im prob gon get hate for this but never forget to Christmaxx guys

i’m not disagreeing with jesus’s exsitance

i’m arguing against his divinity
Eyewitness accounts testified that his tomb was empty after the third day and many people claimed to see him. Early persecution of christians for example by the roman empire often meant torture, mutilation, and then death. Jesus's apostles who we just established existed all suffered the same fate and still would not give up Christ and reject him. People when tortured and threatened will tell their captor whatever they want to hear in order to live. The apostles lived and died by their claims. (This to me is more than enough evidence for Christs historical existence and divinity)
 
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
Whatever, as long as your happy thats what matters. My faith brings me joy but if its not for you then its OK.
yes, as long as your happy aswell.

I have morals, and my basis of morals are built on the aversion of suffering,

so if something makes you not suffer its good.

morals are human concepts that we evolved to have for the safety of our species, empathy is in birds and its more evolved in mammalians, morals are our advanced ape brains step up.
 
Eyewitness accounts testified that his tomb was empty after the third day and many people claimed to see him. Early persecution of christians for example by the roman empire often meant torture, mutilation, and then death. Jesus's apostles who we just established existed all suffered the same fate and still would not give up Christ and reject him. People when tortured and threatened will tell their captor whatever they want to hear in order to live. The apostles lived and died by their claims.
most of those eyewitness accords were fabricated by the catholic church

even most theistic scholars would agree

the catholics new in order to remain in power they’d need strong evidence —hence the king james bible

any “eyewitness accord” or non physical historical record should be taken with a grain of salt
 
  • +1
Reactions: quodia
most of those eyewitness accords were fabricated by the catholic church

even most theistic scholars would agree

the catholics new in order to remain in power they’d need strong evidence —hence the king james bible

any “eyewitness accord” or non physical historical record should be taken with a grain of salt
he's gonna bring up the shroud of Turin, letters of paul, cross references or its "predictive prophecies"
 
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
he's gonna bring up the shroud of Turin, letters of paul, cross references or its "predictive prophecies"
im pretty uninformed when it comes to those, i’d apreciate of you could argue for me

thanks bhai
 
  • +1
Reactions: quodia
he's gonna bring up the shroud of Turin, letters of paul, cross references or its "predictive prophecies"
The shroud of Turin is not hard evidence and while once thought to be debunked, evidence suggests that the original analysis is incorrect yet the claims are still not substantial enough to call it evidence and I am a skeptic. I do however agree that Jesus Christ fulfilled MANY a prophecy from the old testament which was written ages before the events described in the new testament. The "proof" we have of those things happening is secular writings or pagans knowing what early christians believed in and died for. Which for at the time is pretty compelling since you have witnesses of those events, and that movement stirring up people with different beleifs who knew what they believed in. There's much more to it all but put together I think its compelling
 
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
most of those eyewitness accords were fabricated by the catholic church

even most theistic scholars would agree

the catholics new in order to remain in power they’d need strong evidence —hence the king james bible

any “eyewitness accord” or non physical historical record should be taken with a grain of salt
I dont know how true that is (not saying I doubt, just first time hearing that)

I will say catholics dont use the KJB and its very problematic

I agree eyewitness accounts are subject to skepticism but we know that there was a massive amount of people who believed in Christ (secular writings again) and from the side of the beleivers (the gospels) and all of it was happening in real time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
The shroud of Turin is not hard evidence and while once thought to be debunked, evidence suggests that the original analysis is incorrect yet the claims are still not substantial enough to call it evidence and I am a skeptic. I do however agree that Jesus Christ fulfilled MANY a prophecy from the old testament which was written ages before the events described in the new testament. The "proof" we have of those things happening is secular writings or pagans knowing what early christians believed in and died for. Which for at the time is pretty compelling since you have witnesses of those events, and that movement stirring up people with different beleifs who knew what they believed in. There's much more to it all but put together I think its compelling
nice argument

love our high iq conversation

i don’t know shit about any of that so i’ll take your word
 
Negative iq if you believe in heaven and hell

Dumber than an atheist
so if you think its dumb and that atheism is also dumb which i can agree on,what are you?
 
