reddit-tier economic understanding.
Actually, i'd say civilization tries to keep IN CHECK our natural instincts, and fails on an almost consistent basis, but not to the point of collapse.
Id argue that the only reason why reason why society exists, or existed, is to prevent the natural chaos that humans (more specifically males) would ensue if more female mates, werent available. The is the literal, base, motivation for all of this. Now civilization has become weaker due to females being able to be employed themselves and acquire their own resources. Now, average joes can no longer can leverage their resources as a way to get pussy, because their female mates are basically making the same amount they are nowadays for the same professions, which will allow them to survive off their own livelihoods and therefore, not need an average joes resources to survive. This will allow them to bang the chads that they ACTUALLY WANT TO, in their free time whenever they please.
Not a single person is reading that.
I dont expect many people here to have the reading comprehension to do it in the first place.
Why did you waste time writing it all out then?
Because i was having a debate with one of the few who did, atleast i assumed he did. Time to see now.
It’s refreshing to see a Marxist admit this. Usually western Marxists will screech about diversity and completely ignore these facts. It’s also ironic since immigration devalues the native workforces labor powers. Marx himself was opposed to Irish immigrants into Britain for this very reason.
That is a psychological and biological fact that Marx himself admitted, I dont see why a true marxist wouldnt agree with this. Immigration in capitalism happens in a forced way, the arabs and africans in the west are not there because they want, because they like the culture, but because they need to(if they want to live a decent life) since their countries are war and hunger infested shitholes. The african-americans were also brought by the whites due to slavery. Such forced, anti-natural coexistence will of course be difficult and cause trouble. Immigration is not bad per se, but it wouldnt be that common in a fair world, since humans themselves are not prone to like radically different cultures.It’s refreshing to see a Marxist admit this. Usually western Marxists will screech about diversity and completely ignore these facts. It’s also ironic since immigration devalues the native workforces labor powers. Marx himself was opposed to Irish immigrants into Britain for this very reason.
China has the least amount of immigrants per capita btw
In one metric of diversity, China comes in dead last
China is changing fast. Over the past several decades, the country has transformed economically and culturally at a pace the world has rarely seen.qz.com
It just goes to show that China has a managerial elite, rather than what the west has, which is a bourgeois liberal elite that puts capital over the homogeneity of the Nation
Listen to his rivers of blood speech
Its the same way folks be saying how could he cheat on hes poor wife, what about the children. This is all bullshit talk, people are basically smart animals. That children talk is bullshit, the person doesnt have a sexual relationship with hes children. The reason people get upset when wifes and older women get cheated on is because people understand the sexual market place is alot worse for older women, and even so older women with children.NIGGA, WE. ARE. ANIMALS.
Holy shit you think just because humans can build a few skyscrapers (extreme hyperbole, allow me this) we are no longer beholden to our biological instincts? You think now, we are "above" these instincts.
You know what, answer me this. Why are western foids some of the most prone to cheating and infidelity (compared to other races of women), if they come from such as first class, 1st world, civilized culture. Don't you people know that infidelity and cheating are mORallY reprehensible? I mean you guys are such superhumans and we are all a bunch of subhuman shitskins, surely you guys were able to grasp the concept of fidelity before any of us right?
Clearly not... hmm, i wonder why western foids are more prone to being able to act on their own instincts compared to other foids from around the world, i mean, DONT THEY KNOW THAT THEY SHOULD BE ABOVE THEIR INSTINCTS????!!!!
#1 fascist talking point
I fuckn love this post, its 100 percent legit. Women are making more, money so there is no need to beta-bux this is one major reason marriage rates are dropping fast. Women now have pensions and retirement from their city, and better jobs. If they want children they can fuck chad/tyrone and be a single mother, and raise the children, while fucking other chads and tyrones. If the women is poor in the same senario she can get on government programs, while she looks for a beta-provider to be a step-father to the children.
Another thing to add guys, think there gonna beta bux, as they get older and get a attractive women. Guess what if you don't look decent yourself, you better be a millionare. Because these women are gonna jump on the dick of either a attractive man their age or a younger man. Ive seen this with my own eyes while on campus in the bronx. Had a 34 year old latina milf who looked 25 in the face and 25 in the body, trying to fuck me. I was just in the computer lab and this women began talking to me and smilling. We exchanged numbers, she had three children, i walked her out the building. And you literally had guy literally breaking their necks and saying god-damn.
They've already won spiritually tbh
.
While they are indeed playing dumb when they say this, there is a hint of unironic truth to these words, you just have to read in between the lines to figure what they mean actually by this.
When women are referring to the men in that statement, which type of men do you think they are talking about? Do you think they are talking the top 20% of chads whom they all haremize themselves around, and are having constant mutually wanted, casual sex with? Or do you think the are referring to the bottom 80% of men, who literally don't even register on their radar as sexual beings, just because of the way they look
It's of course the chads they are referring to. This disgusting shaming tactic that might as well be practically almost inherent to female nature is called the "apex fallacy". And it's pretty much simple definition, is that any negative experience that a female may have with a chad/alpha that she was in a relationship with, she then proceeds to lambast ALL men with a wide brush stroke accusing them of doing the same, EVEN MEN WHOM SHE WOULD'VE LITERALLY NEVER EVEN GET IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH BECAUSE OF THEIR LOOKS.
.
The majroity of women will bounce up and down on chads dick, till they get older and gain 20-40 pounds, go back in the dating market and say see these men don't want marriage or commitment.While they are indeed playing dumb when they say this, there is a hint of unironic truth to these words, you just have to read in between the lines to figure what they mean actually by this.
When women are referring to the men in that statement, which type of men do you think they are talking about? Do you think they are talking the top 20% of chads whom they all haremize themselves around, and are having constant mutually wanted, casual sex with? Or do you think the are referring to the bottom 80% of men, who literally don't even register on their radar as sexual beings, just because of the way they look
It's of course the chads they are referring to. This disgusting shaming tactic that might as well be practically almost inherent to female nature is called the "apex fallacy". And it's pretty much simple definition, is that any negative experience that a female may have with a chad/alpha that she was in a relationship with, she then proceeds to lambast ALL men with a wide brush stroke accusing them of doing the same, EVEN MEN WHOM SHE WOULD'VE LITERALLY NEVER EVEN GET IN A RELATIONSHIP WITH BECAUSE OF THEIR LOOKS.
