babymoo
Best Ff2 player
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2025
- Posts
- 1,268
- Reputation
- 1,621
So you're stating we shouldn't apply logic to what happened before the big bang and assume nothing existed until randomly the big bang happened and created all of us?Two things wrong with this:
that's an assumption that doesn't mean anything at the point of the big bang. Why would you try to apply the laws of logic and reasoning to space-time "before" our scope of available observation?
Even if I agree with you and say that everything in the world relies on cause and effect, what created God in that case? Your response would be God is eternal. Why can't the universe just be eternal?
Also assuming what I said was a statement even tho it wasnt, how would it be an assumption and how exactly would that stop at the big bang, you're stuck in a standstill between nothing existeded until yet again the big bang randomly happened or infinite regress in which p or the universe came from p 2 which came from p 3 so on and so fourth.
I responded to your second paragraph in my previous reply but I have a question for you, even if I stated god is eternal, how would the universe be eternal when we have a measurable date of its existent.
Honestly its embarrassing, no matter what claim you make you're just gonna be contradicting yourself.

