I'm an Indian geomaxxing in Eastern Europe

Yeah agreed I think Romania is good . Curries can larp romani aka Roman gypsy they’re but I’ve heard that’s a failo
Yes but polish women are better looking, usually blonde blue eyed while gypsy foids are well yh closer to light skin curries than white women. Hungarian foids are whiteish though
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and curryascenderr
Yes but polish women are better looking, usually blonde blue eyed while gypsy foids are well yh closer to light skin curries than white women. Hungarian foids are whiteish though
I don’t rlly find polish or Slavic women attractive tbh I prefer the balkans
 
whats ur lookslevel and language proficiency ?
 
No. I don't plan on moving back. My plan is to marry a local woman, learn the language, and settle down here permanently.
If you do this, how will you raise your offspring? Will your raise them to appreciate Poland/Europe, and seek assimilation, or see it as a colony to extract resources from? If they get bullied, for looking different, how will you respond? Will you respond by explaining the realities of ethnocentrism, and collectivism (which all races are guilty of), or by demonizing eastern Europeans?
These are interesting questions, I don't think most people consider when moving to foreign lands and marrying a local.
 
Last edited:
If you do this, how will you raise your offspring? Will your raise them to appreciate Poland/Europe, and seek assimilation, or see it as a colony to extract resources from? If they get bullied, for looking different, how will you respond? Will you respond by explaining the realities of ethnocentrism, and collectivism (which all races are guilty of), or by demonizing eastern Europeans?
These are interesting questions, I don't think most people consider when moving to foreign lands and marrying a local.
I will just send the kids to an international expat school tbh with other expat’s kids. Sending kids to a local school is dumb, the quality of education in these countries is not at all good.

Will teach them the language of course, but like that’s probably it. I wouldn’t raise them to appreciate the country or anything like that lmao. That is a weird slave like mentality lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi, curryascenderr and Chadeep
Jfl at all the shitskins in the thread thinking they have remotely any chance :feelshaha: hope OP gets beat up by some skinhead, not like he will get any foids there thats for sure
I’m already in a relationship.

Also all the skinheads in Ukraine are off in the trenches somewhere tbh.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi
I will just send the kids to an international expat school tbh with other expat’s kids. Sending kids to a local school is dumb, the quality of education in these countries is not at all good.
That seems logical and standard.
Will teach them the language of course, but like that’s probably it. I wouldn’t raise them to appreciate the country or anything like that lmao. That is a weird slave like mentality lol.
I appreciate the honesty. As many slavic countries were victims of communism, fascism and islamic expansionism, I wonder if they will reflect your attitudes to them, towards you. As above, so below. Or whether EE will accept their demographic and cultural replacement with a silent whimper, like much of Western Europe. Humanity is at such a fascinating point in history.
 
Last edited:
That seems logical and standard.

I appreciate the honesty. As many slavic countries were victims of communism, fascism and islamic expansionism, I wonder if they will reflect your attitudes to them, towards you. As above, so below. Or whether EE will accept their demographic and cultural replacement with a silent whimper, like much of Western Europe. Humanity is at such a fascinating point in history.

It is a two way street. If the locals are not willing to accept you, it is impossible to assimilate.

You can’t just demand people assimilate while refusing to interact with them.

Trying to assimilate into a community that isn’t interested in having you is extremely stupid. You lose all the benefits of being part of your original community and gain none of the benefits of the new community.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi and curryascenderr
It is a two way street. If the locals are not willing to accept you, it is impossible to assimilate.

You can’t just demand people assimilate while refusing to interact with them.
Exactly! It's a vicious cycle, and the insipid beauty of humanity isn't it?

Neither the British, nor the Muslims assimilated when they invaded India, so why should you (India) peacefully assimilate anywhere else? India hardly assimilated into Fiji when it became 4-50% Indian in the 1980s, until there was a military coupe which caused coerced repatriation, so why should any Fijians assimilate anywhere else? The Arabs never assimilated into Southern Spain with Islam's occupation for 700+ years, so why should anyone else assimilate into Spain, and why should the Spanish peaceful assimilate anywhere else including Latin America? The Spanish didn't assimilate into native American culture so why respect contemporaneous Spanish culture nowadays? Germany colonized Africa, so why should Turks assimilate into Germany, espouses the Turk with gleeful gall and guile as he lives in Germany on unemployment benefits, and espouses fundamentalism in conflict with his drinking habits. Wait a minute. The Ottoman empire never assimilated into Eastern Europe as it invaded and occupied vast land masses from the Baltics all the way up to the border of Vienna, so why should any Eastern European assimilate into Northern Europe, as Albanians reportedly cause civic disunity in different Western European countries according to mainstream media, and why should any Afghani refugee peacefully assimilate into contemporary Turkey given the great conquests Ottoman conquests? The African Barbary pirates didn't assimilate into the British Isles, so why should England assimilate into Africa (either the north or south). The British didn't assimilate into South Africa, so why should contemporary African refugees assimilate into Western Europe?

We've reached a bit of a conundrum; a vortex of retrospectively justified malice.



