If im at least 5/10 facially and average height how far will getting a lean physique take me

[Broski]

How much does a lean physique ascend you if you are an average dude with average/above average frame

 

[Artemis]

How much does a lean physique ascend you if you are an average dude with average/above average frame

A LOT.

Lean physique is quite rare. But your frame is VERY important. THey key is having a good shoulder-waist ratio while lean. Bideltoid-pill. If you do, it is sth akin to a woman with big tits. A lot of women would make a discount for your face.

In case of doubt, use this dictionary from womenish:

V-taper = big tits.
Height = big ass.
Face = face.
Hands = ?

 

[SA7]

V-taper = big tits.
Height = big ass.

I thought it was
muscle=ass
height=tits

 

[Deleted member 19766]

A LOT.

Lean physique is quite rare. But your frame is VERY important. THey key is having a good shoulder-waist ratio while lean. Bideltoid-pill. If you do, it is sth akin to a woman with big tits. A lot of women would make a discount for your face.

In case of doubt, use this dictionary from womenish:

V-taper = big tits.
Height = big ass.
Face = face.
Hands = ?

Height =/= Big ass. Height is LIFE for men, women are fine no matter what.
Shoulders can't be compared much to tits either. For men, wide shoulders/robust build is CRUCIAL to being seen as masculine and whatnot. Women can still pull the skinny model look and be seen just as equally.

 

[Artemis]

I thought it was
muscle=ass
height=tits

Yes, maybe I was lost in the translation

 

[Artemis]

Height =/= Big ass. Height is LIFE for men, women are fine no matter what.

No point in trying to establish a PERFECT analogy. The point is: women are aroused by height ~ the same as men are aroused by a big ass on a woman.

Also, while a short height is definitely death for a guy, a woman without an ass is at the BOTTOM OF THE RANKS no matter what her face is.

Shoulders can't be compared much to tits either. For men, wide shoulders/robust build is CRUCIAL to being seen as masculine and whatnot. Women can still pull the skinny model look and be seen just as equally.

Yes, AND as you notice, women also often date men without broad shoulders. In fact, I would actually argue, that in the west broad-enough shoulders are actually rarer than good height... so women still date men-twinks. However, both twink-men and women without tits will be always seen as... PASSABLE but not extremely sexy.

So IMO good analogy.

 

[Blackgymmax]

Get jacked and find out

 

[stressftw]

Sorta of, but women can grow her ass in the gym while we cant change height.

This itself changes everything about perception, something that can be easily changed naturally lose it's value, that's why Heightpill in my opinion is so brutal, works like some sort of statuspill on attraction, it's not even solely a raw attraction quality itself

 

[alphamaxxxx]

Lol male height isn't even close to equivalent as a woman's ass - a better analogy would be tits as you can't improve that without surgery

 

[Artemis]

Sorta of, but women can grow her ass in the gym while we cant change height.

This itself changes everything about perception, something that can be easily changed naturally lose it's value, that's why Heightpill in my opinion is so brutal, works like some sort of statuspill on attraction, it's not even solely a raw attraction quality itself

Yeah, this is the TRUE blackpill tbh...

Height is literally "unbeatable", while doing silicone bolt-ons is literally 1-hour oeration, where you can install any size you want, and no one will be even able to tell later, unless seeing the scars.

 

[Artemis]

Lol male height isn't even close to equivalent as a woman's ass - a better analogy would be tits as you can't improve that without surgery

It IS equivalent, if you think about attraction.

And if we go into "how easy it is to change", then there is no comparison because silicone tits is an EASY operation, unlike height.

 

[zharupodrugu]

It will vastly improve your SMV. Im not talking about Uttermode physique, im talking about being close to your natural limit 21-22 FFMI while being 10-13% bodyfat.

 

[alphamaxxxx]

It IS equivalent, if you think about attraction.

And if we go into "how easy it is to change", then there is no comparison because silicone tits is an EASY operation, unlike height.

No, it isn't because a girl with no ass can go to the gym for a year and develop a nice ass while a man can't change his height..... im not counting that LL bullshit the amount of men who undergo the procedure is statistically insignificant

 

[Artemis]

No, it isn't because a girl with no ass can go to the gym for a year and develop a nice ass while a man can't change his height...

Again, you are talking about "how these features are easy to change" in comparison.

Attraction-wise THEY ARE THE SAME.

 

[alphamaxxxx]

Again, you are talking about "how these features are easy to change" in comparison.

Attraction-wise THEY ARE THE SAME.

No - they aren't because the amount of X height men is relatively static - thus the taller the man lower supply and greater demand which inherently increases their value and social statistics show only X% of men are taller than 6 ft globally, while literally any girl can develop a nice ass if they put in the work - the fact that one asset is static while the other is malleable makes the static asset (height) inherently more valuable

 

[LooksOrDeath]

Hands = ?

hands = hands