as potential partners, their heights, and compiled them into that table. There's a lot of other more complex statistical stuff and analysis they did with the data but that table's results are the key part for me.did that study just ask what height theyd find tolerable? that suggests women to take into account factors other than raw attraction
i feel like that takes into consideration factors other than pure attraction e.g., having to bend your neck while kissing, and other things. pure attraction minus downsides of being taller would imply a most attractive height a little higher than is said there.They looked at the number of women who gave a "yes" answer to the men when it came to accepting them as potential partners, their heights, and compiled them into that table. There's a lot of other more complex statistical stuff and analysis they did with the data but that table's results are the key part for me.
seems consistent with the other one, SMV benefit declines after 6'4did that study just ask what height theyd find tolerable? that suggests women to take into account factors other than raw attraction
see this study:
in a us population thoughseems consistent with the other one, SMV benefit declines after 6'4
6'4 is 95th percentile in the Netherlands so I think you're good, actually you're right at the beginning of heights where you don't need lifts for the NL. I mean, you're 4 inches above the average Dutch male zoomer height, I think you're well past the point where height could negatively affect your SMV.i feel like that takes into consideration factors other than pure attraction e.g., having to bend your neck while kissing, and other things. pure attraction minus downsides of being taller would imply a most attractive height a little higher than is said there.
also: they asked women, thats an absurd methodology for measuring attraction, which would be better measured graphically using pictures or even irl(not feasible i know)
i think you would if conducted in a similar fashion- find that women value personality, virtues and other such stuff much higher than looks- if you were to just ask them instead of verifying in some empirically useful way.
ideal height is probably 95-99th percentile in a given population, so it would probably still be worth it for me to wear insoles at 6'4'' in the netherlands.
the power of nichemaxxing is also understated. imagine how much more attractive a 6 foot 6 guy is among women that are also very tall, thats a valid strategy for some men.
i have pretty good proportions.6'4 is 95th percentile in the Netherlands so I think you're good, actually you're right at the beginning of heights where you don't need lifts for the NL. I mean, you're 4 inches above the average Dutch male zoomer height, I think you're well past the point where height could negatively affect your SMV.
As for me, while the NL definitely has a very high average male height, I think women do care about proportions and overall aesthetics in addition to height. A 6'8 man, unless he has top genetics, is in all likelihood a hunching lanklet, it's just not an aesthetic or proportional height. I think 6'3 would still be seen as tall and attractive cause 6'3 proportions are 6'3 proportions no matter where you are. But dunno, hopefully I'll never have to find out by going there.
I don't think there's a place in the world where 193.5 cm wouldn't be seen as a tall attractive height, in the Netherlands it's 12.5 cm above average male height, statistically equivalent to 188.5 cm in the US, 0.5 cm above what is considered the ideal male height there. That said 1.5 cm insoles are practically nothing, my limit for when they stop being comfortable/discreet is 4 cm, so sure you have nothing to lose.in a us population though
western european equivalent is 6'5''. dutch equivalent 6'6'' might be higher still if you look at ethnically dutch in northern provinces.
would you recommend frauding from 193.5 cm to 195 cm using insoles? i have these very comfortable ones that are unnoticable
and prob for Maher isn't he like 6'4 or 6'5yeah there's a reason why you almost never see handsome Hollywood stars or models above 6'2-6'3. Even 6'3 is considered too tall by modeling agencies, they only make exceptions for top-tier guys like Chico.