Wildlife
Musician
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2024
- Posts
- 2,451
- Reputation
- 4,308
Title.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Simple. Looks are not completely objective. Individuals have different preferences.Title.
I wonder if it would be possible to try give men and women very varying types so that everyone has the chance to find a partner. It would increase birthrates but it would be pretty immoral.Simple. Looks are not completely objective. Individuals have different preferences.
This is why creating a perfect 10 out of 10 human is impossible according to some blueprint. You can use all the mathematics and calculations that you want to create a perfect face, and someone will disagree.
Some women prefer bald hyper masculine men over pretty boys.
Some women prefer upper eyelid exposure over hooded hunter eyes.
Some men prefer big boobs. Some men prefer big buttocks.
Some women prefer shorter men over taller men (this is VERY rare).
In the case of your title, the same applies.
There will almost always be outliers to a "rule".
explain deeper. looks aren't objective but when ppl say looks are subjective its usually to dis wade realities of living in a society. a lot of things are subjective but we can analyze trends. and they certainly have an effect that you can spot.Title.
The kids still look attractive (pause not like that)Title.
It would certainly be immoral because you would end up with newborns with defects that will impair their life as a result of such hyperspecific selection.I wonder if it would be possible to try give men and women very varying types so that everyone has the chance to find a partner. It would increase birthrates but it would be pretty immoral.
just like you can acknowledge another man is good looking, they can acknowledge adults are good looking, but they are attracted to minors. such stupid questionTitle.