![TsarTsar444](/data/avatars/l/1/1669.jpg?1655305296)
TsarTsar444
Asexual peaceful balkan monk
- Joined
- May 5, 2019
- Posts
- 41,541
- Reputation
- 105,475
Low prental T, end yourself asap
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
My ring is longerits literally legit tho, its scientifically proven
my index and ring fingers are exactly the same size, what about u guys
Cope, i also have ideal FWHR and 21inch shoulder but my ring is longer then indexjust lol at this prenatal T fad
a friend of mine has the worst ring to index finger ratio I've ever seen, like his index is almost 2cm longer than his ring
he has an amazing FWTHR, massive shoulders, tiny waist, he's naturally built, absolutely ripped, insanely vascular etc etc.
he's even got an 8inch cock (he showed me a video because no one believed him)
Then you are gaywhat if they are the same
knowing you probably looked at the wrong hang you dipjust lol at this prenatal T fad
a friend of mine has the worst ring to index finger ratio I've ever seen, like his index is almost 2cm longer than his ring
he has an amazing FWTHR, massive shoulders, tiny waist, he's naturally built, absolutely ripped, insanely vascular etc etc.
he's even got an 8inch cock (he showed me a video because no one believed him)
over for meThen you are gay
High prenatal testosterone: smaller and shorter foreheads, thicker and lower brows, wider and shorter noses, broader faces (at the cheekbones]), and more prominent chins
"This approach reveals that some aspects of facial masculinity are organized before puberty, suggesting they develop in response to testosterone exposure in utero (Meindl et al. 2012): individuals with lower 2D:4D ratios tend to have smaller and shorter foreheads, thicker and lower brows, wider and shorter noses, broader faces (across the zygomatic arches), and more prominent chins than individuals with higher ratios (Meindl et al. 2012; Schaefer et al. 2005)."
Lower right-hand 2D:4D ratios associated with higher sperm counts and blood testosterone levels in males; higher ratios associated with high blood levels of oestrogen, luteinizing hormone and prolactin in males and females
Low 2D:4D ratio strongly related to efficiency in aerobic exercise (endurance), weakly to strength
"Speed in endurance races is strongly related to 2D:4D, and may be one factor that underlies the link between sport and 2D:4D, but nothing is known of the relationship between 2D:4D and sprinting speed. Here we show that running times over 50 m were positively correlated with 2D:4D in a sample of 241 boys (i.e. runners with low 2D:4D ran faster than runners with high 2D:4D). The relationship was also found for 50 m split times (at 20, 30, and 40 m) and was independent of age, BMI, and an index of maturity. However, associations between 2D:4D and sprinting speed were much weaker than those reported for endurance running. This suggests that 2D:4D is a relatively weak predictor of strength and a stronger predictor of efficiency in aerobic exercise."
High 2D:4D digit ratio correlated to some forms of lower infertility in men
"The percentage of cases (males) with a 2D:4D ratio equal to or greater than 1 was specially higher among vasal agenesis and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism groups and some statistically significant differences were detected."
Low 2D:4D ratio associated with higher static and explosive strength in males, and with greater height and more body fat in females
"A negative correlation between right hand 2D:4D and vertical jumping, standing long jump, 20 m sprint, 10x5 agility and right hand grip strength in the males. As for the females, although a negative correlation was detected between right hand 2D:4D and height, a positive correlation was found between the same variable and body fat ratio (p<0.05). It can be concluded that while a low 2D:4D ratio was correlated with static and explosive strength, speed and agility in the males, it was correlated with height and body fat ratio in the females."
This is about women. I don't know if males have the same.Low 2D:4D ratio associated with higher neck circumference in adolescents (except in obese individuals)
"There was a significant negative correlation between NC [neck circumference] and 2D:4D ratios of the individuals with normal BMI [Body Mass Index]. However, no statistically significant correlation between NC and 2D:4D ratios was observed in overweight and obese individuals."
