J
Jerryterry129
Zephir
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2019
- Posts
- 1,993
- Reputation
- 2,557
PIC BELLOW OF TWO BROTHERS.
The one on the left and the one on the right are brothers
disregard the one in the middle.
the left one nuked his dht and the right one has high dht
As you see the right one(the one that has dht) looks like a complete cuck. Not only that but his skin looks 10x worse. It’s as if he’s aged 10 years. He has fine lines and everything
meanwhile the one with low dht has crystal clear skin and noticibly way more muscle. And just in general has a more aggressive/dominant appearance and stance
test is what builds muscle btw not dht so that’s why he’s more muscular. Dht just makes muscles harder
but my question is, why does the high dht guy have shit skin compared to the low dht guy..? I thought the popular belief in here was that dht was suppose to be good for collagen and that low dht was bad for collagen?
The one on the left and the one on the right are brothers
disregard the one in the middle.
the left one nuked his dht and the right one has high dht
As you see the right one(the one that has dht) looks like a complete cuck. Not only that but his skin looks 10x worse. It’s as if he’s aged 10 years. He has fine lines and everything
meanwhile the one with low dht has crystal clear skin and noticibly way more muscle. And just in general has a more aggressive/dominant appearance and stance
test is what builds muscle btw not dht so that’s why he’s more muscular. Dht just makes muscles harder
but my question is, why does the high dht guy have shit skin compared to the low dht guy..? I thought the popular belief in here was that dht was suppose to be good for collagen and that low dht was bad for collagen?