I dont know how true that is (not saying I doubt, just first time hearing that)

I will say catholics dont use the KJB and its very problematic

I agree eyewitness accounts are subject to skepticism but we know that there was a massive amount of people who believed in Christ (secular writings again) and from the side of the beleivers (the gospels) and all of it was happening in real time.
at the end of the day

religion relies on faith

if it’s proven it’s fact

if it’s disproven it’s false

but religion lies somewhere in the middle ground — faith drives it (for better or worse)

both sides can be seen and accepted

it’s paradoxical natures feeds it

and at the end of the day — the one true sin is certainty

isolated certainty damns us all

(this isn’t a argument — just my philosophical take on secularism)
 
The shroud of Turin is not hard evidence and while once thought to be debunked, evidence suggests that the original analysis is incorrect yet the claims are still not substantial enough to call it evidence and I am a skeptic. I do however agree that Jesus Christ fulfilled MANY a prophecy from the old testament which was written ages before the events described in the new testament. The "proof" we have of those things happening is secular writings or pagans knowing what early christians believed in and died for. Which for at the time is pretty compelling since you have witnesses of those events, and that movement stirring up people with different beleifs who knew what they believed in. There's much more to it all but put together I think its compelling
mirin iq i hope you find the Lord✝️🙏
 
nice argument

love our high iq conversation

i don’t know shit about any of that so i’ll take your word
Also; I know non theists dont like it when theists use the bible to prove the bible, but it has value because all the bible is, is a collection of all the events that happened, composed of oral storytelling and physical writing (gospels) and were written by MANY authors who came together to tell more or less the same story (the less being catered to different audiences, thus different emphasis existed). So basically the NT is a collection of everything that happened according to believers (different authors) compiled in one not so neat text. Thats many eyewitness accounts who all died for what they believed in. I'm pretty sure all the people who wrote the gospel were executed (most by crucifixion, though a few by sword or other means)
 
at the end of the day

religion relies on faith

if it’s proven it’s fact

if it’s disproven it’s false

but religion lies somewhere in the middle ground — faith drives it (for better or worse)

both sides can be seen and accepted

it’s paradoxical natures feeds it

and at the end of the day — the one true sin is certainty

isolated certainty damns us all

(this isn’t a argument — just my philosophical take on secularism)
I completely agree with you. It wouldnt be "faith" either there was or required proof. And while I argue there is proof, it still ironically takes some faith to believe in. We could be having the same argument about any historical figure existing and what they did or did not do but at the end of the day some of us do or dont accept that Jesus was the son of god or that I dont know Blackbeard the pirate existed based on evidence provided during their lifetimes. Im glad we had a respectful conversation at least. God bless.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
Also; I know non theists dont like it when theists use the bible to prove the bible, but it has value because all the bible is, is a collection of all the events that happened, composed of oral storytelling and physical writing (gospels) and were written by MANY authors who came together to tell more or less the same story (the less being catered to different audiences, thus different emphasis existed). So basically the NT is a collection of everything that happened according to believers (different authors) compiled in one not so neat text. Thats many eyewitness accounts who all died for what they believed in. I'm pretty sure all the people who wrote the gospel were executed (most by crucifixion, though a few by sword or other means)
mirin bro...
 
at the end of the day

religion relies on faith

if it’s proven it’s fact

if it’s disproven it’s false

but religion lies somewhere in the middle ground — faith drives it (for better or worse)

both sides can be seen and accepted

it’s paradoxical natures feeds it

and at the end of the day — the one true sin is certainty

isolated certainty damns us all

(this isn’t a argument — just my philosophical take on secularism)
i disagree, proof of existence and consistency within the bible makes it not all faith but also historical evidence
 
i disagree, proof of existence and consistency within the bible makes it not all faith but also historical evidence
then you delusional

the fact that atheist and other religious entities exist disproves that

if the bible is complete fact christianity wouldn’t be argued
 
then you delusional

the fact that atheist and other religious entities exist disproves that

if the bible is complete fact christianity wouldn’t be argued
what? low iq reply lol your saying there cant be the existence of lies when theres only one truth?:lul::lul:🙏
 
so if you think its dumb and that atheism is also dumb which i can agree on,what are you?
You're dumber than an atheist as I said

There is evidence in favor of reincarnation, there is no evidence of heaven or hell

Believing every word in your book and taking all of it literally is a good litmus test

It's an indicator of how dumb you are.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
what? low iq reply lol your saying there cant be the existence of lies when theres only one truth?:lul::lul:🙏
shut up nigga

when someone hits you with evidence your just like “praying for u” like don’t tell me abt bullshit responses
 
You're dumber than an atheist as I said

There is evidence in favor of reincarnation, there is no evidence of heaven or hell

Believing every word and taking all of it literally is a good litmus test

It's an indicator of how dumb you are.
proof of reincarnation?
sure buddy im the stupid one gg not a word
 
You're dumber than an atheist as I said

There is evidence in favor of reincarnation, there is no evidence of heaven or hell

Believing every word in your book and taking all of it literally is a good litmus test

It's an indicator of how dumb you are.
bait used to be believable
 
what? low iq reply lol your saying there cant be the existence of lies when theres only one truth?:lul::lul:🙏
if jesus came down from the sky — visible to all — divinity wouldn’t be argued
 
  • +1
Reactions: IHeartVanillaCoke
nvm i didnt hit reply on a message every1 ignore this
 
shut up nigga

when someone hits you with evidence your just like “praying for u” like don’t tell me abt bullshit responses
bro lies trying to contradict truth isnt evidence that being christian solely depends on faith jfl low iq member leave the org
 
proof of reincarnation?
sure buddy im the stupid one gg not a word
Plenty of historical examples of little children recalling entire past lives

Takes 1 Google search.