Trying to assimilate into a community that isn’t interested in having you is extremely stupid. You lose all the benefits of being part of your original community and gain none of the benefits of the new community.

I'll ask a more pointed question. How actively hostile will your existence be to the natives in EE, and will you cultivate, in your microcosm, a hostile culture against natives? Would you join positions of governments or tech companies and exclusively hire from your ingroup? Will you advocate for rehabilitative justice where non natives are given more lenient sentences (based on mitigating circumstances suffered while in their homeland)? Will you argue for proportionate representation of your ingroup in Politics, Media and Tech, and in the case of eventual overrepresentation, turn a blind eye to it? Will you decry any citizen crticism as 'racist'? Would you support 'misinformation' and 'hate speech laws' to criminalize such dissent?

I suspect the grating issue for all natives internationally, is when people in positions of power criticize and/or prevent legitimate criticism of cultural and demographic replacement, and in the worst of cases, put dissenters in prison, or debank them. This is present in many EU countries. Coincidentally, this seems to be less present in non-European countries that have strong in group preference.

My questions aren't mean to be inflammatory. My point is just to argue that cultural and demographic friction is in perpetual flux (where guilt is held by most, if not all, demographics, but denied by many).

What is the solution?
Even if everyone became increasingly demographically mixed, like Africa or India, new cultural, linguistic and racial distinctions, and in turn, tensions, would arise. So there is no solution to culture or demographic friction. That is humanity.

Now my autistic rant ends.
 
Last edited:
Exactly! It's a vicious cycle, and the insipid beauty of humanity isn't it?

Neither the British, nor the Muslims assimilated when they invaded India, so why should you (India) peacefully assimilate anywhere else? India hardly assimilated into Fiji when it became 4-50% Indian in the 1980s, until there was a military coupe which caused coerced repatriation, so why should any Fijians assimilate anywhere else? The Arabs never assimilated into Southern Spain with Islam's occupation for 700+ years, so why should anyone else assimilate into Spain, and why should the Spanish peaceful assimilate anywhere else including Latin America? The Spanish didn't assimilate into native American culture so why respect contemporaneous Spanish culture nowadays? Germany colonized Africa, so why should Turks assimilate into Germany, espouses the Turk with gleeful gall and guile as he lives in Germany on unemployment benefits, and espouses fundamentalism in conflict with his drinking habits. Wait a minute. The Ottoman empire never assimilated into Eastern Europe as it invaded and occupied vast land masses from the Baltics all the way up to the border of Vienna, so why should any Eastern European assimilate into Northern Europe, as Albanians reportedly cause civic disunity in different Western European countries according to mainstream media, and why should any Afghani refugee peacefully assimilate into contemporary Turkey given the great conquests Ottoman conquests? The African Barbary pirates didn't assimilate into the British Isles, so why should England assimilate into Africa (either the north or south). The British didn't assimilate into South Africa, so why should contemporary African refugees assimilate into Western Europe?

We've reached a bit of a conundrum; a vortex of retrospectively justified malice.




I'll ask a more pointed question. How actively hostile will your existence be to the natives in EE, and will you cultivate, in your microcosm, a hostile culture against natives? Would you join positions of governments or tech companies and exclusively hire from your ingroup? Will you advocate for rehabilitative justice where non natives are given more lenient sentences (based on mitigating circumstances suffered while in their homeland)? Will you argue for proportionate representation of your ingroup in Politics, Media and Tech, and in the case of eventual overrepresentation, turn a blind eye to it? Will you decry any citizen crticism as 'racist'? Would you support 'misinformation' and 'hate speech laws' to criminalize such dissent?

I suspect the grating issue for all natives internationally, is when people in positions of power criticize and/or prevent legitimate criticism of cultural and demographic replacement, and in the worst of cases, put dissenters in prison, or debank them. This is present in many EU countries. Coincidentally, this seems to be less present in non-European countries that have strong in group preference.

My questions aren't mean to be inflammatory. My point is just to argue that cultural and demographic friction is in perpetual flux (where guilt is held by most, if not all, demographics, but denied by many).

What is the solution?
Even if everyone became increasingly demographically mixed, like Africa or India, new cultural, linguistic and racial distinctions, and in turn, tensions, would arise. So there is no solution to culture or demographic friction. That is humanity.

Now my autistic rant ends.
you are overthinking this. In places with a dominant culture like the US or the UK assimilation will naturally occur given enough time. You rarely see a drastic difference between 3rd or 4th gen groups in the US or UK.

If you’re in a country like Sweden with a tiny population it might not cause Sweden is a tiny country with 0 soft power.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi
you are overthinking this. In places with a dominant culture like the US or the UK assimilation will naturally occur given enough time. You rarely see a drastic difference between 3rd or 4th gen groups in the US or UK.

If you’re in a country like Sweden with a tiny population it might not cause Sweden is a tiny country with 0 soft power.
not really the uk is pissed at migrants and canadians and australians are pissed at indians
 
not really the uk is pissed at migrants and canadians and australians are pissed at indians
They are 1st gen migrants typically.

No one is pissed at 4th gen Indians in the US cause they are usually completely American culturally and are mixed.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi and Fusionxz
They are 1st gen migrants typically.