Lower 2D:4D ratio in women associated with higher content of muscle mass, lean body mass and water
"The BMI, muscle mass, lean body mass and water in the body demonstrated higher values in men than in women. However, the fat content in men was low. It was found that the relationship exists between muscle mass, lean mass and total water content in the body and the 2D:4D finger length ratio in the left hand in women. A higher level of fetal testosterone, characterized by lower values of the 2nd to 4th finger length ratio, may be associated with a higher content of muscle mass, lean body mass and water in the body of adult women leading a similar lifestyle."
over for me
@knajjd pls don't bro
I'm straight as it gets
sameMy ring is longer
?@Gudru @FatJattMofo
Better you compare your features to the following high prenat T feature, 2d4d is cope for us(looksmaxers) if you dont get the traits
Prenatal Testosterone.
2D:4D Ratio is associated with prenatal Testosterone
TL;DR at the bottom
Face:
Before reading this: Some things in your face are just genetic and have not much to do with prenatal Testosterone.
![]()
- Prenatal Testosterone makes everything wider
An extreme example of this is Jordan Barret:
![]()
Jordan Barret however is a extreme example of this. I chose him to resemble the morph.
![]()
.
Prenatal Testosterone is related to Sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4614768/
Low 2D:4D ratio associated with higher horizontal facial symmetry in males, and with lower facial symmetry in females
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513803000849?via=ihub
---------
- Smaller and shorter + Broader forehead
- Thicker and lower brows
- Wider and shorter noses
- Broader faces (at the cheekbones)
- Bigger ears
- Higher forward growth
- More robust face
- More prominent chins (Not necessarily protruding chins. I have seen examples of this IRL)
- More masculine face in adulthood
- Higher horizontal facial symmetry
- Wider everything
------------
Body:
This is about women. I don't know if males have the same.
- Muscle efficiency.
- Higher fertility
- Higher static and explosive strength
- Thicker neck circumference
- Higher content of muscle mass, lean body mass and water (in women but probably males too).
- Higher circulating testosterone
- Higher amount of androgen receptors
____________________________________________________
I am too lazy to do behaviour. I am going to do one for testosterone too if you guys want that.
TL;DR
Face:
- Smaller and shorter + Broader forehead
- Thicker and lower brows
- Wider and shorter noses
- Broader faces (at the cheekbones)
- Bigger ears
- Higher forward growth
- More robust face
- More prominent chins (Not necessarily protruding chins. I have seen examples of this IRL)
- More masculine face in adulthood
- Higher horizontal facial symmetry
- Wider everything
Body:
- Muscle efficiency.
- Higher fertility
- Higher static and explosive strength
- Thicker neck circumference
- Higher content of muscle mass, lean body mass and water (in women but probably males too).
- Higher circulating testosterone
- Higher amount of androgen receptors
got a ratio of 0.86.@Gudru @FatJattMofo
How do you measure fwhr tbh?My ring is almost 1 cm longer
2+ fwhr
How do you measure fwhr tbh?
Define undistorted, and where can i measure mine?View attachment 169189 undistorted pics facing front
measure it in paint, divide width pixels with height pixelsDefine undistorted, and where can i measure mine?
So what would be ideal fwhr bromeasure it in paint, divide width pixels with height pixels
undistorted is a pic taken from a distance(2 meter+), distorted pics make you look narrower
no human limit. as high as possibleSo what would be ideal fwhr bro
Not true, a skull too short is bad, ideal would be around 1.9 to 2.0 i believeno human limit. as high as possible
cope. so you are saying women would be more atracted to a longer more inferior midfaced lower T and developed face?Not true, a skull too short is bad, ideal would be around 1.9 to 2.0 i believe
Of course not, thats why someting like Barret is ideal, if it's too short it will look like TitBotcope. so you are saying women would be more atracted to a longer more inferior midfaced lower T and developed face?
bullshit
fwhr is not total skull height. its midface to facial widthOf course not, thats why someting like Barret is ideal, if it's too short it will look like TitBot
Gigacope, mine is longer and i have everything asociated with high T, to the letterIt looks "wrong" if the ring finger is longer somehow. Not aesthetic
does it look wrong when you look at your dick too? would you prefer a pussy you bitch?It looks "wrong" if the ring finger is longer somehow. Not aesthetic
well most GL men have close to 2, so id say close to 2 is ideal, I got very close to 2, 2.01.no human limit. as high as possible
biaswell most GL men have close to 2, so id say close to 2 is ideal, I got very close to 2, 2.01.