I'm glad reilgion is dead the whole conception of original sin had to fucking go same with the collectivism.

[Deleted member 3045]

That void is filled with Religion


No that void is merely kept with the illusion of covering with reilgion in actuality all reilgion is a potentiality for human misery where ever you have unearned hierarchy by priest classes you have potentials for human misery it's why elites constructed gods to mold into their own image all reilgion is a potential for human misery what we need is a actualizer i call for something better it's not perfect but it ain't a illusion it cares about truth it's ontology transfers down to it's epistemology.

''Beliefs are the source of that power. You take that away the new system which you bring about will first have to slaughter a lot of Humans to establish its power.''

What so all humans naturally go for unearned hierarchies ? we naturally move towards priest classes ? that's a very big claim hierachies are natural but you don't need involuntarily hierarchies.

Religion also stands on ultimate pleasures like Nirvana, Moksha, Eternal Paradise to give motivation for cultivating spiritual desires your new system would have no motivation to provide to people.

Is reason not motivation enough is eternal sex wives not enough ? cause remeber our system would forever be innovating we would forever have these cool tech's this old topic would forever be wiped.

n addition to that religion relies on symbolics, fables, myths existence of omnipotent Being to keep checks and balances, whatever the new system is it'd be a replacement of old-school religion.


You don't need an omniponent being at the top Hinduism is more based in saying we are god and we are bramha all creation is bramha experiancing itself you don't need a top down totalitarian being rather it's bottom up.

Everything else other than last paragraph is complete uneducated garbage and I won't even bother to reply.

Hinduism has an omnipotent being it's called Ishwara or synonymous with Shiva. What you refer to as "we are god" is Advaita and it simply points to the underlying Self of a human being is same as the creator. This again introduces motivation for a yogi to meditate and remove the ego to attain moksha. This again relies on a path that is undertaken that is away from satisfying base desires and again relies on belief for the achievment of the said path. So your Hinduism doesn't contradict what I'm saying AT ALL. And yes, Ishwara is an omnipotent being considering it fucking created the universe and is perpetually keeping it in order. If you were as well read as you claim to be about Hinduism you'd know the properties of God. And Hinduism also relies on fucking karma and if you're an unfaithful whore or an evil asshole you get unfavorable reincarnations. You are totally and completely fucking clueless.

 

[reptiles]

Everything else other than last paragraph is complete uneducated garbage and I won't even bother to reply.

Hinduism has an omnipotent being it's called Ishwara or synonymous with Shiva. What you refer to as "we are god" is Advaita and it simply points to the underlying Self of a human being is same as the creator. This again introduces motivation for a yogi to meditate and remove the ego to attain moksha. This again relies on a path that is undertaken that is away from satisfying base desires and again relies on belief for the achievment of the said path. So your Hinduism doesn't contradict what I'm saying AT ALL. And yes, Ishwara is an omnipotent being considering it fucking created the universe and is perpetually keeping it in order. If you were as well read as you claim to be about Hinduism you'd know the properties of God. And Hinduism also relies on fucking karma and if you're an unfaithful whore or an evil asshole you get unfavorable reincarnations. You are totally and completely fucking clueless.

Hinduism has an omnipotent being it's called Ishwara or synonymous with Shiva. What you refer to as "we are god" is Advaita and it simply points to the underlying Self of a human being is same as the creator. This again introduces motivation for a yogi to meditate and remove the ego to attain moksha. This again relies on a path that is undertaken that is away from satisfying base desires and again relies on belief for the achievment of the said path. So your Hinduism doesn't contradict what I'm saying AT ALL.






Yes hinduism has an omnipotent being but it isn't in a totalitarian format is what i am saying and it is based on every part mattering onto the greater whole what i was calling out in this main post is calling out organized or collectivistic religions also my Hinduism is more closer to panenthiesm it varies from classical hinduism it is not about this getting rid of the ego bullshit my form encourages and wants you to increase the ego you are the most important in this view as you are a greater part of the whole you matter a hell of a lot.

'' And yes, Ishwara is an omnipotent being considering it fucking created the universe and is perpetually keeping it in order.''

But again this is in a different format yes it's omnipotent but it is not heirchal the whole point in a heirachy is the greater part is greater than all the parts within the chain while hinduism says the parts matter just as much as the whole it's not the same.

''If you were as well read as you claim to be about Hinduism you'd know the properties of God.''


The classical terms omni traits it's different here though in hinduism you have no inherent heirachy in it's first principles as even the lesser ego matters as much as the larger ego.

''And Hinduism also relies on fucking karma and if you're an unfaithful whore or an evil asshole you get unfavorable reincarnations. You are totally and completely fucking clueless.''

They are allegories can you not read between the lines ? but even if they were true i could construct a way it would be possible logically though even then it would't be the same you we would have to go into science for this 1