If looks are objective how do child predators exist?

Wildlife

Wildlife

Musician
Joined
Oct 22, 2024
Posts
2,451
Reputation
4,308
Title.
 
  • +1
Reactions: selfascender
Simple. Looks are not completely objective. Individuals have different preferences.

This is why creating a perfect 10 out of 10 human is impossible according to some blueprint. You can use all the mathematics and calculations that you want to create a perfect face, and someone will disagree.

Some women prefer bald hyper masculine men over pretty boys.

Some women prefer upper eyelid exposure over hooded hunter eyes.

Some men prefer big boobs. Some men prefer big buttocks.

Some women prefer shorter men over taller men (this is VERY rare).

In the case of your title, the same applies.

There will almost always be outliers to a "rule".
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 351683 and Wildlife
Simple. Looks are not completely objective. Individuals have different preferences.

This is why creating a perfect 10 out of 10 human is impossible according to some blueprint. You can use all the mathematics and calculations that you want to create a perfect face, and someone will disagree.

Some women prefer bald hyper masculine men over pretty boys.

Some women prefer upper eyelid exposure over hooded hunter eyes.

Some men prefer big boobs. Some men prefer big buttocks.

Some women prefer shorter men over taller men (this is VERY rare).

In the case of your title, the same applies.

There will almost always be outliers to a "rule".
I wonder if it would be possible to try give men and women very varying types so that everyone has the chance to find a partner. It would increase birthrates but it would be pretty immoral.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ergogenic
explain deeper. looks aren't objective but when ppl say looks are subjective its usually to dis wade realities of living in a society. a lot of things are subjective but we can analyze trends. and they certainly have an effect that you can spot.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wildlife
I wonder if it would be possible to try give men and women very varying types so that everyone has the chance to find a partner. It would increase birthrates but it would be pretty immoral.
It would certainly be immoral because you would end up with newborns with defects that will impair their life as a result of such hyperspecific selection.

Imagine a newborn that grows to only be 1 metre tall as an adult because that is what was selected. That would be a horrible life for them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wildlife
Because child predators are proven to have mental illness
It’s not a looks thing for them
It’s a power dynamic .
 
  • +1
Reactions: Wildlife
just like you can acknowledge another man is good looking, they can acknowledge adults are good looking, but they are attracted to minors. such stupid question
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Wildlife

Similar threads

dinhas
Replies
14
Views
92
dinhas
dinhas
BrutalMogger
Replies
14
Views
140
Whatever
Whatever
shiezen
Replies
34
Views
155
annenisikeyim
annenisikeyim
Node
Replies
6
Views
166
YourLocalLMTN
YourLocalLMTN
Jason Voorhees
Replies
69
Views
418
Donquixote
Donquixote

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top