No one is pissed at 4th gen Indians in the US cause they are usually completely American culturally and are mixed.
what about canada/uk/pakistan/australia
 
ethnics making western wages are gods to pooropian foids. These foids would fuck an aboriginal if he had money. They are destitute, if a gypsie approached them in their local shithole european they wouldn't even bat an eye but money mogger, they will do anything for easy lifestyle.
 
what about canada/uk/pakistan/australia

The 1st and 2nd gen Indians in the UK drastically dwarf the 3rd and 4th gen populations.

America had a ton of Arabs move there 100 years ago but no one today gives a shit cause they are mixed into the population.

IMG 0834
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi
"Indian geomaxxing in Eastern Europe" like there's not millions of you gypsies here
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NORDEN SLAVORUM and Swarthy Knight
The 1st and 2nd gen Indians in the UK drastically dwarf the 3rd and 4th gen populations.

America had a ton of Arabs move there 100 years ago but no one today gives a shit cause they are mixed into the population.

View attachment 3393322
wb canada and Australia? is it just full of 1st gens
 
"Indian geomaxxing in Eastern Europe" like there's not millions of you gypsies here
gypsies aren’t Indian anymore. They’re too mixed with Europeans and middle easterners and the culture is too different.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi
wb canada and Australia? is it just full of 1st gens
There are 2nd and 3rd gen populations there but they are typically dwarfed by the 1st generation population.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi and Fusionxz
There are 2nd and 3rd gen populations there but they are typically dwarfed by the 1st generation population.
kinda over for them entirety of Canada is anti migrant
 
Mostly in Poland/Ukraine/Baltics. AMA
u already how one strike boyo ure indian, i hope ure not short balding or ugly because thats geo minimising or whatever they call it
 
gypsies aren’t Indian anymore. They’re too mixed with Europeans and middle easterners and the culture is too different.
definitely not true lol
 
kinda over for them entirety of Canada is anti migrant
Generally anti migrant backlash screws over the most assimilated population who were born there.

The whole idea that ramping up racism will get migrants to leave doesn’t exactly work. Racism is irrelevant if you aren’t integrated as you don’t experience it day to day. 1st gen immigrants are basically never integrated anywhere tbh. Like your average 1st gen polish person can’t even integrate properly let alone a 1st gen guy from Pakistan.
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi and Fusionxz
u already how one strike boyo ure indian, i hope ure not short balding or ugly because thats geo minimising or whatever they call it
I am already in a relationship.
 
geomiNNing you mean?
 
  • +1
Reactions: NORDEN SLAVORUM
Generally anti migrant backlash screws over the most assimilated population who were born there.

The whole idea that ramping up racism will get migrants to leave doesn’t exactly work. Racism is irrelevant if you aren’t integrated as you don’t experience it day to day. 1st gen immigrants are basically never integrated anywhere tbh. Like your average 1st gen polish person can’t even integrate properly let alone a 1st gen guy from Pakistan.
i guess
 
especially in EE, I literally never saw an indian with a chick here, it's either latinos or blacks sometimes, turks at best. Indians here are just to uber drive :lul:. 98% of indians get height mogged by EE women
there r latinos in poland? :lul:
 
Wow the cockroach invasion of Indians even spread to Slavic lands soon the entirety of Africa will be surrounded by Indians soon too
As I said many times.

NUKE THOSE PEOPLE NUKE NUKE NUKE NUKE
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bug
150k/year is already top 0.5% income in the netherlands, let alone eastern-europe.

USA is too rich.
Tech and medical jobs in USA pay out a lot

In my country tech jobs pay 22-80k

In USA my jobs go for 80-150k :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: MoggerGaston
I saw plenty of gypsies when I was in Hungary. Very few of them would pass as indian.
yeah cause hungarians definitely are europeans lol
 
there r latinos in poland? :lul:
Yes, it's like 0 latinos 0-18 years old. Then for university ages (20-25) There are so many italians/portuguese/spanish guys here, and women. Just cause of Erasmus
 
Yes, it's like 0 latinos 0-18 years old. Then for university ages (20-25) There are so many italians/portuguese/spanish guys here, and women. Just cause of Erasmus
Oh i thought you meant hispanics from south america :lul: latins are white tho so it makes sense why polish women date them.
 
Oh i thought you meant hispanics from south america :lul: latins are white tho so it makes sense why polish women date them.
south americans get mogged by spanish/italians here. Like if I see a guy from SA he looks this dark 70% of the time and is 5'6
1735651344453
 
  • JFL
Reactions: 666PSL
yeah cause hungarians definitely are europeans lol
Something like 20% of Hungary’s population are Gypsies. They don’t really pass as Indian. If you were to drop them in India they’d be an outlier even in the northernmost parts of the country.

1735652745795

1735652656020


1735652678853
 
  • +1
Reactions: StarvedEpi

Similar threads

Lightclein
Replies
28
Views
257
Lightclein
Lightclein
Magnus Ironblood
Replies
2
Views
75
The Grinch
T
G
Replies
62
Views
818
Zenis
Zenis
Jelte
Replies
32
Views
249
chadhamed
chadhamed

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top