Youve decided you know what life after death, before doing a single google search?

So what examples of heaven and hell do you have? Go on
 
You're dumber than an atheist as I said

There is evidence in favor of reincarnation, there is no evidence of heaven or hell

Believing every word in your book and taking all of it literally is a good litmus test

It's an indicator of how dumb you are.
i mean cmon dude

proof of reincarnation?
 
Plenty of historical examples of little children recalling entire past lives

Takes 1 Google search.

Youve decided you know what life after death, before doing a single google search?

So what examples of heaven and hell do you have? Go on
holy your so retarded bro God bless
 
i mean cmon dude

proof of reincarnation?
children who describe specific facts about past lives

Any esoteric nigga worth his chops knows this shit

Even Zherka who is overtly Christian knows its the obvious truth
 
he did lmao and we killed him 2000 ywars ago you dumb buffoon
hes fucking god

he can do whatever he wants

if he truly cares he would leave evidence — but he doesn’t!???

wowwww what a great guy jesus is, damning us all to hell
 
children who describe specific facts about past lives

Any esoteric nigga worth his chops knows this shit

Even Zherka who is overtly Christian knows its the obvious truth
it’s a better theory than “muh heaven & hell”

i believe life just ends

that’s the do all be all of us
 
hes fucking god

he can do whatever he wants

if he truly cares he would leave evidence — but he doesn’t!???

wowwww what a great guy jesus is, damning us all to hell
bro he left evidence , are you genuinely retarded bro, he took the keys of hades when he died and rose again and whoever believe in him shall not perish but have eternal life, proof of your ignorance and hate is not accepting truth when its in front of you
 
it’s a better theory than “muh heaven & hell”

i believe life just ends

that’s the do all be all of us
Heaven and hell are on earth

It takes a special kind of retard to think he goes to the pearly gates and meets his mommy and daddy in heaven
 
  • +1
Reactions: SussyBakaBoi
bro he left evidence , are you genuinely retarded bro, he took the keys of hades when he died and rose again and whoever believe in him shall not perish but have eternal life, proof of your ignorance and hate is not accepting truth when its in front of you
he’s real since the bible says so

got it
 
holy your so retarded bro God bless
In the most respectful way possible turning the other cheek also means not retaliating insults (insults in general are sin).
Do I do it? Obviously sometimes. But when preaching the good news I feel like we have to put on the best effort to follow god no matter how good the ragebait is. Love thy enemy. Love GayGymMaxx.
 
Heaven and hell are on earth

It takes a special kind of retard to think he goes to the pearly gates and meets his mommy and daddy in heaven
stop the bait 🙏
 
bro he left evidence , are you genuinely retarded bro, he took the keys of hades when he died and rose again and whoever believe in him shall not perish but have eternal life, proof of your ignorance and hate is not accepting truth when its in front of you
Notice how you didn't respond to what he said and just spewed idiocy? Jesus christ indeed
 
Heaven and hell are on earth

It takes a special kind of retard to think he goes to the pearly gates and meets his mommy and daddy in heaven
i mean figuratively sure

but yeah completely agree
 
In the most respectful way possible turning the other cheek also means not retaliating insults (insults in general are sin).
Do I do it? Obviously sometimes. But when preaching the good news I feel like we have to put on the best effort to follow god no matter how good the ragebait is. Love thy enemy. Love GayGymMaxx.
bro i do love them but when you come upon ignorance such as this it makes you tweak, i understand tho mb🙏
 
In the most respectful way possible turning the other cheek also means not retaliating insults (insults in general are sin).
Do I do it? Obviously sometimes. But when preaching the good news I feel like we have to put on the best effort to follow god no matter how good the ragebait is. Love thy enemy. Love GayGymMaxx.
ik he irritates me

can’t even agnolwdge our arguments
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
bro he left evidence , are you genuinely retarded bro, he took the keys of hades when he died and rose again and whoever believe in him shall not perish but have eternal life, proof of your ignorance and hate is not accepting truth when its in front of you
"He left evidence, are you retarded?"

Proceeds to not show any evidence.
 
he’s real since the bible says so

got it
hes real because people died for him and for 2000 years all men who wrote the bible shared the same message.. you think a lie would hold up this well
 

Similar threads

I
Replies
20
Views
252
rory4579
rory4579
JamesSapphire_8PSL
Replies
18
Views
268
JamesSapphire_8PSL
JamesSapphire_8PSL

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top